Rock and Roll, Desegregation Movements, and Racism in the Post–Civil Rights Era: An "Integrated Effort." by Beth Fowler (review)

Pub Date : 2024-04-22 DOI:10.1353/soh.2024.a925486
Brian Suttell
{"title":"Rock and Roll, Desegregation Movements, and Racism in the Post–Civil Rights Era: An \"Integrated Effort.\" by Beth Fowler (review)","authors":"Brian Suttell","doi":"10.1353/soh.2024.a925486","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<span><span>In lieu of</span> an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:</span>\n<p> <span>Reviewed by:</span> <ul> <li><!-- html_title --> <em>Rock and Roll, Desegregation Movements, and Racism in the Post–Civil Rights Era: An “Integrated Effort.”</em> by Beth Fowler <!-- /html_title --></li> <li> Brian Suttell </li> </ul> <em>Rock and Roll, Desegregation Movements, and Racism in the Post–Civil Rights Era: An “Integrated Effort.”</em> By Beth Fowler. (Lanham, Md., and other cities: Lexington Books, 2022. Pp. x, 362. Paper, $42.99, ISBN 978-1-7936-1387-5; cloth, $130.00, ISBN 978-1-7936-1385-1.) <p>Beth Fowler provides historical and social insights in <em>Rock and Roll, Desegregation Movements, and Racism in the Post–Civil Rights Era: An “Integrated Effort.”</em> The heart of her research is interviews from forty-five individuals, whose reflections on their experiences related to race and rock and roll illuminate both the subjects’ history and Fowler’s analysis. In assessing seemingly distinct yet interrelated topics, Fowler effectively delivers the historical context, and her skillful framing of the interviewees’ responses carries her subjects’ complexity.</p> <p>Fowler offers nuanced yet clear arguments, such as “the focus on individual achievement that was so crucial to integration strategies also urged many white supporters to embrace a ‘color-blind’ approach to race relations rather than recognizing the need for group-based solutions to structural problems” (p. 9). She demonstrates broad patterns in music and in desegregation, as well <strong>[End Page 459]</strong> as their interrelatedness, without overstating connections. She points out that crossover records (appealing to different styles) were hitting <em>Billboard</em> charts concurrently with civil rights developments such as the <em>Brown v. Board of Education</em> (1954) decision and the Montgomery, Alabama, bus boycott. Much of her analysis emphasizes the limits of the seeming racial progress of things such as white youth embracing music by Black musicians or the apparently decreasing discrimination in the music industry. “But this ‘integration’ of popular culture through crossover records,” she states, “would not ultimately lead to the fundamental investigation of structural white supremacy that deeper change would require” (p. 75).</p> <p>One strength of the book is its balance between explaining the impact of key musicians and using interviewee responses to reflect societal shifts. Fowler utilizes quotations from John Lennon and Mick Jagger to highlight the impact that R&amp;B had on them, but she then provides reflections from interviewees. She addresses the influence of Black musicians such as Little Richard, Fats Domino, and Chuck Berry whose sounds were often emulated or covered by white artists. Some of her most insightful analysis suggests how lyrics were affected by the context of the times, as in the Coasters’ “Charlie Brown” pondering, “Why’s everybody always picking on me?” (p. 182). Fowler argues that the song demonstrates a lonesome response to public humiliation, which could “speak . . . [to] Black teenagers who chose to integrate white high schools” (p. 182). Whether discussing frustrating or encouraging moments, Fowler captures the zeitgeist related to music and desegregation.</p> <p>In general, the chapters first convey introductory points related to both major topics, which are then addressed distinctly under subheadings, and later return to connections between music and desegregation. The organization is effective, allowing the author to provide nuance while addressing the interrelated history and significance. Historical interpretations by other scholars are woven in effectively. But instances in which there are multiple historiographical references within a paragraph might have been better if reduced to only one, which could still establish a base for her own arguments rooted in the impressive primary research. Overall, Fowler’s focus on the interviews and her insightful analysis illuminate a complex history that still resonates.</p> <p>Fowler makes clear the perils of viewing most racial problems as being solved by official desegregation in the mid-1960s. She quotes an interviewee who expressed hope that on the heels of the Black Lives Matter movement there will be a wave of insightful music. Reflecting on the man’s statement, Fowler asserts, “music may be able to affect or reflect people’s political views, he [the interviewee] implies, but that relationship is not quite as simple as many listeners would like to believe” (p. 313). The main contribution of <em>Rock and Roll, Desegregation Movements, and Racism in the Post–Civil Rights Era</em> rests in advancing the understanding not only of the relationship of rock and roll and desegregation, but also of how...</p> </p>","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/soh.2024.a925486","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:

