Obstetrician views on Fetal Pillow® device use and research in Aotearoa New Zealand: A cross‐sectional survey

Lynn Sadler, Robin Cronin, Erena Browne, Amanda Harvey, Meghan G Hill
{"title":"Obstetrician views on Fetal Pillow® device use and research in Aotearoa New Zealand: A cross‐sectional survey","authors":"Lynn Sadler, Robin Cronin, Erena Browne, Amanda Harvey, Meghan G Hill","doi":"10.1111/ajo.13824","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BackgroundThere is anecdotal evidence of Fetal Pillow® use, but no formal local information on clinician practices and perspectives.AimsTo assess obstetrician use of the Fetal Pillow®, knowledge of relevant research, and interest in a proposed randomised controlled trial in Aotearoa New Zealand.Materials and MethodsAnonymous cross‐sectional survey of practising obstetricians and obstetric trainees in Aotearoa New Zealand distributed by the Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists.ResultsOf 136 respondents (69% specialists and 31% trainees), 130 had heard of the Fetal Pillow® device, and 108 had used it at least once (43% more than ten times). The device was available in 17/21 units represented. The 108 users of the device reported this was most commonly on collegial advice (63%) or after personal experience of a difficult delivery (33%) and most (80%) believed it reduced maternal morbidity. Only around one‐third of the 130 respondents who had heard of the device agreed there was adequate research demonstrating its efficacy for maternal (36%) and neonatal (30%) morbidity. The majority reported they would change practice in response to a randomised trial, although they were more likely to start use (81% of current non‐users) than stop (53% of users). Most (70%) respondents agreed they would encourage patients to participate in a randomised trial.ConclusionsThe Fetal Pillow® is available in most maternity units in Aotearoa New Zealand. The majority of obstetric clinicians believe it reduces maternal morbidity, while acknowledging the lack of scientific evidence. Most would support a randomised trial.","PeriodicalId":8599,"journal":{"name":"Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ajo.13824","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BackgroundThere is anecdotal evidence of Fetal Pillow® use, but no formal local information on clinician practices and perspectives.AimsTo assess obstetrician use of the Fetal Pillow®, knowledge of relevant research, and interest in a proposed randomised controlled trial in Aotearoa New Zealand.Materials and MethodsAnonymous cross‐sectional survey of practising obstetricians and obstetric trainees in Aotearoa New Zealand distributed by the Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists.ResultsOf 136 respondents (69% specialists and 31% trainees), 130 had heard of the Fetal Pillow® device, and 108 had used it at least once (43% more than ten times). The device was available in 17/21 units represented. The 108 users of the device reported this was most commonly on collegial advice (63%) or after personal experience of a difficult delivery (33%) and most (80%) believed it reduced maternal morbidity. Only around one‐third of the 130 respondents who had heard of the device agreed there was adequate research demonstrating its efficacy for maternal (36%) and neonatal (30%) morbidity. The majority reported they would change practice in response to a randomised trial, although they were more likely to start use (81% of current non‐users) than stop (53% of users). Most (70%) respondents agreed they would encourage patients to participate in a randomised trial.ConclusionsThe Fetal Pillow® is available in most maternity units in Aotearoa New Zealand. The majority of obstetric clinicians believe it reduces maternal morbidity, while acknowledging the lack of scientific evidence. Most would support a randomised trial.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
产科医生对新西兰奥特亚罗瓦地区胎枕®装置使用和研究的看法:横断面调查
背景有使用胎儿枕®的轶事证据,但没有关于临床医生实践和观点的正式本地信息。目的评估产科医生对胎儿枕®的使用情况、对相关研究的了解以及对新西兰奥特亚罗瓦拟议随机对照试验的兴趣。结果在 136 名受访者(69% 为专家,31% 为受训者)中,130 人听说过 Fetal Pillow® 设备,108 人至少使用过一次(43% 超过 10 次)。该装置有 17/21 种型号。108 名胎儿枕® 使用者称,使用该装置最常见的原因是同事的建议(63%)或个人的难产经历(33%),大多数人(80%)认为该装置降低了产妇的发病率。在 130 位听说过该装置的受访者中,只有约三分之一的人同意有足够的研究证明其对产妇(36%)和新生儿(30%)发病率的疗效。大多数受访者表示,他们会根据随机试验的结果改变自己的做法,尽管他们更倾向于开始使用(81% 的未使用者)而不是停止使用(53% 的使用者)。大多数受访者(70%)同意他们会鼓励患者参与随机试验。大多数产科临床医生认为它能降低产妇发病率,同时也承认缺乏科学证据。大多数人支持进行随机试验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Pregnancy in women with mitochondrial disease—A literature review and suggested guidance for preconception and pregnancy care Correction to the abstracts of Annual Scientific Meeting of the Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RANZCOG), 28 October – 1 November 2023 Investigation of the quality and health literacy demand of online information on pelvic floor exercises to reduce stress urinary incontinence Why does hormonal contraception and menopausal hormonal treatment have such a small effect on breast cancer risk? Antenatal health and perinatal outcomes of Pacific Islander women in Australia with and without gestational diabetes: A ten‐year retrospective cohort study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1