At-sea application of the comet assay to a deep-sea fish

IF 2.3 3区 地球科学 Q2 OCEANOGRAPHY Deep-Sea Research Part I-Oceanographic Research Papers Pub Date : 2024-04-15 DOI:10.1016/j.dsr.2024.104298
Mark G.J. Hartl , Lukas M. Baumann , Andrew K. Sweetman
{"title":"At-sea application of the comet assay to a deep-sea fish","authors":"Mark G.J. Hartl ,&nbsp;Lukas M. Baumann ,&nbsp;Andrew K. Sweetman","doi":"10.1016/j.dsr.2024.104298","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Given the go ahead, deep-sea mining operations are likely to continue for decades on a substantial spatial scale and the resulting sediment plumes combined, are likely to extend beyond the licenced mining areas, and could lead to the chronic exposure of deep-sea organisms to a mixture of metals, even mobile species, such as fish, that could conceivably display avoidance behaviour. The metal concentrations, often substantially below lethal doses, mean that individual mortality is too blunt a measure to allow assessment of “serious harm”. Commonly used cellular biomarkers of exposure in ecotoxicology include DNA damage using the Comet assay. True deep-sea ecotoxicological studies with fish are rare and to our knowledge, there are no published data or method optimizations for deep-sea fish. <em>Coryphaenoides</em> ssp. were collected during SMARTEX expedition 1 (Feb/Mar, 2023) to the Clarion Clipperton Zone (CCZ) in the Eastern Pacific Ocean using a baited trap deployed between 4580–4,732m depth for 24–48 h. Blood and gill tissue were removed and processed for the Comet assay. In order to reduce artefactual DNA damage from cryopreservation observed previously, two sets of samples were prepared: a cryopreservative (10% DMSO) was added to one set of samples and stored at −80 °C; the second set was used to perform a Comet assay within hours of collection. A custom-built gimble table enabled horizontal electrophoresis at sea after which Comet assay slides were dried and stored at room temperature until further analysis. The Comet assay was also assessed in freshly sampled and frozen rainbow trout cells as a proxy control in order to evaluate potential artefacts from the collection and sampling procedure of the deep-sea fish. The blood samples processed at sea had a significantly reduced level of DNA damage compared to the frozen samples. There was no significant difference between the fresh deep-sea and rainbow trout samples. However, the freshly prepared gill samples in <em>Coryphaenoides</em> ssp<em>.</em> showed substantial artefacts, possibly as a consequence of barotrauma. These results represent the first effort at establishing baseline DNA damage data for deep-sea fish, an essential component in understating and quantifying the impact of deep-sea mining.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51009,"journal":{"name":"Deep-Sea Research Part I-Oceanographic Research Papers","volume":"208 ","pages":"Article 104298"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0967063724000682/pdfft?md5=93c77b61fa24a8eeeb8ac93cf315133e&pid=1-s2.0-S0967063724000682-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Deep-Sea Research Part I-Oceanographic Research Papers","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0967063724000682","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OCEANOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Given the go ahead, deep-sea mining operations are likely to continue for decades on a substantial spatial scale and the resulting sediment plumes combined, are likely to extend beyond the licenced mining areas, and could lead to the chronic exposure of deep-sea organisms to a mixture of metals, even mobile species, such as fish, that could conceivably display avoidance behaviour. The metal concentrations, often substantially below lethal doses, mean that individual mortality is too blunt a measure to allow