Reviewed by:

  • Rock and Roll, Desegregation Movements, and Racism in the Post–Civil Rights Era: An “Integrated Effort.” by Beth Fowler
  • Brian Suttell
Rock and Roll, Desegregation Movements, and Racism in the Post–Civil Rights Era: An “Integrated Effort.” By Beth Fowler. (Lanham, Md., and other cities: Lexington Books, 2022. Pp. x, 362. Paper, $42.99, ISBN 978-1-7936-1387-5; cloth, $130.00, ISBN 978-1-7936-1385-1.)

Beth Fowler provides historical and social insights in Rock and Roll, Desegregation Movements, and Racism in the Post–Civil Rights Era: An “Integrated Effort.” The heart of her research is interviews from forty-five individuals, whose reflections on their experiences related to race and rock and roll illuminate both the subjects’ history and Fowler’s analysis. In assessing seemingly distinct yet interrelated topics, Fowler effectively delivers the historical context, and her skillful framing of the interviewees’ responses carries her subjects’ complexity.

Fowler offers nuanced yet clear arguments, such as “the focus on individual achievement that was so crucial to integration strategies also urged many white supporters to embrace a ‘color-blind’ approach to race relations rather than recognizing the need for group-based solutions to structural problems” (p. 9). She demonstrates broad patterns in music and in desegregation, as well [End Page 459] as their interrelatedness, without overstating connections. She points out that crossover records (appealing to different styles) were hitting Billboard charts concurrently with civil rights developments such as the Brown v. Board of Education (1954) decision and the Montgomery, Alabama, bus boycott. Much of her analysis emphasizes the limits of the seeming racial progress of things such as white youth embracing music by Black musicians or the apparently decreasing discrimination in the music industry. “But this ‘integration’ of popular culture through crossover records,” she states, “would not ultimately lead to the fundamental investigation of structural white supremacy that deeper change would require” (p. 75).

One strength of the book is its balance between explaining the impact of key musicians and using interviewee responses to reflect societal shifts. Fowler utilizes quotations from John Lennon and Mick Jagger to highlight the impact that R&B had on them, but she then provides reflections from interviewees. She addresses the influence of Black musicians such as Little Richard, Fats Domino, and Chuck Berry whose sounds were often emulated or covered by white artists. Some of her most insightful analysis suggests how lyrics were affected by the context of the times, as in the Coasters’ “Charlie Brown” pondering, “Why’s everybody always picking on me?” (p. 182). Fowler argues that the song demonstrates a lonesome response to public humiliation, which could “speak . . . [to] Black teenagers who chose to integrate white high schools” (p. 182). Whether discussing frustrating or encouraging moments, Fowler captures the zeitgeist related to music and desegregation.

In general, the chapters first convey introductory points related to both major topics, which are then addressed distinctly under subheadings, and later return to connections between music and desegregation. The organization is effective, allowing the author to provide nuance while addressing the interrelated history and significance. Historical interpretations by other scholars are woven in effectively. But instances in which there are multiple historiographical references within a paragraph might have been better if reduced to only one, which could still establish a base for her own arguments rooted in the impressive primary research. Overall, Fowler’s focus on the interviews and her insightful analysis illuminate a complex history that still resonates.

Fowler makes clear the perils of viewing most racial problems as being solved by official desegregation in the mid-1960s. She quotes an interviewee who expressed hope that on the heels of the Black Lives Matter movement there will be a wave of insightful music. Reflecting on the man’s statement, Fowler asserts, “music may be able to affect or reflect people’s political views, he [the interviewee] implies, but that relationship is not quite as simple as many listeners would like to believe” (p. 313). The main contribution of Rock and Roll, Desegregation Movements, and Racism in the Post–Civil Rights Era rests in advancing the understanding not only of the relationship of rock and roll and desegregation, but also of how...

