Personal values and career‐related preferences among young adults

IF 5 1区 心理学 Q1 Psychology Journal of Personality Pub Date : 2024-04-22 DOI:10.1111/jopy.12935
Yuliya Lipshits‐Braziler, Sharon Arieli, Ella Daniel
{"title":"Personal values and career‐related preferences among young adults","authors":"Yuliya Lipshits‐Braziler, Sharon Arieli, Ella Daniel","doi":"10.1111/jopy.12935","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ObjectiveThe present study investigated personal values underlying career‐related preferences among young adults deliberating on their career choice. As a fundamental component of one's identity, personal values can offer valuable insights into how individuals prioritize their career‐related preferences.MethodWe employed two complementary approaches: variable‐centered and person‐centered, using a sample of 636 young adults (69.5% women; <jats:italic>M</jats:italic><jats:sub>age</jats:sub> = 21.9, <jats:italic>SD</jats:italic> = 2.12).ResultsUsing a <jats:italic>variable‐centered approach</jats:italic>, we identified 14 value‐expressive career‐related preferences, demonstrating that individuals are less willing to compromise on these preferences than on non value‐expressive preferences. Using a <jats:italic>person‐centered approach</jats:italic>, we applied latent profile analysis to identify four groups of young adults with distinct value profiles: (1) <jats:italic>growth‐focus</jats:italic> (<jats:italic>n</jats:italic> = 212; 33.3%), (2) <jats:italic>protection‐focus</jats:italic> (<jats:italic>n</jats:italic> = 206; 32.4%), (3) <jats:italic>self‐focus</jats:italic> (<jats:italic>n</jats:italic> = 122; 19.2%), and (4) <jats:italic>social‐focus</jats:italic> (<jats:italic>n</jats:italic> = 96; 15.1%). Importantly, the four profiles varied in 18 of 31 career‐related preferences, revealing the composition of values underlying these career preferences. Fourteen of these preferences were identified as value‐expressive in a variable‐centered approach.ConclusionThe two complementary approaches employed in the present study introduce a fine‐grained understanding of the value‐expressiveness of career‐related preferences.","PeriodicalId":48421,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Personality","volume":"26 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Personality","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12935","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Psychology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ObjectiveThe present study investigated personal values underlying career‐related preferences among young adults deliberating on their career choice. As a fundamental component of one's identity, personal values can offer valuable insights into how individuals prioritize their career‐related preferences.MethodWe employed two complementary approaches: variable‐centered and person‐centered, using a sample of 636 young adults (69.5% women; Mage = 21.9, SD = 2.12).ResultsUsing a variable‐centered approach, we identified 14 value‐expressive career‐related preferences, demonstrating that individuals are less willing to compromise on these preferences than on non value‐expressive preferences. Using a person‐centered approach, we applied latent profile analysis to identify four groups of young adults with distinct value profiles: (1) growth‐focus (n = 212; 33.3%), (2) protection‐focus (n = 206; 32.4%), (3) self‐focus (n = 122; 19.2%), and (4) social‐focus (n = 96; 15.1%). Importantly, the four profiles varied in 18 of 31 career‐related preferences, revealing the composition of values underlying these career preferences. Fourteen of these preferences were identified as value‐expressive in a variable‐centered approach.ConclusionThe two complementary approaches employed in the present study introduce a fine‐grained understanding of the value‐expressiveness of career‐related preferences.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
年轻人的个人价值观和职业相关偏好
本研究调查了正在考虑职业选择的年轻成年人在职业相关偏好中蕴含的个人价值观。方法我们采用了两种互补的方法:以变量为中心的方法和以人为中心的方法,样本为 636 名青壮年(69.5% 为女性;年龄 = 21.9,SD = 2.12)。结果采用以变量为中心的方法,我们确定了 14 种与职业相关的价值表现偏好,表明与非价值表现偏好相比,个人更不愿意在这些偏好上妥协。通过以人为中心的方法,我们运用潜在特征分析确定了四组具有不同价值特征的年轻人:(1) 关注成长(n = 212;33.3%),(2) 关注保护(n = 206;32.4%),(3) 关注自我(n = 122;19.2%),(4) 关注社交(n = 96;15.1%)。重要的是,在 31 种与职业相关的偏好中,有 18 种偏好的四种特征各不相同,这揭示了这些职业偏好背后的价值观构成。结论 本研究中采用的两种互补方法对与职业相关的偏好的价值表现性有了细致的了解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Personality
Journal of Personality PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL-
CiteScore
9.60
自引率
6.00%
发文量
100
期刊介绍: Journal of Personality publishes scientific investigations in the field of personality. It focuses particularly on personality and behavior dynamics, personality development, and individual differences in the cognitive, affective, and interpersonal domains. The journal reflects and stimulates interest in the growth of new theoretical and methodological approaches in personality psychology.
期刊最新文献
Measures of Subclinical Psychopathy and Everyday Sadism are Still Redundant: A Conceptual Replication and Extension of Blötner and Mokros (2023). The (Un)Attractiveness of Dark Triad Personalities: Assessing Fictitious Characters for Short- and Long-Term Relationships. Understanding Parenting Stress in Adoptive Parents: A Longitudinal Multilevel Study of Parents' Self-Criticism, Child Negative Emotionality, and Child Age at Placement. Personality and Meat Consumption Among Romantic Partners in Daily Life Development of Self‐Reported Reward Responsiveness and Inhibitory Control and the Role of Clinical and Neural Predictors
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1