Pub Date : 2024-11-19DOI: 10.1007/s40265-024-02118-0
Brian Oliver, Catherine Devitt, Grace Park, Alina Razak, Sun Mei Liu, Sergio D Bergese
Acute pain, defined as short-term pain arising from injury or other noxious stimuli, affects patient outcomes, quality of life, and healthcare costs. Safe, effective treatment of acute pain is essential in preventing increased morbidity, mortality, and the transition to chronic pain. In this review, we explore some of the latest therapeutic agents, formulations, combinations, and administration routes of drugs emerging in clinical practice in the USA for the treatment of acute pain. These agents include VX-548 (Suzetrigine), Cebranopadol, AAT-076, Combogesic intravenous (IV), sublingual ketamine, XG004 (naproxen/pregabalin conjugate), and HTX-011 (Zynrelef). We analyze the pharmacodynamics, pharmacokinetics, development status, and clinical implications of these drugs, emphasizing the importance of finding an agent that provides both a strong safety profile and effective relief from acute pain. Our findings show promise but also highlight the need for further large-scale research to allow these drugs to be utilized in a clinical context for patients experiencing acute pain.
{"title":"Drugs in Development to Manage Acute Pain.","authors":"Brian Oliver, Catherine Devitt, Grace Park, Alina Razak, Sun Mei Liu, Sergio D Bergese","doi":"10.1007/s40265-024-02118-0","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s40265-024-02118-0","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Acute pain, defined as short-term pain arising from injury or other noxious stimuli, affects patient outcomes, quality of life, and healthcare costs. Safe, effective treatment of acute pain is essential in preventing increased morbidity, mortality, and the transition to chronic pain. In this review, we explore some of the latest therapeutic agents, formulations, combinations, and administration routes of drugs emerging in clinical practice in the USA for the treatment of acute pain. These agents include VX-548 (Suzetrigine), Cebranopadol, AAT-076, Combogesic intravenous (IV), sublingual ketamine, XG004 (naproxen/pregabalin conjugate), and HTX-011 (Zynrelef). We analyze the pharmacodynamics, pharmacokinetics, development status, and clinical implications of these drugs, emphasizing the importance of finding an agent that provides both a strong safety profile and effective relief from acute pain. Our findings show promise but also highlight the need for further large-scale research to allow these drugs to be utilized in a clinical context for patients experiencing acute pain.</p>","PeriodicalId":11482,"journal":{"name":"Drugs","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":13.0,"publicationDate":"2024-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142667046","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-11-19DOI: 10.1007/s40265-024-02119-z
Matt Shirley
Enlonstobart (Enshuxing®), a recombinant, fully humanised immunoglobulin G4 monoclonal antibody targeted against programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1), is being developed by the CSPC Pharmaceutical Group for the treatment of advanced cervical cancer and other solid tumours. Enlonstobart received its first approval (a conditional marketing authorisation) in June 2024, in China, for use in patients with recurrent or metastatic programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1)-positive cervical cancer who have failed previous platinum-containing chemotherapy. Phase III clinical evaluation of enlonstobart for use as first-line treatment (in combination with chemotherapy ± bevacizumab) in patients with recurrent or metastatic PD-L1-positive cervical cancer is also underway in China. Additionally, phase II clinical development of enlonstobart (as a part of combination therapy) for use against a range of other solid tumour types is continuing. This article summarises the milestones in the development of enlonstobart leading to this first approval for recurrent or metastatic cervical cancer.
