The distance from tree legumes in silvopastoral systems modifies the litter in grass-composed pastures

Amanda Maria Gallindo dos Santos, Jose Carlos Batista Dubeux, Mércia Virginia Ferreira dos Santos, Suellen Brandão de Miranda Costa, Diego de Lima Côelho, Erick Rodrigo da Silva Santos, Naligia Gomes de Miranda e Silva, Bárbara Marcélia Martins de Oliveira, Valéria Xavier de Oliveira Apolinário, Janerson José Coelho
{"title":"The distance from tree legumes in silvopastoral systems modifies the litter in grass-composed pastures","authors":"Amanda Maria Gallindo dos Santos, Jose Carlos Batista Dubeux, Mércia Virginia Ferreira dos Santos, Suellen Brandão de Miranda Costa, Diego de Lima Côelho, Erick Rodrigo da Silva Santos, Naligia Gomes de Miranda e Silva, Bárbara Marcélia Martins de Oliveira, Valéria Xavier de Oliveira Apolinário, Janerson José Coelho","doi":"10.1017/s0021859624000200","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The use of silvopastoral systems with tree legumes is a viable alternative to recover and develop pastures, as they add N to the system influencing pasture growth. This study hypothesized that the herbage and litter of signalgrass (<span>Urochloa decumbens</span> Stapf) is affected by legume trees in the pasture. Treatments were composed of (1) signalgrass + <span>Mimosa caesalpiniifolia</span> Benth.; (2) signalgrass + <span>Gliricidia sepium</span> Jacq.; and (3) signalgrass monoculture. The 3-year experiment followed a randomized complete block design with three replications. Tree legumes were planted in double rows (15 × 1 × 0.5 m), in 1 ha paddocks. Litter samples were taken in five distance points (0, 1.8, 3.7, 5.6 and 7.5 m) perpendicular to tree legume rows. Signalgrass was taller at longer distances from the trees (<span>P</span> &lt; 0.05). Signalgrass height differed between treatments, with taller signalgrass found in pastures mixed with <span>G. sepium</span> (15.6 cm) compared to <span>M. caesalpiniifolia</span> (9 cm) (<span>P</span> &lt; 0.05). Herbage N content decreased with increasing distance from tree rows (<span>P</span> &lt; 0.05). Litter N content followed a similar pattern, ranging from 23 g/kg under the trees to 12 g/kg at 7.5 m away from tree rows. Signalgrass did not grow under the tree crown (0–1.8 m), especially when intercropped with <span>M. caesalpiniifolia</span>. The findings of this study suggest that the type of legume trees used in the silvopastoral system has the potential to modify the pattern of grass growth and content of N in pasture litter.</p>","PeriodicalId":501199,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Agricultural Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Agricultural Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s0021859624000200","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The use of silvopastoral systems with tree legumes is a viable alternative to recover and develop pastures, as they add N to the system influencing pasture growth. This study hypothesized that the herbage and litter of signalgrass (Urochloa decumbens Stapf) is affected by legume trees in the pasture. Treatments were composed of (1) signalgrass + Mimosa caesalpiniifolia Benth.; (2) signalgrass + Gliricidia sepium Jacq.; and (3) signalgrass monoculture. The 3-year experiment followed a randomized complete block design with three replications. Tree legumes were planted in double rows (15 × 1 × 0.5 m), in 1 ha paddocks. Litter samples were taken in five distance points (0, 1.8, 3.7, 5.6 and 7.5 m) perpendicular to tree legume rows. Signalgrass was taller at longer distances from the trees (P < 0.05). Signalgrass height differed between treatments, with taller signalgrass found in pastures mixed with G. sepium (15.6 cm) compared to M. caesalpiniifolia (9 cm) (P < 0.05). Herbage N content decreased with increasing distance from tree rows (P < 0.05). Litter N content followed a similar pattern, ranging from 23 g/kg under the trees to 12 g/kg at 7.5 m away from tree rows. Signalgrass did not grow under the tree crown (0–1.8 m), especially when intercropped with M. caesalpiniifolia. The findings of this study suggest that the type of legume trees used in the silvopastoral system has the potential to modify the pattern of grass growth and content of N in pasture litter.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
林牧系统中与豆科植物的距离会改变草地上的枯草量
使用带有木本豆科植物的林牧系统是恢复和发展牧场的一个可行替代方案,因为木本豆科植物可为系统增加氮,影响牧草的生长。本研究假设信号草(Urochloa decumbens Stapf)的草本植物和枯草会受到牧场中豆科树木的影响。处理包括:(1)信号草 + Mimosa caesalpiniifolia Benth.;(2)信号草 + Gliricidia sepium Jacq.;(3)信号草单一种植。实验为期 3 年,采用随机完全区组设计,三次重复。在 1 公顷的围场中双行(15 × 1 × 0.5 米)种植木本豆科植物。在与豆科植物行垂直的五个距离点(0、1.8、3.7、5.6 和 7.5 米)采集草屑样本。距离树木较远的信号草较高 (P < 0.05)。不同处理的信号草高度不同,与 M. caesalpiniifolia(9 厘米)相比,与 G. sepium(15.6 厘米)混合的牧草中信号草更高(P < 0.05)。垃圾氮含量随着与树行距离的增加而减少(P <0.05)。垃圾中的氮含量也遵循类似的规律,从树下的 23 克/千克到距离树行 7.5 米处的 12 克/千克不等。信号草没有在树冠下(0-1.8 米)生长,尤其是与 M. caesalpiniifolia 间作时。这项研究的结果表明,在林牧系统中使用的豆科植物树的类型有可能改变草的生长模式和牧草枯落物中的氮含量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Energy supplementation of beef steers or inclusion of legumes in temperate pastures in crop-livestock integration area Using multivariate analysis to predict carcass characteristics of lambs in grazing and supplemented with different levels of non-protein nitrogen Direct and maternal genetic parameters for growth traits in Jersey crossbred cattle The effects of breed and genomic inbreeding on milk, fat and protein lactation yields and fertility traits in pasture-based dairy cows in Argentina Effect of using hydroxychloride as a copper source on performance, eggshell quality, tibia properties, mineral excretion, and antioxidant capacity of yolk in layer quails
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1