Medication “underuse” headache

IF 5 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Cephalalgia Pub Date : 2024-04-13 DOI:10.1177/03331024241245658
Wanakorn Rattanawong, Alan Rapoport, Anan Srikiatkhachorn
{"title":"Medication “underuse” headache","authors":"Wanakorn Rattanawong, Alan Rapoport, Anan Srikiatkhachorn","doi":"10.1177/03331024241245658","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BackgroundMany risk factors have been associated with migraine progression, including insufficient and ineffective utilization of migraine medications; however, they have been inadequately explored. This has resulted in suboptimal usage of medications without effective altering of prescribing recommendations for patients, posing a risk for migraine chronification.MethodsOur aim is to conduct a comprehensive review of the available evidence regarding the underuse of migraine medications, both acute and preventive. The term “underuse” includes, but is not limited to: ( 1 ) ineffective use of appropriate and inappropriate medication; ( 2 ) underutilization; ( 3 ) inappropriate timing of usage; and ( 4 ) patient dissatisfaction with medication.ResultsThe underuse of both acute and preventive medications has been shown to contribute to the progression of migraine. In terms of acute medication, chronification occurs as a result of insufficient drug use, including failure of the prescriber to select the appropriate type based on pain intensity and disability, patients taking medication too late (more than 60 minutes after the onset or after central sensitization has occurred as evidenced by allodynia), and discontinuation because of lack of effect or intolerable side effects. The underlying cause of inadequate effectiveness of acute medication lies in its inability to halt the propagation of peripheral activation to central sensitization in a timely manner. For oral and injectable preventive migraine medications, insufficient efficacy and intolerable side effects have led to poor adherence and discontinuation with subsequent progression of migraine. The underlying pathophysiology here is rooted in the repetitive stimulation of afferent sensory pain fibers, followed by ascending brainstem pain pathways plus dysfunction of the endogenous descending brainstem pain inhibitory pathway. Although anti-calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) medications partially address pain caused by the above factors, including decreased efficacy and tolerability from conventional therapy, some patients do not respond well to this treatment. Research suggests that initiating preventive anti-CGRP treatment at an early stage (during low frequency episodic migraine attacks) is more beneficial than commencing it during high frequency episodic attacks or when chronic migraine has begun.ConclusionsThe term “medication underuse” is underrecognized, but it holds significant importance. Optimal usage of acute care and preventive migraine medications could potentially prevent migraine chronification and improve the treatment of migraine attacks.","PeriodicalId":10075,"journal":{"name":"Cephalalgia","volume":"21 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cephalalgia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03331024241245658","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BackgroundMany risk factors have been associated with migraine progression, including insufficient and ineffective utilization of migraine medications; however, they have been inadequately explored. This has resulted in suboptimal usage of medications without effective altering of prescribing recommendations for patients, posing a risk for migraine chronification.MethodsOur aim is to conduct a comprehensive review of the available evidence regarding the underuse of migraine medications, both acute and preventive. The term “underuse” includes, but is not limited to: ( 1 ) ineffective use of appropriate and inappropriate medication; ( 2 ) underutilization; ( 3 ) inappropriate timing of usage; and ( 4 ) patient dissatisfaction with medication.ResultsThe underuse of both acute and preventive medications has been shown to contribute to the progression of migraine. In terms of acute medication, chronification occurs as a result of insufficient drug use, including failure of the prescriber to select the appropriate type based on pain intensity and disability, patients taking medication too late (more than 60 minutes after the onset or after central sensitization has occurred as evidenced by allodynia), and discontinuation because of lack of effect or intolerable side effects. The underlying cause of inadequate effectiveness of acute medication lies in its inability to halt the propagation of peripheral activation to central sensitization in a timely manner. For oral and injectable preventive migraine medications, insufficient efficacy and intolerable side effects have led to poor adherence and discontinuation with subsequent progression of migraine. The underlying pathophysiology here is rooted in the repetitive stimulation of afferent sensory pain fibers, followed by ascending brainstem pain pathways plus dysfunction of the endogenous descending brainstem pain inhibitory pathway. Although anti-calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) medications partially address pain caused by the above factors, including decreased efficacy and tolerability from conventional therapy, some patients do not respond well to this treatment. Research suggests that initiating preventive anti-CGRP treatment at an early stage (during low frequency episodic migraine attacks) is more beneficial than commencing it during high frequency episodic attacks or when chronic migraine has begun.ConclusionsThe term “medication underuse” is underrecognized, but it holds significant importance. Optimal usage of acute care and preventive migraine medications could potentially prevent migraine chronification and improve the treatment of migraine attacks.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
药物 "使用不足 "引发的头痛
背景许多风险因素都与偏头痛的进展有关,其中包括偏头痛药物使用不足和无效;然而,这些因素尚未得到充分探讨。我们的目的是对偏头痛药物(包括急性和预防性药物)使用不足的现有证据进行全面回顾。术语 "使用不足 "包括,但不限于(结果偏头痛急性期和预防期药物使用不足已被证实会导致偏头痛的恶化。在急性用药方面,慢性化的发生是由于用药不足,包括处方者未能根据疼痛强度和残疾程度选择合适的药物类型、患者用药过晚(发病超过60分钟后或中枢敏化发生后,表现为异痛症),以及由于缺乏疗效或无法忍受的副作用而停药。急性药物疗效不佳的根本原因在于无法及时阻止外周激活向中枢敏化的传播。对于口服和注射预防性偏头痛药物而言,疗效不佳和无法忍受的副作用导致患者不能很好地坚持用药和停药,进而导致偏头痛病情恶化。其潜在的病理生理学根源在于传入感觉痛觉纤维的重复刺激,然后是脑干疼痛上升通路,再加上内源性脑干疼痛下降抑制通路的功能障碍。虽然抗降钙素基因相关肽(CGRP)药物可以部分解决上述因素引起的疼痛,包括传统疗法的疗效和耐受性下降,但有些患者对这种疗法反应不佳。研究表明,在早期阶段(发作性偏头痛低频发作时)开始预防性抗CGRP治疗,比在发作性偏头痛高频发作时或慢性偏头痛开始发作时开始治疗更有益。最佳使用急性治疗和预防性偏头痛药物有可能防止偏头痛慢性化,并改善偏头痛发作的治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Cephalalgia
Cephalalgia 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
10.10
自引率
6.10%
发文量
108
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Cephalalgia contains original peer reviewed papers on all aspects of headache. The journal provides an international forum for original research papers, review articles and short communications. Published monthly on behalf of the International Headache Society, Cephalalgia''s rapid review averages 5 ½ weeks from author submission to first decision.
期刊最新文献
Building community and visibility: A year of social media growth for Cephalalgia. Defining the typical characteristics of orthostatic headache in patients with spontaneous intracranial hypotension. Exploring the association between familial hemiplegic migraine genes (CACNA1A, ATP1A2 and SCN1A) with migraine and epilepsy: A UK Biobank exome-wide association study. Sex differences in photophobic behaviors following cortical spreading depression in rats. A reply, drug-induced reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome: Lessons from the real world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1