Dominika Bujnáková, Gerhardus M. J. Lansink, Alexei V. Abramov, Tatiana Bulyonkova, Nikolai E. Dokuchaev, Trofim Domanov, Mikhail G. Dvornikov, Alexander Graphodatsky, Ekaterina Karabanina, Sergei Kliver, Andrey N. Korolev, Vladimir V. Kozhechkin, Yuri N. Litvinov, Nikolay Mamaev, Vladimir G. Monakhov, Olga Nanova, Innokentiy Okhlopkov, Alexander P. Saveljev, Anton Schinov, Elena Shiriaeva, Mikhail Sidorov, Konstantin F. Tirronen, Evgenii S. Zakharov, Nadezhda N. Zakharova, Jouni Aspi, Laura Kvist
{"title":"Expanding from local to continental scale—A genetic assessment of the Eurasian wolverine","authors":"Dominika Bujnáková, Gerhardus M. J. Lansink, Alexei V. Abramov, Tatiana Bulyonkova, Nikolai E. Dokuchaev, Trofim Domanov, Mikhail G. Dvornikov, Alexander Graphodatsky, Ekaterina Karabanina, Sergei Kliver, Andrey N. Korolev, Vladimir V. Kozhechkin, Yuri N. Litvinov, Nikolay Mamaev, Vladimir G. Monakhov, Olga Nanova, Innokentiy Okhlopkov, Alexander P. Saveljev, Anton Schinov, Elena Shiriaeva, Mikhail Sidorov, Konstantin F. Tirronen, Evgenii S. Zakharov, Nadezhda N. Zakharova, Jouni Aspi, Laura Kvist","doi":"10.1111/ddi.13846","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aim</h3>\n \n <p>Our aim was to assess the population structure, genetic diversity and demographic history of the wolverine (<i>Gulo gulo</i>) throughout its entire Eurasian range. Additionally, we aimed to contextualize and put into perspective the state of the endangered Fennoscandian population by emphasizing its connectivity to other populations.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Location</h3>\n \n <p>The main study area covered most of the Eurasian wolverine range, with samples from Finland, Russia, Kazakhstan and Mongolia.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Using a 495 bp fragment of the mitochondrial DNA control region and a frequently used set of 14 microsatellite markers on an extensive dataset of samples, we assessed the population structure, genetic diversity, and demographic history of wolverines with a variety of population genetic analyses.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>According to both nuclear and mitochondrial genetic markers, Eurasian wolverines exhibit substructure, with the most distinct population located in Fennoscandia. The Fennoscandian population has undergone a genetic bottleneck, likely influencing its genetic diversity, which is notably the lowest in Eurasia. Genetic diversity in the rest of Eurasia gradually rises towards the central part of the range and decreases again in the east, although not as significantly as in the west.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Main Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>This study reveals the population structure of wolverines across Eurasia and provides direction for allocating conservation efforts to sustain a diverse and connected wolverine population. While most of the Eurasian populations seem to be well-connected and genetically diverse, the Fennoscandian wolverines may need better connectivity to the other Eurasian populations to ensure gene flow and long-term persistence. Our study further highlights the importance of considering the population genetic structure and diversity of the entire species range when planning management strategies.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":51018,"journal":{"name":"Diversity and Distributions","volume":"30 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ddi.13846","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diversity and Distributions","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ddi.13846","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Aim
Our aim was to assess the population structure, genetic diversity and demographic history of the wolverine (Gulo gulo) throughout its entire Eurasian range. Additionally, we aimed to contextualize and put into perspective the state of the endangered Fennoscandian population by emphasizing its connectivity to other populations.
Location
The main study area covered most of the Eurasian wolverine range, with samples from Finland, Russia, Kazakhstan and Mongolia.
Methods
Using a 495 bp fragment of the mitochondrial DNA control region and a frequently used set of 14 microsatellite markers on an extensive dataset of samples, we assessed the population structure, genetic diversity, and demographic history of wolverines with a variety of population genetic analyses.
Results
According to both nuclear and mitochondrial genetic markers, Eurasian wolverines exhibit substructure, with the most distinct population located in Fennoscandia. The Fennoscandian population has undergone a genetic bottleneck, likely influencing its genetic diversity, which is notably the lowest in Eurasia. Genetic diversity in the rest of Eurasia gradually rises towards the central part of the range and decreases again in the east, although not as significantly as in the west.
Main Conclusions
This study reveals the population structure of wolverines across Eurasia and provides direction for allocating conservation efforts to sustain a diverse and connected wolverine population. While most of the Eurasian populations seem to be well-connected and genetically diverse, the Fennoscandian wolverines may need better connectivity to the other Eurasian populations to ensure gene flow and long-term persistence. Our study further highlights the importance of considering the population genetic structure and diversity of the entire species range when planning management strategies.
期刊介绍:
Diversity and Distributions is a journal of conservation biogeography. We publish papers that deal with the application of biogeographical principles, theories, and analyses (being those concerned with the distributional dynamics of taxa and assemblages) to problems concerning the conservation of biodiversity. We no longer consider papers the sole aim of which is to describe or analyze patterns of biodiversity or to elucidate processes that generate biodiversity.