A transformative shift in urban ecology toward a more active and relevant future for the field and for cities

IF 5.8 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL Ambio Pub Date : 2024-04-20 DOI:10.1007/s13280-024-01992-y
Niki Frantzeskaki, Daniel L. Childers, Steward Pickett, Fushcia-Ann Hoover, Pippin Anderson, Aliyu Barau, Joshua Ginsberg, Morgan Grove, Marleen Lodder, Ariel E. Lugo, Timon McPhearson, Tischa A. Muñoz-Erickson, Mien Quartier, Selina Schepers, Ayyoob Sharifi, Katrien van de Sijpe
{"title":"A transformative shift in urban ecology toward a more active and relevant future for the field and for cities","authors":"Niki Frantzeskaki,&nbsp;Daniel L. Childers,&nbsp;Steward Pickett,&nbsp;Fushcia-Ann Hoover,&nbsp;Pippin Anderson,&nbsp;Aliyu Barau,&nbsp;Joshua Ginsberg,&nbsp;Morgan Grove,&nbsp;Marleen Lodder,&nbsp;Ariel E. Lugo,&nbsp;Timon McPhearson,&nbsp;Tischa A. Muñoz-Erickson,&nbsp;Mien Quartier,&nbsp;Selina Schepers,&nbsp;Ayyoob Sharifi,&nbsp;Katrien van de Sijpe","doi":"10.1007/s13280-024-01992-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This paper builds on the expansion of urban ecology from a biologically based discipline—ecology <i>in</i> the city—to an increasingly interdisciplinary field—ecology <i>of</i> the city—to a transdisciplinary, knowledge to action endeavor—an ecology <i>for</i> and <i>with</i> the city. We build on this “prepositional journey” by proposing a transformative shift in urban ecology, and we present a framework for how the field may continue this shift. We conceptualize that urban ecology is in a state of flux, and that this shift is needed to transform urban ecology into a more engaged and action based field, and one that includes a diversity of actors willing to participate in the future of their cities. In this transformative shift, these actors will engage, collaborate, and participate in a continuous spiral of knowledge → action → knowledge spiral and back to knowledge loop, with the goal of co producing sustainable and resilient solutions to myriad urban challenges. Our framework for this transformative shift includes three pathways: (1) a repeating knowledge → action → knowledge spiral of ideas, information, and solutions produced by a diverse community of agents of urban change working together in an “urban sandbox”; (2) incorporation of a social–ecological–technological systems framework in this spiral and expanding the spiral temporally to include the “deep future,” where future scenarios are based on a visioning of seemingly unimaginable or plausible future states of cities that are sustainable and resilient; and (3) the expansion of the spiral in space, to include rural areas and places that are not yet cities. The three interrelated pathways that define the transformative shift demonstrate the power of an urban ecology that has moved beyond urban systems science and into a realm where collaborations among diverse knowledges and voices are working together to understand cities and what is urban while producing sustainable solutions to contemporary challenges and envisioning futures of socially, ecologically, and technologically resilient cities. We present case study examples of each of the three pathways that make up this transformative shift in urban ecology and discuss both limitations and opportunities for future research and action with this transdisciplinary broadening of the field.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":461,"journal":{"name":"Ambio","volume":"53 6","pages":"871 - 889"},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s13280-024-01992-y.