Fruit–frugivore dependencies are important in Ebolavirus outbreaks in Sub-Saharan Africa

IF 5.4 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION Ecography Pub Date : 2024-04-18 DOI:10.1111/ecog.06950
Mekala Sundaram, Mireya Dorado, Benedicta Akaribo, Antoine Filion, Barbara A. Han, Nicole L. Gottdenker, John P. Schmidt, John M. Drake, Patrick R. Stephens
{"title":"Fruit–frugivore dependencies are important in Ebolavirus outbreaks in Sub-Saharan Africa","authors":"Mekala Sundaram,&nbsp;Mireya Dorado,&nbsp;Benedicta Akaribo,&nbsp;Antoine Filion,&nbsp;Barbara A. Han,&nbsp;Nicole L. Gottdenker,&nbsp;John P. Schmidt,&nbsp;John M. Drake,&nbsp;Patrick R. Stephens","doi":"10.1111/ecog.06950","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Ebolaviruses have the ability to infect a wide variety of species, with many African mammals potentially serving either as primary reservoirs or secondary amplifying hosts. Previous work has shown that frugivorous bats and primates are often associated with spillover and outbreaks. Yet the role that patterns of biodiversity, either of mammalian hosts or of common fruiting species such as <i>Ficus</i> (figs, fruit resources used by a wide variety of species), play in driving outbreak risk remains unclear. We investigated what factors most directly influence <i>Ebolavirus</i> outbreak risk in Sub-Saharan Africa by using a phylogenetically informed path analysis to compare a wide array of potential models (path diagrams) of spatial dynamics. We considered mammalian frugivore richness, cercopithecid and hominid primate richness, richness of pteropodid (fruit) bats, the spatial distribution of species that have tested positive for <i>Ebolavirus</i> antibodies in the wild, <i>Ficus</i> habitat suitability, and environmental conditions (mean annual and variability in temperature and rainfall). The proximate factors that most influenced whether a given host species range contained a site of a previous outbreak event were 1) habitat suitability for <i>Ficus</i> and 2) the diversity of cercopithecid primates. Frugivore richness overall (including bats, primates, and a few other mammals) and the richness of bats in the family Pteropodidae had a strong effect on which species tested positive for <i>Ebolavirus</i> antibodies, but did not influence outbreak risk directly in pathways explored. We interpret this as evidence that foraging around <i>Ficus</i> and frugivorous mammals (such as cercopithecid primates which are commonly hunted for food) play a prominent role in driving outbreaks into human communities, relative to other factors we considered which influence outbreak risk more indirectly.</p>","PeriodicalId":51026,"journal":{"name":"Ecography","volume":"2024 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ecog.06950","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecography","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ecog.06950","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Ebolaviruses have the ability to infect a wide variety of species, with many African mammals potentially serving either as primary reservoirs or secondary amplifying hosts. Previous work has shown that frugivorous bats and primates are often associated with spillover and outbreaks. Yet the role that patterns of biodiversity, either of mammalian hosts or of common fruiting species such as Ficus (figs, fruit resources used by a wide variety of species), play in driving outbreak risk remains unclear. We investigated what factors most directly influence Ebolavirus outbreak risk in Sub-Saharan Africa by using a phylogenetically informed path analysis to compare a wide array of potential models (path diagrams) of spatial dynamics. We considered mammalian frugivore richness, cercopithecid and hominid primate richness, richness of pteropodid (fruit) bats, the spatial distribution of species that have tested positive for Ebolavirus antibodies in the wild, Ficus habitat suitability, and environmental conditions (mean annual and variability in temperature and rainfall). The proximate factors that most influenced whether a given host species range contained a site of a previous outbreak event were 1) habitat suitability for Ficus and 2) the diversity of cercopithecid primates. Frugivore richness overall (including bats, primates, and a few other mammals) and the richness of bats in the family Pteropodidae had a strong effect on which species tested positive for Ebolavirus antibodies, but did not influence outbreak risk directly in pathways explored. We interpret this as evidence that foraging around Ficus and frugivorous mammals (such as cercopithecid primates which are commonly hunted for food) play a prominent role in driving outbreaks into human communities, relative to other factors we considered which influence outbreak risk more indirectly.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在撒哈拉以南非洲爆发的埃博拉病毒疫情中,果食肉动物的依赖性非常重要
埃博拉病毒能够感染多种物种,许多非洲哺乳动物都有可能成为主要病毒库或次级扩增宿主。以前的研究表明,食俭的蝙蝠和灵长类动物往往与病毒外溢和爆发有关。然而,哺乳动物宿主或无花果等常见果实物种的生物多样性模式在疫情爆发风险中的作用仍不清楚。我们利用系统进化路径分析比较了一系列潜在的空间动态模型(路径图),研究了哪些因素对埃博拉病毒在撒哈拉以南非洲的爆发风险有最直接的影响。我们考虑了哺乳类食俭动物的丰富性、栉水母类和人科灵长类动物的丰富性、翼手目(果蝠)的丰富性、野外埃博拉病毒抗体检测呈阳性的物种的空间分布、榕树栖息地的适宜性以及环境条件(年平均气温和降雨量及其变化)。对特定宿主物种范围是否包含以前爆发疫情的地点影响最大的近因是:1)榕树栖息地的适宜性;2)栉水母类灵长类动物的多样性。食草动物(包括蝙蝠、灵长类动物和其他一些哺乳动物)的总体丰富程度和翼足目蝙蝠科的丰富程度对哪些物种的埃博拉病毒抗体检测呈阳性有很大影响,但在所探讨的途径中并不直接影响疫情爆发风险。我们将此解释为,相对于我们考虑的其他更间接地影响疫情爆发风险的因素而言,榕树周围的觅食活动和节食哺乳动物(如通常被猎杀为食的栉水母类灵长类动物)在促使疫情爆发进入人类社区方面发挥了重要作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Ecography
Ecography 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
11.60
自引率
3.40%
发文量
122
审稿时长
8-16 weeks
期刊介绍: ECOGRAPHY publishes exciting, novel, and important articles that significantly advance understanding of ecological or biodiversity patterns in space or time. Papers focusing on conservation or restoration are welcomed, provided they are anchored in ecological theory and convey a general message that goes beyond a single case study. We encourage papers that seek advancing the field through the development and testing of theory or methodology, or by proposing new tools for analysis or interpretation of ecological phenomena. Manuscripts are expected to address general principles in ecology, though they may do so using a specific model system if they adequately frame the problem relative to a generalized ecological question or problem. Purely descriptive papers are considered only if breaking new ground and/or describing patterns seldom explored. Studies focused on a single species or single location are generally discouraged unless they make a significant contribution to advancing general theory or understanding of biodiversity patterns and processes. Manuscripts merely confirming or marginally extending results of previous work are unlikely to be considered in Ecography. Papers are judged by virtue of their originality, appeal to general interest, and their contribution to new developments in studies of spatial and temporal ecological patterns. There are no biases with regard to taxon, biome, or biogeographical area.
期刊最新文献
Colonization and extinction lags drive non-linear responses to warming in mountain plant communities across the Northern Hemisphere Differential predation patterns of free-ranging cats among continents Competitive interactions modify the direct effects of climate Achieving higher standards in species distribution modeling by leveraging the diversity of available software Seasonal macro-demography of North American bird populations revealed through participatory science
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1