Gender Gap in STEM Pathways: The Role of Gender-Segregated Schooling in Mathematics and Science Performance

IF 1 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL STUDIES Pub Date : 2024-04-18 DOI:10.1007/s40841-024-00320-y
Alice Smith, Tanya Evans
{"title":"Gender Gap in STEM Pathways: The Role of Gender-Segregated Schooling in Mathematics and Science Performance","authors":"Alice Smith, Tanya Evans","doi":"10.1007/s40841-024-00320-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>According to the World Economic Forum, the occupational gender gap with men dominating well-remunerated STEM careers is a key factor in the gender pay gap. However, the problem of underrepresentation of women in STEM fields is mitigated or reversed in some Eastern European and Islamic countries. This disparity suggests that cultural factors are at play. Gender-segregated schooling, which is commonly practiced in Islamic countries, is often seen as a contributing factor. However, the issue of gender-segregated education sparks much controversy. Critics argue evidence is lacking, and segregation may foster sexism and hinder social skills.</p><p>In New Zealand, there is a significant opportunity to conduct research on gender segregation, as approximately 14.43% of girls and 14.35% of boys attend single-gender schools for their secondary (high school) education. In contrast to the USA and Australia, where single-gender schooling is predominantly offered by private and/or Catholic schools, the majority of New Zealand gender-segregated schools are state schools.</p><p>Utilising the TIMSS 2019 dataset, our analysis revealed that girls from low socio-economic backgrounds and boys from higher socio-economic backgrounds who attend single-gender schools exhibit significantly higher mathematics and science achievement scores compared to their counterparts in co-educational settings. This success is particularly striking for girls in low socio-economic settings. Given mixed international evidence, this suggests that there must be protective factors at single-gender New Zealand schools, positively influencing these students. We examine potential factors setting apart girls-only schools to provide an explanation of our results: (1) a mitigated influence of gender socialisation practices and stereotype threat and (2) explicit messaging aimed at challenging stereotypes and empowering girls to actively engage in STEM fields.</p>","PeriodicalId":44884,"journal":{"name":"NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL STUDIES","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL STUDIES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40841-024-00320-y","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

According to the World Economic Forum, the occupational gender gap with men dominating well-remunerated STEM careers is a key factor in the gender pay gap. However, the problem of underrepresentation of women in STEM fields is mitigated or reversed in some Eastern European and Islamic countries. This disparity suggests that cultural factors are at play. Gender-segregated schooling, which is commonly practiced in Islamic countries, is often seen as a contributing factor. However, the issue of gender-segregated education sparks much controversy. Critics argue evidence is lacking, and segregation may foster sexism and hinder social skills.

In New Zealand, there is a significant opportunity to conduct research on gender segregation, as approximately 14.43% of girls and 14.35% of boys attend single-gender schools for their secondary (high school) education. In contrast to the USA and Australia, where single-gender schooling is predominantly offered by private and/or Catholic schools, the majority of New Zealand gender-segregated schools are state schools.

Utilising the TIMSS 2019 dataset, our analysis revealed that girls from low socio-economic backgrounds and boys from higher socio-economic backgrounds who attend single-gender schools exhibit significantly higher mathematics and science achievement scores compared to their counterparts in co-educational settings. This success is particularly striking for girls in low socio-economic settings. Given mixed international evidence, this suggests that there must be protective factors at single-gender New Zealand schools, positively influencing these students. We examine potential factors setting apart girls-only schools to provide an explanation of our results: (1) a mitigated influence of gender socialisation practices and stereotype threat and (2) explicit messaging aimed at challenging stereotypes and empowering girls to actively engage in STEM fields.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
STEM 途径中的性别差距:性别隔离的学校教育对数学和科学成绩的影响
据世界经济论坛称,男性在高薪的 STEM 职业中占主导地位的职业性别差距是造成男女薪酬差距的一个关键因素。然而,在一些东欧和伊斯兰国家,女性在 STEM 领域代表性不足的问题得到了缓解或扭转。这种差距表明文化因素在起作用。伊斯兰国家普遍实行的男女分校教育往往被视为一个促成因素。然而,性别隔离教育问题引发了许多争议。在新西兰,由于约有 14.43% 的女孩和 14.35% 的男孩在单一性别学校接受中学(高中)教育,因此有很大机会对性别隔离问题进行研究。在美国和澳大利亚,单一性别学校主要由私立学校和/或天主教学校提供,与此形成鲜明对比的是,新西兰大多数实行性别隔离的学校都是公立学校。利用 TIMSS 2019 数据集,我们的分析表明,与男女同校的学生相比,在单一性别学校就读的社会经济背景较低的女生和社会经济背景较高的男生的数学和科学成绩显著更高。对于社会经济背景较差的女生来说,这一成绩尤为突出。鉴于国际证据参差不齐,这表明新西兰单一性别学校一定存在保护性因素,对这些学生产生了积极影响。我们研究了使女子学校与众不同的潜在因素,为我们的结果提供了解释:(1)性别社会化实践和刻板印象威胁的影响减轻;(2)明确的信息旨在挑战刻板印象,增强女孩积极投身于 STEM 领域的能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL STUDIES
NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL STUDIES EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
11.10%
发文量
32
期刊介绍: New Zealand Journal of Education Studies (NZJES) is the journal of the New Zealand Association for Research in Education. Since 1966, NZJES has published research of relevance to both the Aotearoa New Zealand and international education communities. NZJES publishes original research and scholarly writing that is insightful and thought provoking. NZJES seeks submissions of empirical (qualitative and quantitative) and non-empirical articles, including those that are methodologically or theoretically innovative, as well as scholarly essays and book reviews. The journal is multidisciplinary and interdisciplinary in approach, and committed to the principles and practice of biculturalism. In accordance with that commitment, NZJES welcomes submissions in either Maori or English, or the inclusion of the paper abstract in both English and Maori. NZJES also welcomes international submissions that shed light on matters of interest to its readership and that include reference to Aotearoa New Zealand authors and/or contexts. The journal also welcomes proposals for Special Themed Sections, which are groups of related papers curated by guest editors.NZJES is indexed in Scopus and ERIC. All articles have undergone rigorous double blind peer review by at least two expert reviewers, who are asked to adhere to the ‘Ethical Guidelines for Peer Reviewers’ published by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
期刊最新文献
On the Democratisation and Professionalisation of Higher Education Teaching Revisiting Teacher-Family Partnerships: A Critical Policy Analysis of Pacific Education Policy 2009–2030 The Idea of a “Flawed Treaty” and its Influence on Students’ Perceptions of the New Zealand Wars Teaching the Linguistically Diverse Learner in Aotearoa New Zealand. Edited by Rosemary Erlam (2024) Perspectives of Secondary School Mathematics Teachers on the Implications of Streaming
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1