{"title":"Enlonstobart: First Approval.","authors":"Matt Shirley","doi":"10.1007/s40265-024-02119-z","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s40265-024-02119-z","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Enlonstobart (Enshuxing<sup>®</sup>), a recombinant, fully humanised immunoglobulin G4 monoclonal antibody targeted against programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1), is being developed by the CSPC Pharmaceutical Group for the treatment of advanced cervical cancer and other solid tumours. Enlonstobart received its first approval (a conditional marketing authorisation) in June 2024, in China, for use in patients with recurrent or metastatic programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1)-positive cervical cancer who have failed previous platinum-containing chemotherapy. Phase III clinical evaluation of enlonstobart for use as first-line treatment (in combination with chemotherapy ± bevacizumab) in patients with recurrent or metastatic PD-L1-positive cervical cancer is also underway in China. Additionally, phase II clinical development of enlonstobart (as a part of combination therapy) for use against a range of other solid tumour types is continuing. This article summarises the milestones in the development of enlonstobart leading to this first approval for recurrent or metastatic cervical cancer.</p>","PeriodicalId":11482,"journal":{"name":"Drugs","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":13.0,"publicationDate":"2024-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142667053","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-11-19DOI: 10.1007/s40265-024-02112-6
Hannah A Blair
Odronextamab (Ordspono™), a CD20xCD3 bispecific antibody, is being developed by Regeneron Pharmaceuticals for the treatment of B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. On 26 August 2024, odronextamab received its first approval in the EU as monotherapy for the treatment of adult patients with relapsed/refractory follicular lymphoma (FL) or relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) after ≥ 2 lines of systemic therapy. Clinical trials in various other B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, including mantle cell lymphoma, marginal zone lymphoma and chronic lymphocytic leukaemia, are underway in multiple countries. This article summarizes the milestones in the development of odronextamab leading to this first approval for the treatment of adult patients with relapsed/refractory FL or relapsed/refractory DLBCL.
Odronextamab(Ordspono™)是一种 CD20xCD3 双特异性抗体,由 Regeneron 制药公司开发,用于治疗 B 细胞非霍奇金淋巴瘤。2024 年 8 月 26 日,odronextamab 首次获得欧盟批准,作为单一疗法用于治疗复发/难治性滤泡性淋巴瘤(FL)或经≥ 2 线系统治疗后复发/难治性弥漫大 B 细胞淋巴瘤(DLBCL)成人患者。针对其他各种 B 细胞非霍奇金淋巴瘤(包括套细胞淋巴瘤、边缘区淋巴瘤和慢性淋巴细胞白血病)的临床试验正在多个国家进行。本文总结了odronextamab开发过程中的里程碑事件,这些事件促成了odronextamab首次被批准用于治疗复发/难治性FL或复发/难治性DLBCL成人患者。
{"title":"Odronextamab: First Approval.","authors":"Hannah A Blair","doi":"10.1007/s40265-024-02112-6","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s40265-024-02112-6","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Odronextamab (Ordspono<sup>™</sup>), a CD20xCD3 bispecific antibody, is being developed by Regeneron Pharmaceuticals for the treatment of B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. On 26 August 2024, odronextamab received its first approval in the EU as monotherapy for the treatment of adult patients with relapsed/refractory follicular lymphoma (FL) or relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) after ≥ 2 lines of systemic therapy. Clinical trials in various other B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, including mantle cell lymphoma, marginal zone lymphoma and chronic lymphocytic leukaemia, are underway in multiple countries. This article summarizes the milestones in the development of odronextamab leading to this first approval for the treatment of adult patients with relapsed/refractory FL or relapsed/refractory DLBCL.</p>","PeriodicalId":11482,"journal":{"name":"Drugs","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":13.0,"publicationDate":"2024-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142667054","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-11-18DOI: 10.1007/s40265-024-02109-1
Susan J Keam
Axatilimab (NIKTIMVO™; axatilimab-csfr), an anti-colony-stimulating Factor 1 Receptor (CSF-1R) humanized IgG4 (κ light chain) monoclonal antibody, is being developed by Incyte Corporation and Syndax Pharmaceuticals for the treatment of chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD) and other indications, including idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). In August 2024, axatilimab was approved in the USA for the treatment of cGVHD after failure of at least two prior lines of systemic therapy in adult and paediatric patients weighing at least 40 kg. Axatilimab was added to the NCCN guidelines for cGVHD in August 2024. This article summarizes the development milestones leading to this first approval of axatilimab for the treatment of cGVHD.
