Applicability of enzymatic and phenol–sulfuric acid methods for determination of cellulose nanofibers in ecotoxicity testing

IF 2.2 3区 农林科学 Q2 FORESTRY Journal of Wood Science Pub Date : 2024-04-11 DOI:10.1186/s10086-024-02131-7
Tomohiko Matsuzawa, Rie Tai, Hiroyuki Mano, Isamu Ogura
{"title":"Applicability of enzymatic and phenol–sulfuric acid methods for determination of cellulose nanofibers in ecotoxicity testing","authors":"Tomohiko Matsuzawa, Rie Tai, Hiroyuki Mano, Isamu Ogura","doi":"10.1186/s10086-024-02131-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In parallel with the development of novel materials, such as cellulose nanofibers (CNFs), their effects on aquatic organisms should be evaluated. In ecotoxicity testing, concentration measurements are important to obtain accurate exposure concentrations; however, few studies have measured the concentration and dispersion state of CNFs in test solutions. Therefore, we evaluated the applicability of enzymatic and phenol–sulfuric acid methods for CNF quantification in ecotoxicity testing. In the enzymatic method, CNF content was determined by quantifying the d-glucose produced from the CNFs using cellulase with a glucose assay kit. Three types of cellulases were purchased, and impurities such as d-glucose were identified and removed. The differences in CNF degradation efficiency among the cellulases were evaluated, and a cellulase suitable for CNF degradation was selected. In the phenol–sulfuric acid method, a microplate-based method was employed to handle a large number of samples. We demonstrated that both the enzymatic and phenol–sulfuric acid methods could quantify CNFs in media for ecotoxicity testing. The enzymatic method was able to measure lower CNF concentrations (~ 1 mg/L) than the phenol–sulfuric acid method (~ 10 mg/L) and had less interference with CNF quantification by algae and non-cellulosic polysaccharides.","PeriodicalId":17664,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Wood Science","volume":"78 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Wood Science","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s10086-024-02131-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FORESTRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In parallel with the development of novel materials, such as cellulose nanofibers (CNFs), their effects on aquatic organisms should be evaluated. In ecotoxicity testing, concentration measurements are important to obtain accurate exposure concentrations; however, few studies have measured the concentration and dispersion state of CNFs in test solutions. Therefore, we evaluated the applicability of enzymatic and phenol–sulfuric acid methods for CNF quantification in ecotoxicity testing. In the enzymatic method, CNF content was determined by quantifying the d-glucose produced from the CNFs using cellulase with a glucose assay kit. Three types of cellulases were purchased, and impurities such as d-glucose were identified and removed. The differences in CNF degradation efficiency among the cellulases were evaluated, and a cellulase suitable for CNF degradation was selected. In the phenol–sulfuric acid method, a microplate-based method was employed to handle a large number of samples. We demonstrated that both the enzymatic and phenol–sulfuric acid methods could quantify CNFs in media for ecotoxicity testing. The enzymatic method was able to measure lower CNF concentrations (~ 1 mg/L) than the phenol–sulfuric acid method (~ 10 mg/L) and had less interference with CNF quantification by algae and non-cellulosic polysaccharides.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
酶法和酚硫酸法在生态毒性测试中测定纤维素纳米纤维的适用性
在开发纤维素纳米纤维 (CNF) 等新型材料的同时,也应评估其对水生生物的影响。在生态毒性测试中,浓度测量对于获得准确的暴露浓度非常重要;然而,很少有研究测量过 CNFs 在测试溶液中的浓度和分散状态。因此,我们评估了酶法和苯酚-硫酸法在生态毒性测试中对 CNF 定量的适用性。在酶法中,通过使用葡萄糖检测试剂盒对使用纤维素酶从 CNF 生成的 d-葡萄糖进行定量,从而确定 CNF 的含量。购买了三种纤维素酶,并对 d-葡萄糖等杂质进行了鉴定和去除。评估了不同纤维素酶降解 CNF 效率的差异,并选出了一种适合降解 CNF 的纤维素酶。在苯酚-硫酸法中,采用了基于微孔板的方法来处理大量样品。结果表明,酶法和酚硫酸法都能对生态毒性测试介质中的 CNF 进行定量。与苯酚-硫酸法(约 10 mg/L)相比,酶法能够测量较低的 CNF 浓度(约 1 mg/L),而且藻类和非纤维多糖对 CNF 定量的干扰较小。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Wood Science
Journal of Wood Science 工程技术-材料科学:纸与木材
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
10.30%
发文量
57
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Wood Science is the official journal of the Japan Wood Research Society. This journal provides an international forum for the exchange of knowledge and the discussion of current issues in wood and its utilization. The journal publishes original articles on basic and applied research dealing with the science, technology, and engineering of wood, wood components, wood and wood-based products, and wood constructions. Articles concerned with pulp and paper, fiber resources from non-woody plants, wood-inhabiting insects and fungi, wood biomass, and environmental and ecological issues in forest products are also included. In addition to original articles, the journal publishes review articles on selected topics concerning wood science and related fields. The editors welcome the submission of manuscripts from any country.
期刊最新文献
Fracture predictions in impact three-point bending test of European beech Synthesis of condensed tannin model compounds regioselectively labeled with a 13C-stable isotope Mechanical properties of branch and stem wood for two Mediterranean cultivars of olive tree Effects of moisture content on the behaviour of Scots pine heartwood and sapwood under impact Chemical changes of polysaccharides in heat-treated European beech wood
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1