Drug Survival of IL-17 and IL-23 Inhibitors for Psoriasis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

IF 13 1区 医学 Q1 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Drugs Pub Date : 2024-04-17 DOI:10.1007/s40265-024-02028-1
Sarah E. Thomas, Liana Barenbrug, Gerjon Hannink, Marieke M. B. Seyger, Elke M. G. J. de Jong, Juul M. P. A. van den Reek
{"title":"Drug Survival of IL-17 and IL-23 Inhibitors for Psoriasis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis","authors":"Sarah E. Thomas, Liana Barenbrug, Gerjon Hannink, Marieke M. B. Seyger, Elke M. G. J. de Jong, Juul M. P. A. van den Reek","doi":"10.1007/s40265-024-02028-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Background and Objective</h3><p>The most recently approved biologics for moderate-to-severe psoriasis are the interleukin (IL)-17 and IL-23 inhibitors. Drug survival is a frequently used outcome to assess drug performance in practice. An overview of the available drug survival studies regarding IL-17 and IL-23 inhibitors is lacking. Therefore, our objective was to assess the drug survival of IL-17 and IL-23 inhibitors for psoriasis.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Methods</h3><p>A search of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library and Web of Science was conducted (last search 27 December, 2023). Inclusion criteria were (1) cohort study; (2) patients aged ≥ 18 years with plaque psoriasis; and (3) evaluation of drug survival of at least one of the IL-17 and IL-23 inhibitors. Exclusion criteria were: primary focus on patients with psoriatic arthritis, fewer than ten study subjects and another language than English. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses reporting guideline was followed. Survival probabilities at monthly intervals were extracted from Kaplan–Meier curves using a semi-automated tool. Data were pooled using a non-parametric random-effects model to retrieve distribution-free summary survival curves. Summary drug survival curves were constructed per biologic for different discontinuation reasons: overall, ineffectiveness and adverse events, and split for the effect modifier biologic naivety. Results were analysed separately for registry/electronic health record data and for pharmacy/claims data.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>A total of 69 studies aggregating drug survival outcomes of 48,704 patients on secukinumab, ixekizumab, brodalumab, guselkumab, risankizumab, and tildrakizumab were included. Summary drug survival estimates of registry/electronic health record studies for overall, ineffectiveness and adverse event related drug survival were high (all point estimates ≥ 0.8 at year 1) for included biologics, with highest estimates for guselkumab and risankizumab. All estimates for drug survival were higher in biologic naive than in experienced patients. Estimates of pharmacy/claims databases were substantially lower than estimates from the primary analyses based on registry/electronic health record data.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusions</h3><p>This meta-analysis showed that the investigated IL-17 and IL-23 inhibitors had high drug survival rates, with highest rates for guselkumab and risankizumab drug survival. We showed that effect modifiers such as biologic naivety, and the source of data used (registry/electronic health record data vs pharmacy/claims databases) is relevant when interpreting drug survival studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":11482,"journal":{"name":"Drugs","volume":"16 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":13.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Drugs","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40265-024-02028-1","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and Objective

The most recently approved biologics for moderate-to-severe psoriasis are the interleukin (IL)-17 and IL-23 inhibitors. Drug survival is a frequently used outcome to assess drug performance in practice. An overview of the available drug survival studies regarding IL-17 and IL-23 inhibitors is lacking. Therefore, our objective was to assess the drug survival of IL-17 and IL-23 inhibitors for psoriasis.

Methods

A search of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library and Web of Science was conducted (last search 27 December, 2023). Inclusion criteria were (1) cohort study; (2) patients aged ≥ 18 years with plaque psoriasis; and (3) evaluation of drug survival of at least one of the IL-17 and IL-23 inhibitors. Exclusion criteria were: primary focus on patients with psoriatic arthritis, fewer than ten study subjects and another language than English. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses reporting guideline was followed. Survival probabilities at monthly intervals were extracted from Kaplan–Meier curves using a semi-automated tool. Data were pooled using a non-parametric random-effects model to retrieve distribution-free summary survival curves. Summary drug survival curves were constructed per biologic for different discontinuation reasons: overall, ineffectiveness and adverse events, and split for the effect modifier biologic naivety. Results were analysed separately for registry/electronic health record data and for pharmacy/claims data.