{"title":"Axatilimab: First Approval.","authors":"Susan J Keam","doi":"10.1007/s40265-024-02109-1","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40265-024-02109-1","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Axatilimab (NIKTIMVO™; axatilimab-csfr), an anti-colony-stimulating Factor 1 Receptor (CSF-1R) humanized IgG4 (κ light chain) monoclonal antibody, is being developed by Incyte Corporation and Syndax Pharmaceuticals for the treatment of chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD) and other indications, including idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). In August 2024, axatilimab was approved in the USA for the treatment of cGVHD after failure of at least two prior lines of systemic therapy in adult and paediatric patients weighing at least 40 kg. Axatilimab was added to the NCCN guidelines for cGVHD in August 2024. This article summarizes the development milestones leading to this first approval of axatilimab for the treatment of cGVHD.</p>","PeriodicalId":11482,"journal":{"name":"Drugs","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":13.0,"publicationDate":"2024-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142647673","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-11-15DOI: 10.1007/s40265-024-02121-5
Anil Gulati, Sikandar Gokuldas Adwani, Pamidimukkala Vijaya, Nilesh Radheshyam Agrawal, T C R Ramakrishnan, Hari Prakash Rai, Dinesh Jain, Nagarjunakonda Venkata Sundarachary, Jeyaraj Durai Pandian, Vijay Sardana, Mridul Sharma, Gursaran Kaur Sidhu, Sidharth Shankar Anand, Deepti Vibha, Saroja Aralikatte, Dheeraj Khurana, Deepika Joshi, Ummer Karadan, Mohd Shafat Imam Siddiqui
<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Sovateltide (Tycamzzi™), an endothelin-B (ET-B) receptor agonist, increases cerebral blood flow, has anti-apoptotic activity, and promotes neural repair following cerebral ischaemic stroke. The objectives of this study were to evaluate the efficacy and safety of sovateltide in adult participants with acute cerebral ischaemic stroke.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre, Phase III clinical trial of sovateltide in participants with cerebral ischaemic stroke receiving standard of care (SOC) in India. Patients aged 18-78 years presenting up to 24 h after the onset of symptoms with radiologic confirmation of ischaemic stroke and a National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score (NIHSS) of ≥ 6 were enrolled. Patients with recurrent stroke, receiving endovascular therapy, or with intracranial haemorrhage were excluded. The study drug (saline or sovateltide [0.3 µg/kg] was administered intravenously in three doses at 3 ± 1 h intervals on Days 1, 3, and 6, and follow-up was 90 days). The Multivariate Imputation by Chained Equations (MICE) was used to impute the missing assessments on the endpoints. An unpaired t-test, two-way analysis of variance with Tukey's multiple comparison test, and the Chi-square test were used for the statistical analysis. The objective was to determine at Day 90 (1) the number of patients with a modified Rankin Scale score (mRS) 0-2, and (2) the number of patients with an NIHSS 0-5 at 90 days.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients were randomised with 80 patients in the sovateltide and 78 in the control group. Patients received the investigational drug at about 18 h of stroke onset in both control and sovateltide groups. The median NIHSS at randomisation was 10.00 (95% CI 9.99-11.65) in the control group and 9.00 (95% CI 9.11-10.46) in the sovateltide group. Seventy patients completed the 90-day follow-up in the control group and 67 in the sovateltide group. The proportion of intention-to-treat (ITT) patients with mRS 0-2 score at Day 90 post-randomisation was 22.67% higher (odds ratio [OR] 2.75, 95% CI 1.37-5.57); similarly, the proportion of patients with NIHSS score of 0-5 at Day 90 was 17.05% more (OR 2.67, 95% CI 1.27-5.90) in the sovateltide group than in the control group. An improvement of ≥ 2 points on the mRS was observed in 51.28% and 72.50% of patients in the control and sovateltide groups, respectively (OR 2.50, 95% CI 1.29-4.81). Seven of 78 patients (8.97%) in the control group and 7 of 80 (8.75%) in the sovateltide group developed intracranial haemorrhage (ICH). The adverse events were not related to sovateltide.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The sovateltide group had a greater number of cerebral ischaemic stroke patients with lower mRS and NIHSS scores at 90 days post-treatment than the control group. This trial supported the regulatory approval of sovateltide in India, but a multinational RESP