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ambio","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13280-024-01992-y","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper builds on the expansion of urban ecology from a biologically based discipline—ecology in the city—to an increasingly interdisciplinary field—ecology of the city—to a transdisciplinary, knowledge to action endeavor—an ecology for and with the city. We build on this “prepositional journey” by proposing a transformative shift in urban ecology, and we present a framework for how the field may continue this shift. We conceptualize that urban ecology is in a state of flux, and that this shift is needed to transform urban ecology into a more engaged and action based field, and one that includes a diversity of actors willing to participate in the future of their cities. In this transformative shift, these actors will engage, collaborate, and participate in a continuous spiral of knowledge → action → knowledge spiral and back to knowledge loop, with the goal of co producing sustainable and resilient solutions to myriad urban challenges. Our framework for this transformative shift includes three pathways: (1) a repeating knowledge → action → knowledge spiral of ideas, information, and solutions produced by a diverse community of agents of urban change working together in an “urban sandbox”; (2) incorporation of a social–ecological–technological systems framework in this spiral and expanding the spiral temporally to include the “deep future,” where future scenarios are based on a visioning of seemingly unimaginable or plausible future states of cities that are sustainable and resilient; and (3) the expansion of the spiral in space, to include rural areas and places that are not yet cities. The three interrelated pathways that define the transformative shift demonstrate the power of an urban ecology that has moved beyond urban systems science and into a realm where collaborations among diverse knowledges and voices are working together to understand cities and what is urban while producing sustainable solutions to contemporary challenges and envisioning futures of socially, ecologically, and technologically resilient cities. We present case study examples of each of the three pathways that make up this transformative shift in urban ecology and discuss both limitations and opportunities for future research and action with this transdisciplinary broadening of the field.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
城市生态学的变革性转变,为该领域和城市带来更积极、更相关的未来
城市生态学从一门以生物为基础的学科--城市生态学--扩展到一个日益跨学科的领域--城市生态学--再扩展到一个从知识到行动的跨学科领域--为城市生态学和与城市生态学。在这一 "前言之旅 "的基础上,我们提出了城市生态学的转型,并为该领域如何继续这一转型提出了一个框架。我们认为,城市生态学正处于一种变化状态,需要这种转变来将城市生态学转变为一个更加参与和以行动为基础的领域,一个包括愿意参与城市未来的各种参与者的领域。在这一转变过程中,这些参与者将参与、合作,并在知识→行动→知识螺旋式上升再回到知识循环的过程中不断参与,目标是共同为无数城市挑战提供可持续的、有弹性的解决方案。我们的转型框架包括三个途径:(1) 在 "城市沙盘 "中,由不同的城市变革推动者群体共同合作,不断重复知识→行动→知 识螺旋式上升的过程,产生想法、信息和解决方案;(2) 将社会-生态-技术系统框架纳入这一螺旋式上升过程,并在时间上将螺旋式上升过程扩展到 "深度未来",在 "深度未来 "中,未来情景是基于对城市可持续发展和复原力的看似难以想象或可信的未来状态的设想;以及 (3) 在空间上将螺旋式上升过程扩展到农村地区和尚未建成城市的地方。这三个相互关联的途径定义了转型的转变,展示了城市生态学的力量,它已经超越了城市系统科学,进入了一个不同知识和声音相互协作的领域,共同理解城市和城市是什么,同时为当代挑战提供可持续的解决方案,并展望未来具有社会、生态和技术复原力的城市。我们介绍了构成城市生态学这一变革性转变的三条途径中每一条途径的案例研究,并讨论了这一跨学科领域拓宽后未来研究和行动的局限性和机遇。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Ambio
Ambio 环境科学-工程:环境
CiteScore
14.30
自引率
3.10%
发文量
123
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Explores the link between anthropogenic activities and the environment, Ambio encourages multi- or interdisciplinary submissions with explicit management or policy recommendations. Ambio addresses the scientific, social, economic, and cultural factors that influence the condition of the human environment. Ambio particularly encourages multi- or inter-disciplinary submissions with explicit management or policy recommendations. For more than 45 years Ambio has brought international perspective to important developments in environmental research, policy and related activities for an international readership of specialists, generalists, students, decision-makers and interested laymen.
期刊最新文献
Recurrent discharges of non-petroleum substances from chemical tankers in Swedish marine Natura 2000 sites are against the aims of EU Directives. Reaping what we sow: Centering values in food systems transformations research. Looking back to shape the future: Trajectories and resilience of social–ecological systems in the Global South Business-as-usual trends will largely miss 2030 global conservation targets. Towards biocultural realism: Connecting conservation with historical ecology and common sense. A European perspective.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1