Results

A total of 69 studies aggregating drug survival outcomes of 48,704 patients on secukinumab, ixekizumab, brodalumab, guselkumab, risankizumab, and tildrakizumab were included. Summary drug survival estimates of registry/electronic health record studies for overall, ineffectiveness and adverse event related drug survival were high (all point estimates ≥ 0.8 at year 1) for included biologics, with highest estimates for guselkumab and risankizumab. All estimates for drug survival were higher in biologic naive than in experienced patients. Estimates of pharmacy/claims databases were substantially lower than estimates from the primary analyses based on registry/electronic health record data.

Conclusions

This meta-analysis showed that the investigated IL-17 and IL-23 inhibitors had high drug survival rates, with highest rates for guselkumab and risankizumab drug survival. We showed that effect modifiers such as biologic naivety, and the source of data used (registry/electronic health record data vs pharmacy/claims databases) is relevant when interpreting drug survival studies.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
IL-17和IL-23抑制剂治疗银屑病的药物生存期:系统回顾与元分析
背景和目的最近获批治疗中重度银屑病的生物制剂是白细胞介素(IL)-17 和 IL-23 抑制剂。在实践中,药物存活率是评估药物性能的常用结果。目前还缺乏关于IL-17和IL-23抑制剂药物存活率研究的综述。因此,我们的目标是评估治疗银屑病的IL-17和IL-23抑制剂的药物存活率。方法检索了PubMed、Embase、Cochrane图书馆和Web of Science(最后一次检索是2023年12月27日)。纳入标准为:(1)队列研究;(2)年龄≥ 18 岁的斑块状银屑病患者;(3)评估至少一种 IL-17 和 IL-23 抑制剂的药物存活率。排除标准为:主要关注银屑病关节炎患者、研究对象少于 10 人、使用英语以外的其他语言。研究遵循《系统综述和荟萃分析首选报告项目》报告指南。使用半自动化工具从卡普兰-梅耶曲线中提取每月间隔的生存概率。使用非参数随机效应模型对数据进行汇总,以检索无分布的生存率汇总曲线。针对不同的停药原因(总体停药、无效停药和不良事件停药),按每种生物制剂构建了药物存活率汇总曲线,并对效应修饰因子生物制剂幼稚性进行了拆分。结果 共纳入了 69 项研究,汇总了 48704 名使用 secukinumab、ixekizumab、brodalumab、guselkumab、risankizumab 和 tildrakizumab 的患者的药物生存结果。对于纳入的生物制剂,登记处/电子健康记录研究对总体、无效和不良事件相关药物存活率的汇总药物存活率估计值较高(第1年的所有点估计值均≥0.8),其中古谢库单抗和利桑珠单抗的估计值最高。生物制剂新药患者的药物存活率估计值均高于有经验的患者。结论这项荟萃分析表明,所研究的IL-17和IL-23抑制剂具有较高的药物存活率,其中古谢库单抗和利桑珠单抗的药物存活率最高。我们的研究表明,在解释药物存活率研究时,生物制剂天真性等效应调节因素和所使用的数据来源(登记处/电子健康记录数据与药房/索赔数据库)具有相关性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Drugs
Drugs 医学-毒理学
CiteScore
22.70
自引率
0.90%
发文量
134
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Drugs is a journal that aims to enhance pharmacotherapy by publishing review and original research articles on key aspects of clinical pharmacology and therapeutics. The journal includes: Leading/current opinion articles providing an overview of contentious or emerging issues. Definitive reviews of drugs and drug classes, and their place in disease management. Therapy in Practice articles including recommendations for specific clinical situations. High-quality, well designed, original clinical research. Adis Drug Evaluations reviewing the properties and place in therapy of both newer and established drugs. AdisInsight Reports summarising development at first global approval. Moreover, the journal offers additional digital features such as animated abstracts, video abstracts, instructional videos, and podcasts to increase visibility and educational value. Plain language summaries accompany articles to assist readers with some knowledge of the field in understanding important medical advances.
期刊最新文献
Drugs in Development to Manage Acute Pain. Enlonstobart: First Approval. Odronextamab: First Approval. Axatilimab: First Approval. Efficacy and Safety of Sovateltide in Patients with Acute Cerebral Ischaemic Stroke: A Randomised, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Multicentre, Phase III Clinical Trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1