Guilherme Homrich, Aly Ferreira Flores Filho, Paulo Roberto Eckert, David George Dorrell
{"title":"An FEM framework for modeling forces between NdFeB magnets and HTS bulks","authors":"Guilherme Homrich, Aly Ferreira Flores Filho, Paulo Roberto Eckert, David George Dorrell","doi":"10.1108/compel-10-2023-0526","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\n<p>This paper aims to introduce an alternative for modeling levitation forces between NdFeB magnets and bulks of high-temperature superconductors (HTS). The presented approach should be evaluated through two different formulations and compared with experimental results.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\n<p>The <em>T-A</em> and <em>H</em>-<em>ϕ</em> formulations are among the most efficient approaches for modeling superconducting materials. COMSOL Multiphysics was used to apply them to magnetic levitation models and predict the forces involved.The permanent magnet movement is modeled by combining moving meshes and magnetic field identity pairs in both 2D and 3D studies.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Findings</h3>\n<p>It is shown that it is possible to use the homogenization technique for the <em>T-A</em> formulation in 3D models combined with mixed formulation boundaries and moving meshes to simulate the whole device’s geometry.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Research limitations/implications</h3>\n<p>The case studies are limited to the formulations’ implementation and a brief assessment regarding degrees of freedom. The intent is to make the simulation straightforward rather than establish a benchmark.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\n<p>The <em>H-ϕ</em> formulation considers the HTS bulk domain as isotropic, whereas the <em>T-A</em> formulation homogenization approach treats it as anisotropic. The originality of the paper lies in contrasting these different modeling approaches while incorporating the external magnetic field movement by means of the Lagrangian–Eulerian method.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->","PeriodicalId":501376,"journal":{"name":"COMPEL","volume":"22 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"COMPEL","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/compel-10-2023-0526","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose
This paper aims to introduce an alternative for modeling levitation forces between NdFeB magnets and bulks of high-temperature superconductors (HTS). The presented approach should be evaluated through two different formulations and compared with experimental results.
Design/methodology/approach
The T-A and H-ϕ formulations are among the most efficient approaches for modeling superconducting materials. COMSOL Multiphysics was used to apply them to magnetic levitation models and predict the forces involved.The permanent magnet movement is modeled by combining moving meshes and magnetic field identity pairs in both 2D and 3D studies.
Findings
It is shown that it is possible to use the homogenization technique for the T-A formulation in 3D models combined with mixed formulation boundaries and moving meshes to simulate the whole device’s geometry.
Research limitations/implications
The case studies are limited to the formulations’ implementation and a brief assessment regarding degrees of freedom. The intent is to make the simulation straightforward rather than establish a benchmark.
Originality/value
The H-ϕ formulation considers the HTS bulk domain as isotropic, whereas the T-A formulation homogenization approach treats it as anisotropic. The originality of the paper lies in contrasting these different modeling approaches while incorporating the external magnetic field movement by means of the Lagrangian–Eulerian method.