Numerical simulation of shelter effect assessment for single-row windbreaks on the periphery of oasis farmland

IF 2.6 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ECOLOGY Journal of Arid Environments Pub Date : 2024-04-23 DOI:10.1016/j.jaridenv.2024.105165
Chenchen He , Wenyan Shao
{"title":"Numerical simulation of shelter effect assessment for single-row windbreaks on the periphery of oasis farmland","authors":"Chenchen He ,&nbsp;Wenyan Shao","doi":"10.1016/j.jaridenv.2024.105165","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Dust storms, resulting from aeolian erosion, pose significant environmental hazards, while farmland is one of the main sources of dust storm release. An effective strategy to mitigate surface wind speed and curb dust emissions involves the establishment of windbreaks on the periphery of oasis farmland. This study conducts a series of numerical simulations using computational fluid dynamics (CFD) to explore the airflow fields around windbreaks with diverse systematic structural parameters, encompassing porosity, planting spacing, and fence effects. The main findings are as follows: (1) When the vegetation porosity is consistent (e.g., porosity <em>α</em> = 0.7, 0.8, and 0.9), exact geometry results can effectively reflect the distribution of wall shear stress, while the porous medium model overlooks these details. (2) The “Venturi effect” contributes to the acceleration of surface erosion and improper planting spacing results in an elevation of near-surface velocity. Planting spacing of 0.5 <em>m</em> demonstrates superior wind speed reduction performance, mitigating aeolian erosion and accumulation. (3) When the fence is positioned at <em>l</em> = 5<em>h</em> (<em>h</em> represents the height of the windbreaks), the flow field around the windbreaks is minimally influenced. The optimal placement distance for fences should be close to the windbreaks, featuring minimal porosity (<em>l</em> = 0 <em>h</em>, <em>α</em> = 0.1), extending the shelter distance from 3 to 4 <em>h</em> to 5–6 <em>h</em>. The research results can provide a theoretical basis for optimizing the plant configuration of biological desertification control and soil erosion control measures.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51080,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Arid Environments","volume":"222 ","pages":"Article 105165"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Arid Environments","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140196324000454","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Dust storms, resulting from aeolian erosion, pose significant environmental hazards, while farmland is one of the main sources of dust storm release. An effective strategy to mitigate surface wind speed and curb dust emissions involves the establishment of windbreaks on the periphery of oasis farmland. This study conducts a series of numerical simulations using computational fluid dynamics (CFD) to explore the airflow fields around windbreaks with diverse systematic structural parameters, encompassing porosity, planting spacing, and fence effects. The main findings are as follows: (1) When the vegetation porosity is consistent (e.g., porosity α = 0.7, 0.8, and 0.9), exact geometry results can effectively reflect the distribution of wall shear stress, while the porous medium model overlooks these details. (2) The “Venturi effect” contributes to the acceleration of surface erosion and improper planting spacing results in an elevation of near-surface velocity. Planting spacing of 0.5 m demonstrates superior wind speed reduction performance, mitigating aeolian erosion and accumulation. (3) When the fence is positioned at l = 5h (h represents the height of the windbreaks), the flow field around the windbreaks is minimally influenced. The optimal placement distance for fences should be close to the windbreaks, featuring minimal porosity (l = 0 h, α = 0.1), extending the shelter distance from 3 to 4 h to 5–6 h. The research results can provide a theoretical basis for optimizing the plant configuration of biological desertification control and soil erosion control measures.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
绿洲农田外围单排防风林的遮蔽效果评估数值模拟
风化侵蚀产生的沙尘暴对环境造成严重危害,而农田是沙尘暴的主要释放源之一。在绿洲农田外围建立防风林是减缓地表风速和遏制沙尘排放的有效策略。本研究利用计算流体动力学(CFD)进行了一系列数值模拟,探讨了不同系统结构参数(包括孔隙率、种植间距和围栏效应)下防风林周围的气流场。主要研究结果如下(1) 当植被孔隙率一致时(如孔隙率 α = 0.7、0.8 和 0.9),精确几何结果可有效反映墙壁剪应力的分布,而多孔介质模型则会忽略这些细节。(2) "文丘里效应 "会加速地表侵蚀,不适当的种植间距会导致近地表速度上升。0.5 米的种植间距能有效降低风速,减轻风蚀和堆积。(3) 当围栏的位置为 l = 5h(h 代表防风林的高度)时,防风林周围的流场受到的影响最小。栅栏的最佳布置距离应靠近防风林,孔隙度最小(l = 0 h,α = 0.1),遮挡距离从 3 至 4 h 延长到 5 至 6 h。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Arid Environments
Journal of Arid Environments 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
3.70%
发文量
144
审稿时长
55 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Arid Environments is an international journal publishing original scientific and technical research articles on physical, biological and cultural aspects of arid, semi-arid, and desert environments. As a forum of multi-disciplinary and interdisciplinary dialogue it addresses research on all aspects of arid environments and their past, present and future use.
期刊最新文献
Projectiles from Yemen? A unique discovery of geometric microliths in a mortuary site of the mid-first millennium BCE in the Negev Highlands, Israel Navigating climate shifts for an endemic lizard from a semi-arid environment Valuing drought impact mitigation on ecosystem services in a Mediterranean country Resource allocation below- and above-ground organs and their association to the environment in Mammillaria Haw. (Cactaceae) Think outside the road: Negev connectivity beyond the ‘Nabatean incense route’
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1