Effectiveness of behavior change and self-management theoretically-informed telehealth interventions for stroke secondary prevention: An overview of systematic reviews

IF 3.5 3区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare Pub Date : 2024-04-17 DOI:10.1177/1357633x241238779
Paula da Cruz Peniche, Christina Danielli Coelho de Morais Faria, Patricia Hall, Olive Lennon
{"title":"Effectiveness of behavior change and self-management theoretically-informed telehealth interventions for stroke secondary prevention: An overview of systematic reviews","authors":"Paula da Cruz Peniche, Christina Danielli Coelho de Morais Faria, Patricia Hall, Olive Lennon","doi":"10.1177/1357633x241238779","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"IntroductionDespite the increased use of telehealth interventions, low-level evidence supports their use for behavior change and self-management in stroke secondary prevention. Therefore, this overview of systematic reviews (SRs) critically appraises and consolidates the evidence about theoretically-informed telehealth interventions in stroke secondary prevention.MethodsTwo phases were conducted independently by two reviewers. Phase-1 included SRs contemplating randomized controlled trials (RCTs) implementing telehealth interventions with individuals post-stroke, targeting cardiovascular events, risk-reducing health behaviors or physiological risk factors. Phase-2 interrogated RCTs from these SRs that implemented theoretically-informed interventions. Best-evidence synthesis of published meta-analyses and new meta-analyses of theoretically-informed interventions were conducted. GRADE evidence was applied.ResultsIn Phase-1 (15 SRs), best-evidence synthesis identified telehealth interventions as effective in reducing recurrent angina and recurrent stroke rates (both with very low GRADE), improving medication adherence (low GRADE), physical activity participation (very low GRADE), and blood pressure targets (very low GRADE), reducing systolic blood pressure (SBP) (moderate GRADE) and low-density lipoprotein levels (very low GRADE). In Phase-2 (14 RCTs), new meta-analyses identified theoretically-informed telehealth interventions as effective in improving medication adherence (SMD: 0.38; 95%CI: 0.13–0.64; I²: 72%, low GRADE) and healthy eating (SMD: 0.38; 95%CI: 0.15–0.60; I²: 38%, low GRADE), and decreasing SBP (MD: −9.19; 95%CI: −5.49 to −12.89; I²: 0%, moderate GRADE).DiscussionTelehealth demonstrates utility in stroke secondary prevention, notably in SBP reduction. High-quality RCTs are required given the lack of current evidence supporting theoretically-informed telehealth interventions addressing primary outcomes of secondary prevention, and the low certainty evidence identified for health behavior change.","PeriodicalId":50024,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare","volume":"29 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1357633x241238779","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

IntroductionDespite the increased use of telehealth interventions, low-level evidence supports their use for behavior change and self-management in stroke secondary prevention. Therefore, this overview of systematic reviews (SRs) critically appraises and consolidates the evidence about theoretically-informed telehealth interventions in stroke secondary prevention.MethodsTwo phases were conducted independently by two reviewers. Phase-1 included SRs contemplating randomized controlled trials (RCTs) implementing telehealth interventions with individuals post-stroke, targeting cardiovascular events, risk-reducing health behaviors or physiological risk factors. Phase-2 interrogated RCTs from these SRs that implemented theoretically-informed interventions. Best-evidence synthesis of published meta-analyses and new meta-analyses of theoretically-informed interventions were conducted. GRADE evidence was applied.ResultsIn Phase-1 (15 SRs), best-evidence synthesis identified telehealth interventions as effective in reducing recurrent angina and recurrent stroke rates (both with very low GRADE), improving medication adherence (low GRADE), physical activity participation (very low GRADE), and blood pressure targets (very low GRADE), reducing systolic blood pressure (SBP) (moderate GRADE) and low-density lipoprotein levels (very low GRADE). In Phase-2 (14 RCTs), new meta-analyses identified theoretically-informed telehealth interventions as effective in improving medication adherence (SMD: 0.38; 95%CI: 0.13–0.64; I²: 72%, low GRADE) and healthy eating (SMD: 0.38; 95%CI: 0.15–0.60; I²: 38%, low GRADE), and decreasing SBP (MD: −9.19; 95%CI: −5.49 to −12.89; I²: 0%, moderate GRADE).DiscussionTelehealth demonstrates utility in stroke secondary prevention, notably in SBP reduction. High-quality RCTs are required given the lack of current evidence supporting theoretically-informed telehealth interventions addressing primary outcomes of secondary prevention, and the low certainty evidence identified for health behavior change.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
以行为改变和自我管理为理论依据的远程医疗干预对中风二级预防的有效性:系统回顾综述
引言尽管远程医疗干预的使用越来越多,但支持其用于卒中二级预防中行为改变和自我管理的证据却很少。因此,本综述对系统综述(SR)进行了批判性评估,并整合了有关卒中二级预防中基于理论的远程医疗干预的证据。第 1 阶段包括考虑对中风后患者实施远程医疗干预的随机对照试验 (RCT)、针对心血管事件、降低风险的健康行为或生理风险因素的 SR。第 2 阶段对这些 SR 中实施理论干预的 RCT 进行了调查。对已发表的荟萃分析和新的理论干预荟萃分析进行了最佳证据综合。结果在第一阶段(15 项研究)中,最佳证据综合确定远程保健干预能有效降低复发性心绞痛和复发性中风的发生率(两者的 GRADE 都很低),改善药物依从性(低 GRADE)、体育锻炼参与度(极低 GRADE)和血压目标(极低 GRADE),降低收缩压(SBP)(中等 GRADE)和低密度脂蛋白水平(极低 GRADE)。在第二阶段(14 项 RCT)中,新的荟萃分析确定了理论指导下的远程保健干预可有效改善服药依从性(SMD:0.38;95%CI:0.13-0.64;I²:72%,低 GRADE)和健康饮食(SMD:0.38; 95%CI: 0.15-0.60; I²: 38%, 低 GRADE),以及降低 SBP(MD: -9.19; 95%CI: -5.49 to -12.89; I²: 0%, 中等 GRADE)。鉴于目前缺乏证据支持以理论为依据的远程保健干预措施来解决二级预防的主要结果,且健康行为改变方面的证据确定性较低,因此需要进行高质量的 RCT 研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
14.10
自引率
10.60%
发文量
174
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare provides excellent peer reviewed coverage of developments in telemedicine and e-health and is now widely recognised as the leading journal in its field. Contributions from around the world provide a unique perspective on how different countries and health systems are using new technology in health care. Sections within the journal include technology updates, editorials, original articles, research tutorials, educational material, review articles and reports from various telemedicine organisations. A subscription to this journal will help you to stay up-to-date in this fast moving and growing area of medicine.
期刊最新文献
Satisfaction with videoconference-delivered CBT provided as part of a blended treatment approach for children and adolescents with mental disorders and their families during the COVID-19 pandemic: A follow-up survey among caregivers and therapists. Ear Portal: An urban-based ear, nose, and throat, and audiology referral telehealth portal to improve access to specialist ear health services for children. The Congenital Cardiology Cloud: Proof of feasibility of Germany's first tele-medical network for pediatric cardiology. Care trajectories for patients utilizing electronic visits for COVID-like symptoms in a large healthcare delivery system: May 2020-December 2021. Knowledge, perceptions, and readiness of telepharmacy (KPR-TP) questionnaire among pharmacists: Development and psychometric evaluation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1