Mengna Liu, Xi Chen, Haoyuan Ding, Qiaoqiao Shu, Yun Zheng, Yue Chen, Liang Cai
{"title":"Comparison of [18F]FDG and [68 Ga]pentixafor PET/CT in Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma","authors":"Mengna Liu, Xi Chen, Haoyuan Ding, Qiaoqiao Shu, Yun Zheng, Yue Chen, Liang Cai","doi":"10.1007/s11307-024-01913-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Purpose</h3><p>This study aimed to explore the feasibility of [<sup>68</sup> Ga]pentixafor positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC).</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Procedures</h3><p>This prospective study included patients with NPC who underwent [<sup>68</sup> Ga]pentixafor PET/CT and 2-[<sup>18</sup>F]fuoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose ([<sup>18</sup>F]FDG) PET/CT within one week between November 2022 and March 2023. The [<sup>68</sup> Ga]pentixafor and [<sup>18</sup>F]FDG uptakes in primary and metastatic lesions were measured and compared.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>Twenty-five participants (21 patients for initial stage and four patients for recurrence detection) were enrolled in our study. The participants underwent [<sup>18</sup>F]FDG PET/CT and [<sup>68</sup> Ga]pentixafor PET/CT. [<sup>68</sup> Ga]pentixafor PET/CT had the same detection rate as [<sup>18</sup>F]FDG for primary tumor (96% vs. 96%). The [<sup>68</sup> Ga]pentixafor maximum standard uptake value (SUV<sub>max</sub>) and target-to-background ratio (TBR) of primary tumors were lower than those of [<sup>18</sup>F]FDG (SUV<sub>max</sub>: 8.13 ± 2.78 vs. 14.25 ± 6.45; <i>P</i> < 0.01; TBR: 5.17 ± 2.14 vs. 9.81 ± 5.30, <i>P</i> < 0.01). The difference between tumor volume of [<sup>68</sup> Ga]pentixafor (TV<sub>pentixafor</sub>) and tumor volume of [<sup>18</sup>F]FDG (TV<sub>FDG</sub>) showed no significance (median: 16.01 vs. 9.56, <i>P</i> = 0.332). In the detection of suspected metastatic cervical lymph nodes (CLNs), [<sup>68</sup> Ga]pentixafor PET possessed a lower SUV<sub>max</sub> than [<sup>18</sup>F]FDG PET/CT (SUV<sub>max</sub>: 6.86 ± 2.63 vs. 10.39 ± 5.28, <i>P</i> < 0.01), but there was no significant difference in the detection rate between [<sup>68</sup> Ga]pentixafor and [<sup>18</sup>F]FDG PET/CT (96 vs. 98, <i>P</i> = 0.613).</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusions</h3><p>[<sup>68</sup> Ga]pentixafor is a promising imaging tracer for detecting primary and metastatic NPC. [<sup>68</sup> Ga]pentixafor PET/CT is comparable to [<sup>18</sup>F]FDG PET/CT in the detection rate of primary tumors and metastatic cervical lymph nodes in nasopharyngeal carcinoma, but [<sup>68</sup> Ga]pentixafor uptake was heterogeneous. [<sup>68</sup> Ga]pentixafor PET/CT may help select patients most likely to benefit from CXCR4-directed endoradiotherapy.</p><p><b>Clinical trial registration No.:</b> ChiCTR2200065902</p>","PeriodicalId":18760,"journal":{"name":"Molecular Imaging and Biology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Molecular Imaging and Biology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11307-024-01913-1","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose
This study aimed to explore the feasibility of [68 Ga]pentixafor positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC).
Procedures
This prospective study included patients with NPC who underwent [68 Ga]pentixafor PET/CT and 2-[18F]fuoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose ([18F]FDG) PET/CT within one week between November 2022 and March 2023. The [68 Ga]pentixafor and [18F]FDG uptakes in primary and metastatic lesions were measured and compared.
Results
Twenty-five participants (21 patients for initial stage and four patients for recurrence detection) were enrolled in our study. The participants underwent [18F]FDG PET/CT and [68 Ga]pentixafor PET/CT. [68 Ga]pentixafor PET/CT had the same detection rate as [18F]FDG for primary tumor (96% vs. 96%). The [68 Ga]pentixafor maximum standard uptake value (SUVmax) and target-to-background ratio (TBR) of primary tumors were lower than those of [18F]FDG (SUVmax: 8.13 ± 2.78 vs. 14.25 ± 6.45; P < 0.01; TBR: 5.17 ± 2.14 vs. 9.81 ± 5.30, P < 0.01). The difference between tumor volume of [68 Ga]pentixafor (TVpentixafor) and tumor volume of [18F]FDG (TVFDG) showed no significance (median: 16.01 vs. 9.56, P = 0.332). In the detection of suspected metastatic cervical lymph nodes (CLNs), [68 Ga]pentixafor PET possessed a lower SUVmax than [18F]FDG PET/CT (SUVmax: 6.86 ± 2.63 vs. 10.39 ± 5.28, P < 0.01), but there was no significant difference in the detection rate between [68 Ga]pentixafor and [18F]FDG PET/CT (96 vs. 98, P = 0.613).
Conclusions
[68 Ga]pentixafor is a promising imaging tracer for detecting primary and metastatic NPC. [68 Ga]pentixafor PET/CT is comparable to [18F]FDG PET/CT in the detection rate of primary tumors and metastatic cervical lymph nodes in nasopharyngeal carcinoma, but [68 Ga]pentixafor uptake was heterogeneous. [68 Ga]pentixafor PET/CT may help select patients most likely to benefit from CXCR4-directed endoradiotherapy.
期刊介绍:
Molecular Imaging and Biology (MIB) invites original contributions (research articles, review articles, commentaries, etc.) on the utilization of molecular imaging (i.e., nuclear imaging, optical imaging, autoradiography and pathology, MRI, MPI, ultrasound imaging, radiomics/genomics etc.) to investigate questions related to biology and health. The objective of MIB is to provide a forum to the discovery of molecular mechanisms of disease through the use of imaging techniques. We aim to investigate the biological nature of disease in patients and establish new molecular imaging diagnostic and therapy procedures.
Some areas that are covered are:
Preclinical and clinical imaging of macromolecular targets (e.g., genes, receptors, enzymes) involved in significant biological processes.
The design, characterization, and study of new molecular imaging probes and contrast agents for the functional interrogation of macromolecular targets.
Development and evaluation of imaging systems including instrumentation, image reconstruction algorithms, image analysis, and display.
Development of molecular assay approaches leading to quantification of the biological information obtained in molecular imaging.
Study of in vivo animal models of disease for the development of new molecular diagnostics and therapeutics.
Extension of in vitro and in vivo discoveries using disease models, into well designed clinical research investigations.
Clinical molecular imaging involving clinical investigations, clinical trials and medical management or cost-effectiveness studies.