People are surprisingly hesitant to reach out to old friends

Lara B. Aknin, Gillian M. Sandstrom
{"title":"People are surprisingly hesitant to reach out to old friends","authors":"Lara B. Aknin, Gillian M. Sandstrom","doi":"10.1038/s44271-024-00075-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Social relationships provide one of the most reliable paths to happiness, but relationships can fade for various reasons. While it does not take much to reinitiate contact, here we find that people are surprisingly reluctant to do so. Specifically, most people reported losing touch with an old friend yet expressed little interest in reaching out (Studies 1-2, Ns = 401 and 199). Moreover, fewer than one third of participants sent a message to an old friend, even when they wanted to, thought the friend would be appreciative, had the friend’s contact information, and were given time to draft and send a message (Studies 3-4, Ns = 453 and 604). One reason for this reluctance may be that old friends feel like strangers. Supporting this possibility, participants were no more willing to reach out to an old friend than they were to talk to a stranger (Study 5, N = 288), and were less willing to contact old friends who felt more like strangers (Study 6, N = 319). Therefore, in Study 7 (N = 194), we adapted an intervention shown to ease anxieties about talking to strangers and found that it increased the number of people who reached out to an old friend by two-thirds. Individuals seldom reach out to old friends with whom they have lost touch. Interventions focused on changing attitudes were ineffective, but practicing reaching out to current friends first successfully encouraged people to reach out to old friends.","PeriodicalId":501698,"journal":{"name":"Communications Psychology","volume":" ","pages":"1-12"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s44271-024-00075-8.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Communications Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s44271-024-00075-8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Social relationships provide one of the most reliable paths to happiness, but relationships can fade for various reasons. While it does not take much to reinitiate contact, here we find that people are surprisingly reluctant to do so. Specifically, most people reported losing touch with an old friend yet expressed little interest in reaching out (Studies 1-2, Ns = 401 and 199). Moreover, fewer than one third of participants sent a message to an old friend, even when they wanted to, thought the friend would be appreciative, had the friend’s contact information, and were given time to draft and send a message (Studies 3-4, Ns = 453 and 604). One reason for this reluctance may be that old friends feel like strangers. Supporting this possibility, participants were no more willing to reach out to an old friend than they were to talk to a stranger (Study 5, N = 288), and were less willing to contact old friends who felt more like strangers (Study 6, N = 319). Therefore, in Study 7 (N = 194), we adapted an intervention shown to ease anxieties about talking to strangers and found that it increased the number of people who reached out to an old friend by two-thirds. Individuals seldom reach out to old friends with whom they have lost touch. Interventions focused on changing attitudes were ineffective, but practicing reaching out to current friends first successfully encouraged people to reach out to old friends.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
人们在联系老朋友时出奇地犹豫不决
社会关系是通往幸福的最可靠途径之一,但由于种种原因,人际关系可能会淡化。虽然重新建立联系并不需要花费太多时间,但我们发现人们却出人意料地不愿意这样做。具体来说,大多数人表示与老朋友失去了联系,但却没有兴趣主动联系(研究 1-2,人数 = 401 和 199)。此外,只有不到三分之一的参与者向老朋友发送了信息,即使他们想这样做,认为朋友会感激他们,有朋友的联系方式,并且有时间起草和发送信息(研究 3-4,人数 = 453 和 604)。这种不情愿的原因之一可能是老朋友给人的感觉就像陌生人。为了证实这种可能性,参与者主动联系老朋友的意愿并不比与陌生人交谈的意愿高(研究 5,人数 = 288),而且他们更不愿意联系感觉更像陌生人的老朋友(研究 6,人数 = 319)。因此,在研究 7(N = 194)中,我们调整了一项干预措施,该措施被证明可以缓解与陌生人交谈时的焦虑,结果发现该措施使主动联系老朋友的人数增加了三分之二。人们很少主动联系失去联系的老朋友。以改变态度为重点的干预措施效果不佳,但先与现在的朋友联系的做法成功地鼓励了人们与老朋友联系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A dissociation between the use of implicit and explicit priors in perceptual inference. Adaptive empathic response selection is sensitive to multiple dimensions of social interaction. Parent-child relationship quality predicts higher subjective well-being in adulthood across a diverse group of countries Sensory stimulation enhances visual working memory capacity Psychoacoustic and Archeoacoustic nature of ancient Aztec skull whistles
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1