Evaluation of Ornidazole Tablets Bioequivalence in Chinese Healthy Participants Under Fasted and Fed Conditions Using Pharmacokinetic Parameters

Yanrong Wang, Yuanyuan He, Weihong Li, Hongmin LI, Liyuan Tang, Xinya Dai, Yingzi Pei, Lijing Gao
{"title":"Evaluation of Ornidazole Tablets Bioequivalence in Chinese Healthy Participants Under Fasted and Fed Conditions Using Pharmacokinetic Parameters","authors":"Yanrong Wang, Yuanyuan He, Weihong Li, Hongmin LI, Liyuan Tang, Xinya Dai, Yingzi Pei, Lijing Gao","doi":"10.1007/s40268-024-00457-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Background and Objective</h3><p>Ornidazole, the third generation of nitroimidazole derivatives after metronidazole and tinidazole, it exerts both bactericidal and antiprotozoal effects. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the pharmacokinetic and bioequivalence of two ornidazole tablets manufactured by two different manufacturers based on their pharmacokinetic parameters.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Patients and Methods</h3><p>Fasted and fed healthy Chinese volunteers participated in a randomized sequence, single-dose, open-label, two-period crossover trial. There were 24 participants in both the fed study and the fasted study. Following a 7-day washout period before receiving the alternative formulation, eligible research participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive a single dosage of either the reference formulation or the test formulation. Following tablet administration, plasma samples were obtained over 72 h and analyzed using liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC–MS/MS) to evaluate ornidazole contents. maximum plasma concentration (<i>C</i><sub>max</sub>), time to <i>C</i><sub>max</sub> (<i>T</i><sub>max</sub>), the area under the curve (AUC) from <i>t</i> = 0 to infinity (AUC<sub>0–∞</sub>), AUC from <i>t</i> = 0 to the last quantifiable concentration (AUC<sub>0–<i>t</i></sub>), half-life (<i>t</i><sub>1/2</sub>), and terminal elimination rate constant (<i>z</i>) were evaluated as pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters. The safety evaluation involved adverse events (AEs) incidence and alterations in laboratory tests (hepatic function, blood biochemistry, hematology, and urinalysis) or vital signs (temperature, pulse, and blood pressure).</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>For the bioequivalence assessment in the fast trial, the prime PK parameters comparison between the reference and test formulation revealed that the GMR (90% CI) values for AUC<sub>0–<i>t</i></sub>, <i>C</i><sub>max</sub>, and AUC<sub>0–∞</sub> were 100.97% (99.12–102.85%), 99.88% (90.63–110.08%), and 101.12% (99.17–103.11%), respectively. For the bioequivalence assessment in the fed trial, the key PK parameters comparison between the reference and test formulations revealed that the GMR (90% CI) values for AUC<sub>0–<i>t</i></sub>, <i>C</i><sub>max</sub>, and AUC<sub>0–∞</sub> were 103.00% (100.94–105.11%), 101.90% (99.63–104.22%), and 102.99% (100.87–105.16%), respectively. The geometric mean ratios (GMRs) for the primary pharmacokinetic parameters (<i>C</i><sub>max</sub>, AUC<sub>0–72</sub>, and AUC<sub>0–∞</sub>) between the two formulations and the corresponding 90% confidence intervals (CIs) were all within the range of 80.00–125.00% for both the fasting and fed states. Both treatments have comparable safety profiles.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusion</h3><p>The bioequivalence and tolerability of ornidazole tablet reference and test formulations were evaluated among healthy Chinese participants under both fasting and fed conditions. The results indicated that both formulations were bioequivalent and generally well tolerated; besides, the interaction between food and drug may affect drug pharmacokinetics.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Trial Registration</h3><p>CTR20212873, registered on 15 November 2021; ChiCTR2300069098, registered on 7 March 2023.</p>","PeriodicalId":11373,"journal":{"name":"Drugs in R & D","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Drugs in R & D","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40268-024-00457-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and Objective

Ornidazole, the third generation of nitroimidazole derivatives after metronidazole and tinidazole, it exerts both bactericidal and antiprotozoal effects. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the pharmacokinetic and bioequivalence of two ornidazole tablets manufactured by two different manufacturers based on their pharmacokinetic parameters.

