Ultrasound-based radiomics for early predicting response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with breast cancer: a systematic review with meta-analysis
Zhifan Li, Xinran Liu, Ya Gao, Xingru Lu, Junqiang Lei
{"title":"Ultrasound-based radiomics for early predicting response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with breast cancer: a systematic review with meta-analysis","authors":"Zhifan Li, Xinran Liu, Ya Gao, Xingru Lu, Junqiang Lei","doi":"10.1007/s11547-024-01783-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Objective</h3><p>This study aims to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound imaging (US)-based radiomics for the early prediction of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in breast cancer patients.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Methods</h3><p>We comprehensively searched PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, and Web of Science databases up to 1 January 2023 for eligible studies. We assessed the methodological quality of the enrolled studies with Radiomics Quality Score (RQS) and the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 tools. We performed meta-analyses to summarize the diagnostic efficacy of US-based radiomics in response to NAC in breast cancer patients.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>Eight studies proved eligible. Eligible studies exhibited an average RQS score of 12.88 (35.8% of the total score), with the RQS score ranging from 8 to 19. In the meta-analyses, the pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, and diagnostic odds ratio were 0.87 (95% CI 0.81–0.92), 0.78 (95% CI 0.72–0.83), 4.02 (95% CI 3.18–5.08), 0.16 (95% CI 0.10–0.25), and 25.17 (95% CI 15.10–41.95), respectively. Results from subgroup analyses indicated that prospective studies apparently exhibited more optimal sensitivity than retrospective studies. Sensitivity analyses exhibited similar results to the primary analyses.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusion</h3><p>US-based radiomics may be a potentially crucial adjuvant method for evaluating the response of breast cancer to NAC. Due to limited data available and low quality of eligible studies, more multicenter prospective studies with rigorous methods are required to confirm our findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":501689,"journal":{"name":"La radiologia medica","volume":"14 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"La radiologia medica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11547-024-01783-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective
This study aims to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound imaging (US)-based radiomics for the early prediction of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in breast cancer patients.
Methods
We comprehensively searched PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, and Web of Science databases up to 1 January 2023 for eligible studies. We assessed the methodological quality of the enrolled studies with Radiomics Quality Score (RQS) and the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 tools. We performed meta-analyses to summarize the diagnostic efficacy of US-based radiomics in response to NAC in breast cancer patients.
Results
Eight studies proved eligible. Eligible studies exhibited an average RQS score of 12.88 (35.8% of the total score), with the RQS score ranging from 8 to 19. In the meta-analyses, the pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, and diagnostic odds ratio were 0.87 (95% CI 0.81–0.92), 0.78 (95% CI 0.72–0.83), 4.02 (95% CI 3.18–5.08), 0.16 (95% CI 0.10–0.25), and 25.17 (95% CI 15.10–41.95), respectively. Results from subgroup analyses indicated that prospective studies apparently exhibited more optimal sensitivity than retrospective studies. Sensitivity analyses exhibited similar results to the primary analyses.
Conclusion
US-based radiomics may be a potentially crucial adjuvant method for evaluating the response of breast cancer to NAC. Due to limited data available and low quality of eligible studies, more multicenter prospective studies with rigorous methods are required to confirm our findings.
本研究旨在评估基于超声成像(US)的放射组学在早期预测乳腺癌患者对新辅助化疗(NAC)反应方面的诊断准确性。我们使用放射组学质量评分(RQS)和诊断准确性研究质量评估-2工具评估了入选研究的方法学质量。我们进行了荟萃分析,总结了基于 US 的放射组学对乳腺癌患者 NAC 的诊断效果。合格研究的平均 RQS 得分为 12.88 分(占总分的 35.8%),RQS 得分为 8 到 19 分不等。在荟萃分析中,汇总的敏感性、特异性、阳性似然比、阴性似然比和诊断几率比分别为 0.87(95% CI 0.81-0.92)、0.78(95% CI 0.72-0.83)、4.02(95% CI 3.18-5.08)、0.16(95% CI 0.10-0.25)和 25.17(95% CI 15.10-41.95)。亚组分析结果表明,前瞻性研究显然比回顾性研究具有更理想的灵敏度。结论 基于US的放射组学可能是评估乳腺癌对NAC反应的一种潜在的重要辅助方法。由于可用数据有限,且符合条件的研究质量不高,因此需要更多采用严格方法的多中心前瞻性研究来证实我们的发现。