{"title":"Efficacy and Safety of Sovateltide in Patients with Acute Cerebral Ischaemic Stroke: A Randomised, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Multicentre, Phase III Clinical Trial.","authors":"Anil Gulati, Sikandar Gokuldas Adwani, Pamidimukkala Vijaya, Nilesh Radheshyam Agrawal, T C R Ramakrishnan, Hari Prakash Rai, Dinesh Jain, Nagarjunakonda Venkata Sundarachary, Jeyaraj Durai Pandian, Vijay Sardana, Mridul Sharma, Gursaran Kaur Sidhu, Sidharth Shankar Anand, Deepti Vibha, Saroja Aralikatte, Dheeraj Khurana, Deepika Joshi, Ummer Karadan, Mohd Shafat Imam Siddiqui","doi":"10.1007/s40265-024-02121-5","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s40265-024-02121-5","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Sovateltide (Tycamzzi™), an endothelin-B (ET-B) receptor agonist, increases cerebral blood flow, has anti-apoptotic activity, and promotes neural repair following cerebral ischaemic stroke. The objectives of this study were to evaluate the efficacy and safety of sovateltide in adult participants with acute cerebral ischaemic stroke.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre, Phase III clinical trial of sovateltide in participants with cerebral ischaemic stroke receiving standard of care (SOC) in India. Patients aged 18-78 years presenting up to 24 h after the onset of symptoms with radiologic confirmation of ischaemic stroke and a National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score (NIHSS) of ≥ 6 were enrolled. Patients with recurrent stroke, receiving endovascular therapy, or with intracranial haemorrhage were excluded. The study drug (saline or sovateltide [0.3 µg/kg] was administered intravenously in three doses at 3 ± 1 h intervals on Days 1, 3, and 6, and follow-up was 90 days). The Multivariate Imputation by Chained Equations (MICE) was used to impute the missing assessments on the endpoints. An unpaired t-test, two-way analysis of variance with Tukey's multiple comparison test, and the Chi-square test were used for the statistical analysis. The objective was to determine at Day 90 (1) the number of patients with a modified Rankin Scale score (mRS) 0-2, and (2) the number of patients with an NIHSS 0-5 at 90 days.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients were randomised with 80 patients in the sovateltide and 78 in the control group. Patients received the investigational drug at about 18 h of stroke onset in both control and sovateltide groups. The median NIHSS at randomisation was 10.00 (95% CI 9.99-11.65) in the control group and 9.00 (95% CI 9.11-10.46) in the sovateltide group. Seventy patients completed the 90-day follow-up in the control group and 67 in the sovateltide group. The proportion of intention-to-treat (ITT) patients with mRS 0-2 score at Day 90 post-randomisation was 22.67% higher (odds ratio [OR] 2.75, 95% CI 1.37-5.57); similarly, the proportion of patients with NIHSS score of 0-5 at Day 90 was 17.05% more (OR 2.67, 95% CI 1.27-5.90) in the sovateltide group than in the control group. An improvement of ≥ 2 points on the mRS was observed in 51.28% and 72.50% of patients in the control and sovateltide groups, respectively (OR 2.50, 95% CI 1.29-4.81). Seven of 78 patients (8.97%) in the control group and 7 of 80 (8.75%) in the sovateltide group developed intracranial haemorrhage (ICH). The adverse events were not related to sovateltide.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The sovateltide group had a greater number of cerebral ischaemic stroke patients with lower mRS and NIHSS scores at 90 days post-treatment than the control group. This trial supported the regulatory approval of sovateltide in India, but a multinational RESP","PeriodicalId":11482,"journal":{"name":"Drugs","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":13.0,"publicationDate":"2024-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142616727","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-11-14DOI: 10.1007/s40265-024-02113-5
Sha Li, Hui-Hui Liu, Jian-Jun Li
Achievement of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) targets is crucial for the prevention of cardiovascular disease (CVD) in individuals with dyslipidaemia who are at high risk. Current guidelines recommend high-intensity statins at the highest tolerated dose as initial treatment to achieve LDL-C goals. However, the real-world situation is dismal: high-intensity statins are underused and achievement of LDL-C goals is suboptimal. Various challenges exist in the implementation of the recommended initial treatment strategy, including hesitancy to use high-intensity statins, non-adherence, and side effects, and the response to high-intensity statins varies across individuals. Emerging studies have shown another line of lipid-lowering, moderate-intensity statins in combination with ezetimibe, presenting considerable efficacy/effectiveness, along with better safety and adherence compared to statin intensification alone. Here we review the clinical evidence, treatment guidelines and challenges associated with high-intensity statins, and summarise the evidence on the combination therapy, moderate-intensity statin plus ezetimibe, which is the core strategy recommended by the 2023 Chinese Guideline for Lipid Management, as a possible primary treatment to achieve the LDL-C targets across several populations. The upfront use of a moderate-intensity statin plus ezetimibe may improve LDL-C control and lead to the prevention of CVD in real-world settings.
