Evaluating extinct pseudosuchian body mass estimates using a femur volume‐based model

Holly N. Woodward, Paul Aubier, Mariana Valéria Araújo de Sena, Jorge Cubo
{"title":"Evaluating extinct pseudosuchian body mass estimates using a femur volume‐based model","authors":"Holly N. Woodward, Paul Aubier, Mariana Valéria Araújo de Sena, Jorge Cubo","doi":"10.1002/ar.25452","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The clade Pseudosuchia appeared 250 million years ago. The exclusively semi‐aquatic Crocodylia, which includes crocodiles, alligators, caimans, and gharials is the only surviving subgroup. Investigating Crocodylia biology is pivotal for inferring traits of extinct pseudosuchians. <jats:italic>Alligator</jats:italic> femur length is widely used for modeling pseudosuchian body mass, but the regression is influenced by sex and captivity status, leading to potential accuracy problems. An alternative model results from the correlation between alligator femur volume and body mass, which is unaffected by those covariates. Here, an alligator femur volume‐based regression is applied to estimate the masses of non‐crocodylian pseudosuchians, encompassing goniopholids, dyrosaurs, notosuchians, and thalattosuchians. For each, femur volume as the predictor yields lower body masses than does femur length. Morphological resemblances to existing crocodylians support the inference that extinct goniopholids and dyrosaurs were semi‐aquatic. Therefore, body masses predicted from femur length and volume should be reasonable, although larger body masses obtained from femur length may reflect sensitivity to sex or environmental factors. Fully terrestrial notosuchians had proportionately longer femora for their body sizes compared to semi‐aquatic crocodylians, suggesting that the higher body masses predicted from alligator femur length are overestimates. Fully aquatic thalattosuchians, skeletally adapted for buoyancy and with reduced reliance on the femur for locomotion, pose challenges for both femur length and volume‐based models. The results of this study advocate for the use of femur volume to predict body mass, particularly for semi‐aquatic and terrestrial pseudosuchians, and encourage further exploration of volumetric models as body size predictors for extinct vertebrates.","PeriodicalId":22308,"journal":{"name":"The Anatomical Record: Advances in Integrative Anatomy and Evolutionary Biology","volume":"13 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Anatomical Record: Advances in Integrative Anatomy and Evolutionary Biology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ar.25452","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The clade Pseudosuchia appeared 250 million years ago. The exclusively semi‐aquatic Crocodylia, which includes crocodiles, alligators, caimans, and gharials is the only surviving subgroup. Investigating Crocodylia biology is pivotal for inferring traits of extinct pseudosuchians. Alligator femur length is widely used for modeling pseudosuchian body mass, but the regression is influenced by sex and captivity status, leading to potential accuracy problems. An alternative model results from the correlation between alligator femur volume and body mass, which is unaffected by those covariates. Here, an alligator femur volume‐based regression is applied to estimate the masses of non‐crocodylian pseudosuchians, encompassing goniopholids, dyrosaurs, notosuchians, and thalattosuchians. For each, femur volume as the predictor yields lower body masses than does femur length. Morphological resemblances to existing crocodylians support the inference that extinct goniopholids and dyrosaurs were semi‐aquatic. Therefore, body masses predicted from femur length and volume should be reasonable, although larger body masses obtained from femur length may reflect sensitivity to sex or environmental factors. Fully terrestrial notosuchians had proportionately longer femora for their body sizes compared to semi‐aquatic crocodylians, suggesting that the higher body masses predicted from alligator femur length are overestimates. Fully aquatic thalattosuchians, skeletally adapted for buoyancy and with reduced reliance on the femur for locomotion, pose challenges for both femur length and volume‐based models. The results of this study advocate for the use of femur volume to predict body mass, particularly for semi‐aquatic and terrestrial pseudosuchians, and encourage further exploration of volumetric models as body size predictors for extinct vertebrates.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用基于股骨体积的模型评估已灭绝伪蜥的体重估计值
伪蜥支系出现于 2.5 亿年前。鳄科(Crocodylia)是唯一幸存的半水生类群,包括鳄鱼、短吻鳄、凯门鳄和长尾鳄。调查鳄科动物的生物学特征对于推断已灭绝的伪蜥形纲动物的特征至关重要。短吻鳄的股骨长度被广泛用于伪蜥的体重建模,但回归结果受性别和圈养状态的影响,可能导致准确性问题。鳄鱼股骨体积与身体质量之间的相关性产生了一个替代模型,它不受这些协变量的影响。在此,我们采用基于鳄鱼股骨体积的回归方法来估算非鳄类伪蜥形纲动物的体重,其中包括长鼻龙类、侏儒龙类、腕足动物类和长尾蜥形纲动物。对每一种伪蜥来说,以股骨体积作为预测指标所得出的体重都比股骨长度低。与现存鳄龙类的形态相似性支持了这样的推论,即已灭绝的巨吻龙和堤龙是半水栖动物。因此,根据股骨长度和体积预测的体重应该是合理的,尽管根据股骨长度得出的较大体重可能反映了性别或环境因素的敏感性。与半水栖鳄类相比,完全陆生的腕足动物的股骨与其体型成比例地长,这表明根据鳄鱼股骨长度预测的较高体质量是高估了。完全水栖的长尾巨鳄的骨骼适应浮力,并减少了对股骨运动的依赖,这对股骨长度和基于体积的模型都提出了挑战。本研究的结果主张使用股骨体积来预测体重,尤其是半水栖和陆栖伪蜥类的体重,并鼓励进一步探索将体积模型作为已灭绝脊椎动物的体型预测指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Anatomical description of a pygmy sperm whale, Kogia breviceps (Cetacea: Kogiidae), pre‐term calf using CT scan and 3D reconstructions New Glires materials from the East Mesa, Erlian Basin (Nei Mongol, China) Morphological diversity of saber‐tooth upper canines and its functional implications Evaluating extinct pseudosuchian body mass estimates using a femur volume‐based model Postcranial anomalies of Eocene freshwater pleurodiran and cryptodiran turtles from the Spanish Duero Basin
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1