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
后民权时代的摇滚乐、取消种族隔离运动和种族主义:贝丝-福勒(Beth Fowler)的 "综合努力"(评论
以下是内容的简要摘录,以代替摘要:评论者 后民权时代的摇滚乐、取消种族隔离运动和种族主义:贝丝-福勒(Beth Fowler)、布莱恩-苏泰尔(Brian Suttell)合著的《后民权时代的摇滚乐、取消种族隔离运动和种族主义》:综合努力"。作者:Beth Fowler。(马里兰州兰哈姆及其他城市:莱克星顿图书公司,2022 年。x, 362页。纸质版,42.99 美元,ISBN 978-1-7936-1387-5;布质版,130.00 美元,ISBN 978-1-7936-1385-1)。Beth Fowler 在《后民权时代的摇滚乐、取消种族隔离运动和种族主义》一书中提供了历史和社会见解:一项 "综合努力"。她的研究核心是对 45 个人的访谈,这些人对自己与种族和摇滚乐有关的经历的反思,既照亮了研究对象的历史,也照亮了 Fowler 的分析。在评估看似不同但又相互关联的主题时,福勒有效地介绍了历史背景,她对受访者回答的巧妙构思也体现了研究对象的复杂性。Fowler 提出的论点细致入微而又清晰明了,例如 "对个人成就的关注对融合战略至关重要,这也促使许多白人支持者采用'肤色盲'的方法来处理种族关系,而不是认识到需要以群体为基础来解决结构性问题"(第 9 页)。她展示了音乐和取消种族隔离的广泛模式,以及它们之间的相互联系,但没有夸大联系。她指出,在《布朗诉教育委员会案》(Brown v. Board of Education,1954 年)判决和阿拉巴马州蒙哥马利巴士抵制运动等民权运动发展的同时,跨界唱片(吸引不同风格的唱片)也登上了公告牌排行榜。她的大部分分析都强调了白人青年接受黑人音乐家的音乐或音乐行业歧视明显减少等看似种族进步的局限性。她说,"但这种通过跨界唱片实现的流行文化'融合',""最终不会导致对结构性白人至上主义的根本性调查,而这需要更深层次的变革"(第 75 页)。该书的一个优点是在解释主要音乐家的影响和利用受访者的回应来反映社会变革之间取得了平衡。Fowler 引用了约翰-列侬和米克-贾格尔的话来强调 R&B 对他们的影响,但她随后又提供了受访者的反思。她谈到了小理查德(Little Richard)、多米诺(Fats Domino)和查克-贝瑞(Chuck Berry)等黑人音乐家的影响,这些音乐家的声音经常被白人艺术家模仿或翻唱。她的一些最有见地的分析表明歌词如何受到时代背景的影响,如 Coasters 乐队的 "Charlie Brown "在思考:"为什么每个人总是欺负我?(p. 182).Fowler 认为,这首歌展示了一种对公众羞辱的孤独回应,它可以 "诉说......[给]那些选择在公众面前羞辱自己的黑人青少年"。[黑人青少年选择融入白人高中"(第 182 页)。无论是讨论令人沮丧还是令人鼓舞的时刻,福勒都捕捉到了与音乐和取消种族隔离有关的时代精神。总的来说,各章首先传达了与这两个主要议题相关的介绍性观点,然后在小标题下对其进行了不同的论述,之后又回到了音乐与取消种族隔离之间的联系。这种组织方式非常有效,使作者在论述相互关联的历史和意义的同时,还能提供细微差别。其他学者对历史的解读也有效地穿插其中。但是,如果在一个段落中引用多处史料,最好只引用一处,这样仍然可以为她自己的论点建立一个扎根于令人印象深刻的原始研究的基础。总之,福勒对访谈的关注和她富有洞察力的分析揭示了一段复杂的历史,至今仍能引起共鸣。Fowler 明确指出,将大多数种族问题视为 20 世纪 60 年代中期官方取消种族隔离就能解决的做法是危险的。她引用了一位受访者的话,他表示希望在 "黑人生命至上 "运动之后,会出现一波有洞察力的音乐浪潮。在反思此人的言论时,Fowler 断言:"他(受访者)暗示,音乐或许能够影响或反映人们的政治观点,但这种关系并不像许多听众愿意相信的那样简单"(第 313 页)。后民权时代的摇滚乐、取消种族隔离运动和种族主义》的主要贡献在于不仅加深了人们对摇滚乐和取消种族隔离之间关系的理解,而且加深了人们对摇滚乐和取消种族隔离之间关系的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1