Assessing Lower-Extremity Visuo-Motor Reaction Time in Young Male Soccer Players: Test-Retest Reliability and Minimum Detectable Change of the Brain Pro System

IF 1.8 4区 心理学 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL Perceptual and Motor Skills Pub Date : 2024-04-17 DOI:10.1177/00315125241248306
Erhan Secer, Derya Ozer Kaya
{"title":"Assessing Lower-Extremity Visuo-Motor Reaction Time in Young Male Soccer Players: Test-Retest Reliability and Minimum Detectable Change of the Brain Pro System","authors":"Erhan Secer, Derya Ozer Kaya","doi":"10.1177/00315125241248306","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A reliable, versatile means of assessing visuo-motor reaction time (V-MRT) is important to football (soccer) players for many reasons, including the fact that faster V-MRT is a critical sport skill that may even play a role in reducing common sports injuries to the lower muscle extremities that can be associated with lost time on the field. We aimed to determine the test-retest reliability and minimum detectable change (MDC) of the Brain Pro System for assessing lower-extremity V-MRT in young male football players. We had 68 participants ( M age = 16.35, SD = 1.71 years) perform two assessment sessions one-week apart. For test-retest reliability, we calculated a one-way intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) at the 95% confidence interval and provided the standard error of measurement (SEM) and minimum detectable change (MDC) (MDC = SEM × 1.96 × √2) for V-MRTs. We obtained excellent V-MRT test-retest reliability for dominant lower-extremity, non-dominant lower-extremity, and dominant and non-dominant lower-extremities (ICC<jats:sub>2,1</jats:sub> = .93, 95%CI = .89–.96; ICC<jats:sub>2,1</jats:sub> = .94, 95%CI = .91–.96; ICC<jats:sub>2,1</jats:sub> = .96, 95%CI = .94–.97; respectively). The calculated MDC for the dominant lower-extremity V-MRT, the non-dominant lower-extremity V-MRT, and dominant and non-dominant lower-extremities (random) V-MRT were 1.21 seconds, 1.13 seconds, and 1.21 seconds, respectively. Brain Pro System had excellent reliability for assessing lower-extremity V-MRT in young male football players. The MDC values at the 95% confidence level (MDC95) we obtained were reliable for assessing clinically meaningful V-MRT changes.","PeriodicalId":19869,"journal":{"name":"Perceptual and Motor Skills","volume":"49 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Perceptual and Motor Skills","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00315125241248306","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A reliable, versatile means of assessing visuo-motor reaction time (V-MRT) is important to football (soccer) players for many reasons, including the fact that faster V-MRT is a critical sport skill that may even play a role in reducing common sports injuries to the lower muscle extremities that can be associated with lost time on the field. We aimed to determine the test-retest reliability and minimum detectable change (MDC) of the Brain Pro System for assessing lower-extremity V-MRT in young male football players. We had 68 participants ( M age = 16.35, SD = 1.71 years) perform two assessment sessions one-week apart. For test-retest reliability, we calculated a one-way intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) at the 95% confidence interval and provided the standard error of measurement (SEM) and minimum detectable change (MDC) (MDC = SEM × 1.96 × √2) for V-MRTs. We obtained excellent V-MRT test-retest reliability for dominant lower-extremity, non-dominant lower-extremity, and dominant and non-dominant lower-extremities (ICC2,1 = .93, 95%CI = .89–.96; ICC2,1 = .94, 95%CI = .91–.96; ICC2,1 = .96, 95%CI = .94–.97; respectively). The calculated MDC for the dominant lower-extremity V-MRT, the non-dominant lower-extremity V-MRT, and dominant and non-dominant lower-extremities (random) V-MRT were 1.21 seconds, 1.13 seconds, and 1.21 seconds, respectively. Brain Pro System had excellent reliability for assessing lower-extremity V-MRT in young male football players. The MDC values at the 95% confidence level (MDC95) we obtained were reliable for assessing clinically meaningful V-MRT changes.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估年轻男性足球运动员的下肢视觉运动反应时间:测试-重测的可靠性和大脑专业系统的最小可检测变化
对足球运动员来说,一种可靠、通用的视觉运动反应时间(V-MRT)评估方法非常重要,原因有很多,其中包括更快的视觉运动反应时间是一项关键的运动技能,它甚至可以在减少常见的下肢肌肉运动损伤方面发挥作用,而这种损伤可能会导致在球场上失去比赛时间。我们的目的是确定 Brain Pro 系统在评估年轻男性足球运动员下肢 V-MRT 时的重复测试可靠性和最小可检测变化(MDC)。我们让 68 名参与者(中位年龄 = 16.35 岁,标准差 = 1.71 岁)进行了两次评估,每次间隔一周。对于重测可靠性,我们计算了 95% 置信区间的单向类内相关系数 (ICC),并提供了 V-MRT 的测量标准误差 (SEM) 和最小可检测变化 (MDC)(MDC = SEM × 1.96 × √2)。我们对优势下肢、非优势下肢、优势下肢和非优势下肢的 V-MRT 测试-再测可靠性都取得了极佳的结果(ICC2,1 = .93,95%CI = .89-.96;ICC2,1 = .94,95%CI = .91-.96;ICC2,1 = .96,95%CI = .94-.97;分别)。优势下肢 V-MRT、非优势下肢 V-MRT、优势和非优势下肢(随机)V-MRT 的计算 MDC 分别为 1.21 秒、1.13 秒和 1.21 秒。Brain Pro 系统在评估年轻男性足球运动员的下肢 V-MRT 方面具有极佳的可靠性。我们获得的置信度为 95% 的 MDC 值(MDC95)可用于评估具有临床意义的 V-MRT 变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Perceptual and Motor Skills
Perceptual and Motor Skills PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
6.20%
发文量
110
期刊最新文献
Relationship Between Quiet Eye and Kinematic Characteristics Based on Expertise in Badminton Backhand Serve. The Role of Formative Assessment and Corrective Feedback in Shaping Meaning of Education, Academic Hardiness, and Love of Learning Among English Foreign Language Learners. Lower Blood Lactate Concentration and More Positive Affective Valence in Response to Reduced Exertion High Intensity Training (REHIT) on the Rowing Ergometer Compared to Cycle Ergometry. Principal Technique Components for Young Swimmers Evaluation. Enhancing the Free Observation Method. The Acute Effects of Short- and Long-Duration CrossFit® Session on Tissue Damage, Autonomic Response, and Fatigue: A Crossover Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1