{"title":"Moderate-Intensity Statin Plus Ezetimibe: Time to Rethink it as an Optimal Initial Lipid-Lowering Strategy.","authors":"Sha Li, Hui-Hui Liu, Jian-Jun Li","doi":"10.1007/s40265-024-02113-5","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40265-024-02113-5","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Achievement of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) targets is crucial for the prevention of cardiovascular disease (CVD) in individuals with dyslipidaemia who are at high risk. Current guidelines recommend high-intensity statins at the highest tolerated dose as initial treatment to achieve LDL-C goals. However, the real-world situation is dismal: high-intensity statins are underused and achievement of LDL-C goals is suboptimal. Various challenges exist in the implementation of the recommended initial treatment strategy, including hesitancy to use high-intensity statins, non-adherence, and side effects, and the response to high-intensity statins varies across individuals. Emerging studies have shown another line of lipid-lowering, moderate-intensity statins in combination with ezetimibe, presenting considerable efficacy/effectiveness, along with better safety and adherence compared to statin intensification alone. Here we review the clinical evidence, treatment guidelines and challenges associated with high-intensity statins, and summarise the evidence on the combination therapy, moderate-intensity statin plus ezetimibe, which is the core strategy recommended by the 2023 Chinese Guideline for Lipid Management, as a possible primary treatment to achieve the LDL-C targets across several populations. The upfront use of a moderate-intensity statin plus ezetimibe may improve LDL-C control and lead to the prevention of CVD in real-world settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":11482,"journal":{"name":"Drugs","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":13.0,"publicationDate":"2024-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142616733","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-11-13DOI: 10.1007/s40265-024-02115-3
Ole Haagen Nielsen, Alexander Hammerhøj, Mark Andrew Ainsworth, John Gubatan, Geert D'Haens
The introduction of tumor necrosis factor inhibitors has led to a paradigm shift in the management of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). The subsequent introduction of both anti-integrins and cytokine blockers has since expanded the biologic armamentarium. However, immunogenicity, defined as the production of anti-drug antibodies (ADAs) to the prescribed biopharmaceutical, means a significant fraction of patients exposed to biologic agents will experience a secondary loss of response to one or more of the drugs. In clinical settings, immunogenicity may be caused by several factors, both patient related (e.g., underlying chronic disease, systemic immune burden, including previous biologic therapy failure, and [epi]genetic background) and treatment related (e.g., dose and administration regimens, drug physical structure, photostability, temperature, and agitation). Here, we outline these elements in detail to enhance biopharmaceutical delivery and therapy for patients with IBD. Moreover, concurrent immunomodulator medication may reduce the risks of ADA generation, especially when using the chimeric drug infliximab. Summarizing the latest developments and knowledge in the field, this review aims to provide strategies to prevent ADA production and information on managing non-responsiveness or loss of response to biologics. Better understanding of the molecular mechanisms underlying the formation of ADAs and the critical factors influencing the immunogenicity of biopharmaceuticals may lead to improved health outcomes in the IBD community that may benefit both the individual patient and society through lower healthcare expenses.
