Classification of terrestrial impact craters based on morphometric parameters using remote sensing data: a case study of Jeokjung-Chogye impact crater, South Korea

IF 1 4区 地球科学 Q4 GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Geosciences Journal Pub Date : 2024-04-18 DOI:10.1007/s12303-024-0007-3
Habimana Emmanuel, Jaehyung Yu, Lei Wang, Sung Hi Choi, Gilljae Lee, Digne E. Rwabuhungu R
{"title":"Classification of terrestrial impact craters based on morphometric parameters using remote sensing data: a case study of Jeokjung-Chogye impact crater, South Korea","authors":"Habimana Emmanuel, Jaehyung Yu, Lei Wang, Sung Hi Choi, Gilljae Lee, Digne E. Rwabuhungu R","doi":"10.1007/s12303-024-0007-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study aims to develop an automated impact crater classification machine learning (ML) method based on the morphometric parameters extracted from SRTM DEM. The training and testing dataset comprises data from 52 confirmed, well preserved, and moderately eroded impact craters and a recently discovered impact crater in Korea, Jeokjung Chogye Basin (JCB). The morphometric parameters including rim diameter, floor diameter, and wall width of complex craters and simple craters were tested by Mann Whitney U test and One Sample Wilcoxon signed rank test. The tests showed that those parameters can statistically separate the two types of craters. The Random Forest model classified them with an accuracy of 88.6% and a Kappa coefficient of 0.67, where rim diameter, floor diameter, and wall width were identified as variables with the highest Gini indices. Complex craters are characterized by a large flat diameter and wide wall width compared to simple craters with parabolic bases. The difference is caused by the impact energy when the craters were formed. The study confirmed that using machine learning, the complex craters and simple craters can be separated by checking the SRTM elevation model with machine learning methods. The morphometric parameters of JCB impact crater indicated that the crater is highly a complex crater concluded by both statistical tests and machine learning algorithm.</p>","PeriodicalId":12659,"journal":{"name":"Geosciences Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geosciences Journal","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12303-024-0007-3","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aims to develop an automated impact crater classification machine learning (ML) method based on the morphometric parameters extracted from SRTM DEM. The training and testing dataset comprises data from 52 confirmed, well preserved, and moderately eroded impact craters and a recently discovered impact crater in Korea, Jeokjung Chogye Basin (JCB). The morphometric parameters including rim diameter, floor diameter, and wall width of complex craters and simple craters were tested by Mann Whitney U test and One Sample Wilcoxon signed rank test. The tests showed that those parameters can statistically separate the two types of craters. The Random Forest model classified them with an accuracy of 88.6% and a Kappa coefficient of 0.67, where rim diameter, floor diameter, and wall width were identified as variables with the highest Gini indices. Complex craters are characterized by a large flat diameter and wide wall width compared to simple craters with parabolic bases. The difference is caused by the impact energy when the craters were formed. The study confirmed that using machine learning, the complex craters and simple craters can be separated by checking the SRTM elevation model with machine learning methods. The morphometric parameters of JCB impact crater indicated that the crater is highly a complex crater concluded by both statistical tests and machine learning algorithm.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用遥感数据根据形态参数对陆地撞击坑进行分类:韩国 Jeokjung-Chogye 撞击坑案例研究
本研究旨在开发一种基于从 SRTM DEM 提取的形态参数的自动撞击坑分类机器学习(ML)方法。训练和测试数据集包括 52 个已确认的、保存完好的和中度侵蚀的撞击坑数据,以及韩国最近发现的一个撞击坑--Jeokjung Chogye Basin(JCB)的数据。对复杂陨石坑和简单陨石坑的边缘直径、底面直径和壁宽等形态参数进行了曼-惠特尼 U 检验和单样本 Wilcoxon 符号秩检验。检验结果表明,这些参数能在统计学上将两类陨石坑区分开来。随机森林模型对它们进行分类的准确率为 88.6%,卡帕系数为 0.67,其中边缘直径、底面直径和壁宽被认为是基尼指数最高的变量。与具有抛物线基底的简单陨石坑相比,复杂陨石坑的特点是平面直径大、壁宽。造成这种差异的原因是陨石坑形成时的撞击能量。研究证实,利用机器学习方法,通过检查 SRTM 高程模型,可以将复杂陨石坑和简单陨石坑区分开来。通过统计检验和机器学习算法,JCB 撞击坑的形态参数表明该撞击坑属于高度复杂的撞击坑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Geosciences Journal
Geosciences Journal 地学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
8.30%
发文量
33
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Geosciences Journal opens a new era for the publication of geoscientific research articles in English, covering geology, geophysics, geochemistry, paleontology, structural geology, mineralogy, petrology, stratigraphy, sedimentology, environmental geology, economic geology, petroleum geology, hydrogeology, remote sensing and planetary geology.
期刊最新文献
Study and application of wide-azimuth seismic anisotropy analysis and correction in shale reservoir in Gulong Sag, Songliao Basin, China First evidence of magmatic Ni-Cu sulfides and hydrothermal Zn mineralization in Jumun Island, central-western Korean peninsula He-Ar isotopic signatures of the Mesozoic granitoids in South Korea: implications for genesis of the granitic magma and crustal evolution in NE continental margin of the Eurasian plate Segmentation geometry of strike-slip fault systems in slow-deforming regions: a proposed method and case study of the Yangsan Fault, South Korea Age and relative uplift of marine terraces controlled by fault activities along the eastern coast of Korea
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1