assessment of “serious harm”. Commonly used cellular biomarkers of exposure in ecotoxicology include DNA damage using the Comet assay. True deep-sea ecotoxicological studies with fish are rare and to our knowledge, there are no published data or method optimizations for deep-sea fish. Coryphaenoides ssp. were collected during SMARTEX expedition 1 (Feb/Mar, 2023) to the Clarion Clipperton Zone (CCZ) in the Eastern Pacific Ocean using a baited trap deployed between 4580–4,732m depth for 24–48 h. Blood and gill tissue were removed and processed for the Comet assay. In order to reduce artefactual DNA damage from cryopreservation observed previously, two sets of samples were prepared: a cryopreservative (10% DMSO) was added to one set of samples and stored at −80 °C; the second set was used to perform a Comet assay within hours of collection. A custom-built gimble table enabled horizontal electrophoresis at sea after which Comet assay slides were dried and stored at room temperature until further analysis. The Comet assay was also assessed in freshly sampled and frozen rainbow trout cells as a proxy control in order to evaluate potential artefacts from the collection and sampling procedure of the deep-sea fish. The blood samples processed at sea had a significantly reduced level of DNA damage compared to the frozen samples. There was no significant difference between the fresh deep-sea and rainbow trout samples. However, the freshly prepared gill samples in Coryphaenoides ssp. showed substantial artefacts, possibly as a consequence of barotrauma. These results represent the first effort at establishing baseline DNA damage data for deep-sea fish, an essential component in understating and quantifying the impact of deep-sea mining.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对深海鱼类进行彗星测定的海上应用
如果获得批准,深海采矿作业可能会在相当大的空间范围内持续数十年,由此产生的沉积物羽流很可能会延伸到获得许可的采矿区之外,并可能导致深海生物长期暴露于金属混合物中,甚至包括鱼类等可以想象会表现出回避行为的移动物种。金属浓度往往大大低于致死剂量,这意味着个体死亡率是一个过于直观的衡量标准,无法评估 "严重危害"。生态毒理学中常用的细胞生物标志物包括使用彗星试验的 DNA 损伤。真正针对鱼类的深海生态毒理学研究很少见,据我们所知,目前还没有针对深海鱼类的公开数据或优化方法。在对东太平洋克拉里昂-克利珀顿区(CCZ)进行 SMARTEX 1 号考察(2023 年 2 月/3 月)期间,我们在 4580-4732 米深的水下使用带饵诱捕器收集了 Coryphaenoides ssp.,时间为 24-48 小时。为了减少之前观察到的低温保存对DNA造成的人为损伤,我们准备了两组样本:一组样本中加入低温保存剂(10% DMSO)并保存在-80 °C;第二组样本用于在采集后数小时内进行彗星测定。定制的万向台可在海上进行水平电泳,然后将彗星测定载玻片干燥并保存在室温下,直至进一步分析。为了评估深海鱼类采集和取样过程中可能产生的人工影响,还对新鲜取样和冷冻的虹鳟鱼细胞进行了彗星测定评估,作为替代对照。与冷冻样本相比,在海上处理的血液样本的 DNA 损伤程度明显降低。新鲜的深海鱼和虹鳟鱼样本之间没有明显差异。不过,Coryphaenoides ssp.中新鲜制备的鳃样本显示出大量的伪影,这可能是气压创伤的结果。这些结果是建立深海鱼类 DNA 损伤基线数据的首次尝试,是了解和量化深海采矿影响的重要组成部分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
4.20%
发文量
144
审稿时长
18.3 weeks
期刊介绍: Deep-Sea Research Part I: Oceanographic Research Papers is devoted to the publication of the results of original scientific research, including theoretical work of evident oceanographic applicability; and the solution of instrumental or methodological problems with evidence of successful use. The journal is distinguished by its interdisciplinary nature and its breadth, covering the geological, physical, chemical and biological aspects of the ocean and its boundaries with the sea floor and the atmosphere. In addition to regular "Research Papers" and "Instruments and Methods" papers, briefer communications may be published as "Notes". Supplemental matter, such as extensive data tables or graphs and multimedia content, may be published as electronic appendices.
期刊最新文献
Nutrient fluxes, oxygen consumption and fatty acid composition from deep-water demo- and hexactinellid sponges from New Zealand The microbiome of the main deep-water scleractinian reef-framework engineers from the Southwestern Atlantic Morphospace of lanternfish larvae and their interplay with oceanographic conditions from the southeastern Pacific Ocean Editorial Board Influence of mini warm pool extent on phytoplankton productivity and export in the Arabian sea
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1