Going forward and beyond: on the track of a practice turn in supply chain sustainability studies

IF 1.3 Q3 BUSINESS RAUSP Management Journal Pub Date : 2024-04-18 DOI:10.1108/rausp-09-2023-0181
Raphael Lissillour, Minelle E. Silva
{"title":"Going forward and beyond: on the track of a practice turn in supply chain sustainability studies","authors":"Raphael Lissillour, Minelle E. Silva","doi":"10.1108/rausp-09-2023-0181","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\n<p>Despite the growing interest in the field of supply chain sustainability (SCS), little exploration of new theories exists. Therefore, this paper aims to introduce practice theories to SCS studies through a practice turn.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\n<p>This is a conceptual paper in nature. Hence, based on theoretical arguments, the authors elaborate on how the practice turn can arise in the SCS field.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Findings</h3>\n<p>The theoretical elaboration is rooted in the understanding that sustainability is not limited to the materiality of environmental and social issues, as often observed. Instead, there is a need to include immaterial, emotional and intangible elements to better comprehend SCS practice. The authors argue that a continuum exists for a practice turn, including practice-based view, practice-based studies and critical practice theory.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Research limitations/implications</h3>\n<p>The authors provide a research agenda with a comprehensive perspective of understanding the application and implications of practice theories to SCS.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Practical implications</h3>\n<p>The practice turn in SCS studies can support managers to better understand their practices not only through recognizing explicit activities but also mainly by reflecting on hidden elements that affect their performance.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Social implications</h3>\n<p>SCS studies can better engage with grand challenges through a practice turn, which helps increase its contribution to solving social problems.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\n<p>Unlike previous literature, the paper elaborates on how practice theories are powerful in supporting both scholars and practitioners in moving away from an extremely economic focus to genuinely embrace sustainability practice. In doing so, the practice turn appears as an important phase for SCS field maturity.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->","PeriodicalId":43400,"journal":{"name":"RAUSP Management Journal","volume":"200 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"RAUSP Management Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/rausp-09-2023-0181","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

Despite the growing interest in the field of supply chain sustainability (SCS), little exploration of new theories exists. Therefore, this paper aims to introduce practice theories to SCS studies through a practice turn.

Design/methodology/approach

This is a conceptual paper in nature. Hence, based on theoretical arguments, the authors elaborate on how the practice turn can arise in the SCS field.

Findings

The theoretical elaboration is rooted in the understanding that sustainability is not limited to the materiality of environmental and social issues, as often observed. Instead, there is a need to include immaterial, emotional and intangible elements to better comprehend SCS practice. The authors argue that a continuum exists for a practice turn, including practice-based view, practice-based studies and critical practice theory.

Research limitations/implications

The authors provide a research agenda with a comprehensive perspective of understanding the application and implications of practice theories to SCS.

Practical implications

The practice turn in SCS studies can support managers to better understand their practices not only through recognizing explicit activities but also mainly by reflecting on hidden elements that affect their performance.

Social implications

SCS studies can better engage with grand challenges through a practice turn, which helps increase its contribution to solving social problems.

Originality/value

Unlike previous literature, the paper elaborates on how practice theories are powerful in supporting both scholars and practitioners in moving away from an extremely economic focus to genuinely embrace sustainability practice. In doing so, the practice turn appears as an important phase for SCS field maturity.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
前进与超越:供应链可持续性研究的实践转向
目的尽管人们对供应链可持续性(SCS)领域的兴趣与日俱增,但对新理论的探索却少之又少。因此,本文旨在通过实践转向将实践理论引入供应链可持续发展研究。因此,基于理论论据,作者阐述了实践转向如何在可持续性标准领域中产生。研究结果理论阐述植根于这样一种认识,即可持续性并不局限于环境和社会问题的物质性,正如人们经常看到的那样。相反,有必要纳入非物质、情感和无形要素,以更好地理解可持续发展战略的实践。作者认为,实践转向存在一个连续体,包括基于实践的观点、基于实践的研究和批判性实践理论。研究局限性/影响作者提供了一个研究议程,从一个全面的视角来理解实践理论对可持续消费和服务的应用和影响。实践意义可持续消费和服务研究中的实践转向可以帮助管理人员更好地理解他们的实践,不仅是通过认识明确的活动,而且主要是通过反思影响其绩效的隐藏要素。社会意义可持续发展战略研究可以通过实践转向更好地应对重大挑战,这有助于增加其对解决社会问题的贡献。原创性/价值与以往的文献不同,本文阐述了实践理论如何有力地支持学者和实践者摆脱对经济的极端关注,真正接受可持续发展实践。由此可见,实践转向是可持续发展战略领域成熟的一个重要阶段。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
5.00%
发文量
22
审稿时长
30 weeks
期刊最新文献
Exploring off-chain voting and blockchain in decentralized autonomous organizations Entrepreneurial intentions and the role of educational and social support: do the self-efficacy and the theory of planned behavior variables matter? Corporate reputation in Brazil: do board characteristics matter? Motivation for women’s football: a competing scales study Understanding the role of physical trial for good shopping decisions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1