肿瘤坏死因子抑制剂的问世导致了炎症性肠病(IBD)治疗模式的转变。随后,抗整合素和细胞因子阻断剂的问世扩大了生物药物的种类。然而,免疫原性(定义为针对处方生物制药产生的抗药抗体 (ADA))意味着相当一部分接触过生物制剂的患者会对一种或多种药物继发失去反应。在临床环境中,免疫原性可能由多种因素引起,既有与患者相关的因素(如潜在的慢性疾病、全身免疫负担,包括既往的生物治疗失败以及[外]遗传背景),也有与治疗相关的因素(如剂量和给药方案、药物物理结构、光稳定性、温度和躁动)。在此,我们将详细概述这些因素,以加强 IBD 患者的生物制药给药和治疗。此外,同时服用免疫调节剂可降低产生 ADA 的风险,尤其是在使用嵌合型药物英夫利昔单抗时。本综述总结了该领域的最新进展和知识,旨在提供预防ADA产生的策略以及处理对生物制剂无应答或失去应答的信息。更好地了解 ADA 形成的分子机制以及影响生物制药免疫原性的关键因素,可能会改善 IBD 患者的健康状况,从而通过降低医疗费用使患者和社会受益。
{"title":"Immunogenicity of Therapeutic Antibodies Used for Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Treatment and Clinical Considerations.","authors":"Ole Haagen Nielsen, Alexander Hammerhøj, Mark Andrew Ainsworth, John Gubatan, Geert D'Haens","doi":"10.1007/s40265-024-02115-3","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40265-024-02115-3","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The introduction of tumor necrosis factor inhibitors has led to a paradigm shift in the management of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). The subsequent introduction of both anti-integrins and cytokine blockers has since expanded the biologic armamentarium. However, immunogenicity, defined as the production of anti-drug antibodies (ADAs) to the prescribed biopharmaceutical, means a significant fraction of patients exposed to biologic agents will experience a secondary loss of response to one or more of the drugs. In clinical settings, immunogenicity may be caused by several factors, both patient related (e.g., underlying chronic disease, systemic immune burden, including previous biologic therapy failure, and [epi]genetic background) and treatment related (e.g., dose and administration regimens, drug physical structure, photostability, temperature, and agitation). Here, we outline these elements in detail to enhance biopharmaceutical delivery and therapy for patients with IBD. Moreover, concurrent immunomodulator medication may reduce the risks of ADA generation, especially when using the chimeric drug infliximab. Summarizing the latest developments and knowledge in the field, this review aims to provide strategies to prevent ADA production and information on managing non-responsiveness or loss of response to biologics. Better understanding of the molecular mechanisms underlying the formation of ADAs and the critical factors influencing the immunogenicity of biopharmaceuticals may lead to improved health outcomes in the IBD community that may benefit both the individual patient and society through lower healthcare expenses.</p>","PeriodicalId":11482,"journal":{"name":"Drugs","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":13.0,"publicationDate":"2024-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142616729","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-11-13DOI: 10.1007/s40265-024-02111-7
Robert Kester, Sunita Zalani, Scot Ebbinghaus, Eric Rubin
The accelerated approval (AA) pathway was established by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to provide earlier access to therapies for patients with serious medical conditions and unmet medical needs. Since its inception, the AA pathway has been used for novel treatments across different therapeutic areas, but most prominently in oncology, including the immune checkpoint inhibitor class. This review article describes the history of regulatory approvals for pembrolizumab, an immunotherapy agent targeting programmed death receptor-1 (PD-1), and use of the AA pathway and the corresponding regulatory decisions made by the FDA. From its first AA in September 2014 to February 2024, pembrolizumab has used the accelerated pathway for roughly 40% of the approved indications listed in the US Prescribing Information and was the first oncology therapy to receive an AA for an alternate dosing regimen and a tissue-agnostic indication. As of February 2024, 14 of the 18 indication-specific AAs and 1 post-marketing requirement (PMR) for the alternate dosing regimen AA were converted to traditional approvals. Accelerated approvals for two indications were withdrawn, and the remaining ongoing PMRs are not due until later in 2024 or 2025. The median conversion time from AA to traditional approval was 2.6 years, which is roughly 6 months earlier than the median time reported for oncology AAs. While FDA was the first agency to establish an expedited approval pathway, regulators from other countries have established similar pathways. For pembrolizumab, approximately half of the datasets that supported US AAs also supported expedited approval, or sometimes full approval, in Canada, EU, Australia or Japan. Ultimately, the AA pathway balances the provision of earlier access to therapies with overcoming uncertainty about potential effectiveness, and therefore it is important to confirm treatment benefit and withdraw indications that do not confirm benefit in a timely manner. The regulatory strategy and use of this expedited program for pembrolizumab highlights the importance of the AA pathway in providing oncology patients with earlier access to life-saving medications.
