Considerations for child protection and practice: What is child protection now?

Christine Wekerle
{"title":"Considerations for child protection and practice: What is child protection now?","authors":"Christine Wekerle","doi":"10.1016/j.chipro.2024.100025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Over the last 50 years, the global community has forged consensus on child rights and, thereby, laid the basis for defining child protection in terms of three cornerstones: (1) the protection from all forms of violence in all settings and contexts and for all children, without discrimination; (2) the provision of supports within governments, to families, and children for the promotion of child health when failures to child protection occurs; (3) and the participation of child and youth voices to value their lived experience and developmentally-based understanding of adult decisions impacting their rights. As such, child protection has historically been internationally focused, broad-based, with accountability structures within countries and internationally. When we survey some current contexts, the implementation of child rights seems to have been met with a blockage in realizing child protection, within child welfare system settings, but more graphically within conflict settings. This discussion serves as an introduction to the needed discourse on standards in responding to child rights violations, and the urgent need to formulate preventive, protective strategies to uphold the law-based consensus of global child rights and global child health goals. The United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child, and its Optional Protocols, continues to be the leading guidepost for country-level and international efforts to protect children and promote their well-being, and informs the Sustainable Development Goals integrating the protection from violence with child health, as benefiting the public health and global health targets. With seemingly shifting alliances among countries, the central focus on child rights as foundational and the driving force to child protection needs to remain as a cross-cutting, sustained commitment. Duty of care precedes the standards of care, and such standards are uppermost in need in our current socio-economic-political landscape.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100237,"journal":{"name":"Child Protection and Practice","volume":"1 ","pages":"Article 100025"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950193824000251/pdfft?md5=db86f3c1a0f237f7da890344070785ec&pid=1-s2.0-S2950193824000251-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Child Protection and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950193824000251","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Over the last 50 years, the global community has forged consensus on child rights and, thereby, laid the basis for defining child protection in terms of three cornerstones: (1) the protection from all forms of violence in all settings and contexts and for all children, without discrimination; (2) the provision of supports within governments, to families, and children for the promotion of child health when failures to child protection occurs; (3) and the participation of child and youth voices to value their lived experience and developmentally-based understanding of adult decisions impacting their rights. As such, child protection has historically been internationally focused, broad-based, with accountability structures within countries and internationally. When we survey some current contexts, the implementation of child rights seems to have been met with a blockage in realizing child protection, within child welfare system settings, but more graphically within conflict settings. This discussion serves as an introduction to the needed discourse on standards in responding to child rights violations, and the urgent need to formulate preventive, protective strategies to uphold the law-based consensus of global child rights and global child health goals. The United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child, and its Optional Protocols, continues to be the leading guidepost for country-level and international efforts to protect children and promote their well-being, and informs the Sustainable Development Goals integrating the protection from violence with child health, as benefiting the public health and global health targets. With seemingly shifting alliances among countries, the central focus on child rights as foundational and the driving force to child protection needs to remain as a cross-cutting, sustained commitment. Duty of care precedes the standards of care, and such standards are uppermost in need in our current socio-economic-political landscape.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
儿童保护和实践方面的考虑因素:现在什么是儿童保护?
在过去的 50 年里,全球社会就儿童权利达成了共识,从而为从以下三个基石来定义儿童保护奠定了基础:(1) 保护所有儿童在所有环境和背景下不受歧视地免受一切形式的暴力侵害;(2) 在儿童保护失败的情况下,在政府内部、向家庭和儿童提供支持,以促进儿童健康;(3) 儿童和青年的参与,以重视他们的生活经验和对影响其权利的成人决策的基于发展的理解。因此,儿童保护工作历来以国际为重点,基础广泛,在国家和国际范围内都有问责结构。当我们调查当前的一些情况时,儿童权利的落实似乎遇到了阻碍,无法在儿童福利制度的环境中实现儿童保护,但在冲突环境中更为明显。本文的讨论将引出在应对侵犯儿童权利的标准方面所需的讨论,以及制定预防性、保护性战略以维护全球儿童权利和全球儿童健康目标的法律共识的迫切需要。联合国《儿童权利公约》及其《任择议定书》仍然是国家和国际层面保护儿童和促进其福祉的主要指南,并为可持续发展目标提供了信息,将保护儿童免受暴力侵害与儿童健康结合起来,使公共卫生和全球健康目标受益。由于各国之间的联盟似乎在不断变化,作为儿童保护的基础和推动力,对儿童权利的核心关注需要继续作为贯穿各领域的持续承诺。照顾的责任先于照顾的标准,在我们当前的社会经济政治环境中,这种标准是最需要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Systematic review: Impact of juvenile incarceration Attitudes towards parents with a diagnosis of borderline personality disorder in child protection settings Silent group sandplay activates healing How could you help me? Children's voices on violence in child welfare files: A thematic analysis The use of technology and mobile health apps in child maltreatment interventions: Perspectives of TF-CBT therapists and SafeCare providers
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1