Patients and Methods

Fasted and fed healthy Chinese volunteers participated in a randomized sequence, single-dose, open-label, two-period crossover trial. There were 24 participants in both the fed study and the fasted study. Following a 7-day washout period before receiving the alternative formulation, eligible research participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive a single dosage of either the reference formulation or the test formulation. Following tablet administration, plasma samples were obtained over 72 h and analyzed using liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC–MS/MS) to evaluate ornidazole contents. maximum plasma concentration (Cmax), time to Cmax (Tmax), the area under the curve (AUC) from t = 0 to infinity (AUC0–∞), AUC from t = 0 to the last quantifiable concentration (AUC0–t), half-life (t1/2), and terminal elimination rate constant (z) were evaluated as pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters. The safety evaluation involved adverse events (AEs) incidence and alterations in laboratory tests (hepatic function, blood biochemistry, hematology, and urinalysis) or vital signs (temperature, pulse, and blood pressure).

Results

For the bioequivalence assessment in the fast trial, the prime PK parameters comparison between the reference and test formulation revealed that the GMR (90% CI) values for AUC0–t, Cmax, and AUC0–∞ were 100.97% (99.12–102.85%), 99.88% (90.63–110.08%), and 101.12% (99.17–103.11%), respectively. For the bioequivalence assessment in the fed trial, the key PK parameters comparison between the reference and test formulations revealed that the GMR (90% CI) values for AUC0–t, Cmax, and AUC0–∞ were 103.00% (100.94–105.11%), 101.90% (99.63–104.22%), and 102.99% (100.87–105.16%), respectively. The geometric mean ratios (GMRs) for the primary pharmacokinetic parameters (Cmax, AUC0–72, and AUC0–∞) between the two formulations and the corresponding 90% confidence intervals (CIs) were all within the range of 80.00–125.00% for both the fasting and fed states. Both treatments have comparable safety profiles.

Conclusion

The bioequivalence and tolerability of ornidazole tablet reference and test formulations were evaluated among healthy Chinese participants under both fasting and fed conditions. The results indicated that both formulations were bioequivalent and generally well tolerated; besides, the interaction between food and drug may affect drug pharmacokinetics.

Trial Registration

CTR20212873, registered on 15 November 2021; ChiCTR2300069098, registered on 7 March 2023.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用药代动力学参数评估空腹和进食条件下中国健康人服用奥硝唑片的生物等效性
背景和目的奥硝唑是继甲硝唑和替硝唑之后的第三代硝基咪唑衍生物,具有杀菌和抗原虫作用。本研究的目的是根据两个不同厂家生产的两种奥硝唑片剂的药代动力学参数,评估其药代动力学和生物等效性。共有 24 人参加了进食研究和禁食研究。在接受替代制剂前的 7 天缓冲期后,符合条件的研究参与者被随机分配(1:1)接受参考制剂或试验制剂的单剂量。服用片剂后,在 72 小时内采集血浆样本,并使用液相色谱串联质谱法(LC-MS/MS)进行分析,以评估奥硝唑的含量。药代动力学(PK)参数包括最大血浆浓度(Cmax)、达到 Cmax 的时间(Tmax)、从 t = 0 到无穷大的曲线下面积(AUC)(AUC0-∞)、从 t = 0 到最后可定量浓度的 AUC(AUC0-t)、半衰期(t1/2)和终末消除速率常数(z)。安全性评价包括不良事件(AEs)发生率和实验室检查(肝功能、血液生化、血液学和尿液分析)或生命体征(体温、脉搏和血压)的变化。结果在快速试验的生物等效性评估中,参比制剂和试验制剂的主要 PK 参数比较显示,AUC0-t、Cmax 和 AUC0-∞ 的 GMR(90% CI)值分别为 100.97%(99.12-102.85%)、99.88%(90.63-110.08%)和 101.12%(99.17-103.11%)。在喂养试验的生物等效性评估中,参比制剂和试验制剂的主要 PK 参数比较显示,AUC0-t、Cmax 和 AUC0-∞ 的 GMR(90% CI)值分别为 103.00%(100.94-105.11%)、101.90%(99.63-104.22%)和 102.99%(100.87-105.16%)。在空腹和进食状态下,两种制剂的主要药代动力学参数(Cmax、AUC0-72 和 AUC0-∞)的几何平均比(GMRs)和相应的 90% 置信区间(CIs)均在 80.00-125.00% 的范围内。结论 在空腹和进食状态下,评估了奥硝唑片剂参比制剂和试验制剂在中国健康人群中的生物等效性和耐受性。结果表明,两种制剂的生物等效性和耐受性总体良好;此外,食物和药物之间的相互作用可能会影响药物的药代动力学。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Case Report of JAK Inhibitors Therapy for Adult-Onset Still’s Disease with Persistent Pruritic Lesions Changes in Early-Phase Clinical Trials in China During 2013–2022: A Review Evaluation of Ornidazole Tablets Bioequivalence in Chinese Healthy Participants Under Fasted and Fed Conditions Using Pharmacokinetic Parameters Talaporfin Brentuximab Vedotin
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1