美国食品和药物管理局(FDA)建立了加速审批(AA)途径,为病情严重和医疗需求未得到满足的患者提供更早的治疗机会。自启动以来,AA 途径已用于不同治疗领域的新型疗法,但在肿瘤学领域最为突出,其中包括免疫检查点抑制剂类药物。这篇综述文章介绍了针对程序性死亡受体-1(PD-1)的免疫疗法药物 pembrolizumab 获得监管部门批准的历史,以及 AA 途径的使用和 FDA 做出的相应监管决定。从 2014 年 9 月首次获得 AA 到 2024 年 2 月,pembrolizumab 已在美国《处方信息》中列出的约 40% 的获批适应症中使用了加速途径,并且是首个在替代给药方案和组织诊断适应症中获得 AA 的肿瘤疗法。截至 2024 年 2 月,18 个特定适应症 AA 中的 14 个和 1 个交替给药方案 AA 的上市后要求 (PMR) 已转为传统批准。两个适应症的加速批准被撤回,其余正在进行的 PMR 要到 2024 年晚些时候或 2025 年才到期。从 AA 到传统批准的中位转换时间为 2.6 年,比肿瘤学 AA 报告的中位时间大约早 6 个月。虽然 FDA 是第一个建立加速审批途径的机构,但其他国家的监管机构也建立了类似的途径。就 pembrolizumab 而言,支持美国 AA 的数据集中约有一半也支持加拿大、欧盟、澳大利亚或日本的加速审批,有时甚至是完全审批。归根结底,AA 途径在提供更早的治疗机会与克服潜在疗效的不确定性之间取得了平衡,因此必须及时确认治疗获益并撤销无法确认获益的适应症。对 pembrolizumab 的监管策略和这一加速计划的使用,凸显了 AA 途径在让肿瘤患者更早地获得救命药物方面的重要性。
{"title":"The Utilization of the Accelerated Approval Pathway in Oncology: A Case Study of Pembrolizumab.","authors":"Robert Kester, Sunita Zalani, Scot Ebbinghaus, Eric Rubin","doi":"10.1007/s40265-024-02111-7","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40265-024-02111-7","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The accelerated approval (AA) pathway was established by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to provide earlier access to therapies for patients with serious medical conditions and unmet medical needs. Since its inception, the AA pathway has been used for novel treatments across different therapeutic areas, but most prominently in oncology, including the immune checkpoint inhibitor class. This review article describes the history of regulatory approvals for pembrolizumab, an immunotherapy agent targeting programmed death receptor-1 (PD-1), and use of the AA pathway and the corresponding regulatory decisions made by the FDA. From its first AA in September 2014 to February 2024, pembrolizumab has used the accelerated pathway for roughly 40% of the approved indications listed in the US Prescribing Information and was the first oncology therapy to receive an AA for an alternate dosing regimen and a tissue-agnostic indication. As of February 2024, 14 of the 18 indication-specific AAs and 1 post-marketing requirement (PMR) for the alternate dosing regimen AA were converted to traditional approvals. Accelerated approvals for two indications were withdrawn, and the remaining ongoing PMRs are not due until later in 2024 or 2025. The median conversion time from AA to traditional approval was 2.6 years, which is roughly 6 months earlier than the median time reported for oncology AAs. While FDA was the first agency to establish an expedited approval pathway, regulators from other countries have established similar pathways. For pembrolizumab, approximately half of the datasets that supported US AAs also supported expedited approval, or sometimes full approval, in Canada, EU, Australia or Japan. Ultimately, the AA pathway balances the provision of earlier access to therapies with overcoming uncertainty about potential effectiveness, and therefore it is important to confirm treatment benefit and withdraw indications that do not confirm benefit in a timely manner. The regulatory strategy and use of this expedited program for pembrolizumab highlights the importance of the AA pathway in providing oncology patients with earlier access to life-saving medications.</p>","PeriodicalId":11482,"journal":{"name":"Drugs","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":13.0,"publicationDate":"2024-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142616734","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-11-07DOI: 10.1007/s40265-024-02101-9
Hannah A Blair
Efgartigimod (Vyvgart®; Vyvgart® Hytrulo) is a neonatal fragment crystallizable receptor (FcRn) antagonist indicated for the treatment of generalised myasthenia gravis (gMG) in adults who are acetylcholine receptor (AChR) antibody positive (Ab+). Efgartigimod is approved for both intravenous (IV) and subcutaneous (SC) use. In a pivotal phase III trial, IV efgartigimod was associated with significant and clinically meaningful improvements in myasthenia gravis symptoms and reductions in disease burden. The beneficial effects of IV efgartigimod were reproducible, durable and maintained over the long term. IV efgartigimod also improved health-related quality of life (HRQOL). In another phase III trial, SC efgartigimod PH20 was noninferior to IV efgartigimod in reducing total immunoglobulin G levels. Clinical improvement with SC efgartigimod PH20 was consistent with that of IV efgartigimod and was reproducible over the long term. Efgartigimod was generally well tolerated; the most common adverse events were headache and infections (with IV efgartigimod) and injection-site reactions (with SC efgartigimod PH20). Although further long-term data are required, IV and SC formulations of efgartigimod provide effective, generally well-tolerated and flexible treatment options for adults with AChR Ab+ gMG.
{"title":"Efgartigimod: A Review in Generalised Myasthenia Gravis.","authors":"Hannah A Blair","doi":"10.1007/s40265-024-02101-9","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40265-024-02101-9","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Efgartigimod (Vyvgart<sup>®</sup>; Vyvgart<sup>®</sup> Hytrulo) is a neonatal fragment crystallizable receptor (FcRn) antagonist indicated for the treatment of generalised myasthenia gravis (gMG) in adults who are acetylcholine receptor (AChR) antibody positive (Ab+). Efgartigimod is approved for both intravenous (IV) and subcutaneous (SC) use. In a pivotal phase III trial, IV efgartigimod was associated with significant and clinically meaningful improvements in myasthenia gravis symptoms and reductions in disease burden. The beneficial effects of IV efgartigimod were reproducible, durable and maintained over the long term. IV efgartigimod also improved health-related quality of life (HRQOL). In another phase III trial, SC efgartigimod PH20 was noninferior to IV efgartigimod in reducing total immunoglobulin G levels. Clinical improvement with SC efgartigimod PH20 was consistent with that of IV efgartigimod and was reproducible over the long term. Efgartigimod was generally well tolerated; the most common adverse events were headache and infections (with IV efgartigimod) and injection-site reactions (with SC efgartigimod PH20). Although further long-term data are required, IV and SC formulations of efgartigimod provide effective, generally well-tolerated and flexible treatment options for adults with AChR Ab+ gMG.</p>","PeriodicalId":11482,"journal":{"name":"Drugs","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":13.0,"publicationDate":"2024-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142603841","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-11-05DOI: 10.1007/s40265-024-02110-8
Susan J Keam
Vunakizumab (®) is a subcutaneous (SC) recombinant anti-interleukin (IL)-17A humanized monoclonal IgG1/κ antibody being developed by Suzhou Suncadia Biopharmaceutical Co., Ltd (a subsidiary of Jiangsu Hengrui Pharmaceuticals Co., Ltd) for the systemic treatment of autoimmune diseases related to the IL-17 pathway, including psoriasis, ankylosing spondylitis and psoriatic arthritis. In August 2024, vunakizumab was approved in China for the treatment of adult patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis who are suitable for systemic treatment or phototherapy. This article summarizes the milestones in the development of vunakizumab leading to this first approval for the systemic treatment of moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis.
{"title":"Vunakizumab: First Approval.","authors":"Susan J Keam","doi":"10.1007/s40265-024-02110-8","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40265-024-02110-8","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Vunakizumab (<sup>®</sup>) is a subcutaneous (SC) recombinant anti-interleukin (IL)-17A humanized monoclonal IgG1/κ antibody being developed by Suzhou Suncadia Biopharmaceutical Co., Ltd (a subsidiary of Jiangsu Hengrui Pharmaceuticals Co., Ltd) for the systemic treatment of autoimmune diseases related to the IL-17 pathway, including psoriasis, ankylosing spondylitis and psoriatic arthritis. In August 2024, vunakizumab was approved in China for the treatment of adult patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis who are suitable for systemic treatment or phototherapy. This article summarizes the milestones in the development of vunakizumab leading to this first approval for the systemic treatment of moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis.</p>","PeriodicalId":11482,"journal":{"name":"Drugs","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":13.0,"publicationDate":"2024-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142575627","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}