Administration and effects of beta blockers and oxandrolone in severely burned adults: a post hoc analysis of the RE-ENERGIZE trial

IF 6.3 1区 医学 Q1 DERMATOLOGY Burns & Trauma Pub Date : 2024-04-22 DOI:10.1093/burnst/tkad063
Gabriel Hundeshagen, Elisabeth Blears, Viktoria Mertin, Andrew G Day, Alen Palackic, Christian Tapking, Valentin Haug, Ulrich Kneser, Björn Bliesener, Adriana C Panayi, Ariel Aballay, Francois Depret, Christian Stoppe, Daren K Heyland
{"title":"Administration and effects of beta blockers and oxandrolone in severely burned adults: a post hoc analysis of the RE-ENERGIZE trial","authors":"Gabriel Hundeshagen, Elisabeth Blears, Viktoria Mertin, Andrew G Day, Alen Palackic, Christian Tapking, Valentin Haug, Ulrich Kneser, Björn Bliesener, Adriana C Panayi, Ariel Aballay, Francois Depret, Christian Stoppe, Daren K Heyland","doi":"10.1093/burnst/tkad063","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Prospective randomized trials in severely burned children have shown the positive effects of oxandrolone (OX), beta blockers (BB) and a combination of the two (BBOX) on hypermetabolism, catabolism and hyperinflammation short- and long-term post-burn. Although data on severely burned adults are lacking in comparison, BB, OX and BBOX appear to be commonly employed in this patient population. In this study, we perform a secondary analysis of an international prospective randomized trial dataset to provide descriptive evidence regarding the current utilization patterns and potential treatment effects of OX, BB and BBOX. Methods The RE-ENERGIZE (RandomizEd Trial of ENtERal Glutamine to minimIZE Thermal Injury, NCT00985205) trial included 1200 adult patients with severe burns. We stratified patients according to their receipt of OX, BB, BBOX or none of these drugs (None) during acute hospitalization. Descriptive statistics describe the details of drug therapy and unadjusted analyses identify predisposing factors for drug use per group. Association between OX, BB and BBOX and clinical outcomes such as time to discharge alive and 6-month mortality were modeled using adjusted multivariable Cox regressions. Results More than half of all patients in the trial received either OX (n = 138), BB (n = 293) or BBOX (n = 282), as opposed to None (n = 487, 40.6%). Per study site and geographical region, use of OX, BB and BBOX was highly variable. Predisposing factors for the use of OX, BB and BBOX included larger total body surface area (TBSA) burned, higher acute physiology and chronic health evaluation (APACHE) II scores on admission and younger patient age. After adjustment for multiple covariates, the use of OX was associated with a longer time to discharge alive [hazard ratio (HR) 0.62, confidence interval (CI) (0.47–0.82) per 100% increase, p = 0.001]. A higher proportion of days on BB was associated with lower in-hospital-mortality (HR: 0.5, CI 0.28–0.87, p = 0.015) and 6-month mortality (HR: 0.44, CI 0.24–0.82, p = 0.01). Conclusions The use of OX, BB and BBOX is common within the adult burn patient population, with its use varying considerably across sites worldwide. Our findings found mixed associations between outcomes and the use of BB and OX in adult burn patients, with lower acute and 6-month-mortality with BB and longer times to discharge with OX. Further research into these pharmacological modulators of the pathophysiological response to severe burn injury is indicated.","PeriodicalId":9553,"journal":{"name":"Burns & Trauma","volume":"48 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Burns & Trauma","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/burnst/tkad063","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background Prospective randomized trials in severely burned children have shown the positive effects of oxandrolone (OX), beta blockers (BB) and a combination of the two (BBOX) on hypermetabolism, catabolism and hyperinflammation short- and long-term post-burn. Although data on severely burned adults are lacking in comparison, BB, OX and BBOX appear to be commonly employed in this patient population. In this study, we perform a secondary analysis of an international prospective randomized trial dataset to provide descriptive evidence regarding the current utilization patterns and potential treatment effects of OX, BB and BBOX. Methods The RE-ENERGIZE (RandomizEd Trial of ENtERal Glutamine to minimIZE Thermal Injury, NCT00985205) trial included 1200 adult patients with severe burns. We stratified patients according to their receipt of OX, BB, BBOX or none of these drugs (None) during acute hospitalization. Descriptive statistics describe the details of drug therapy and unadjusted analyses identify predisposing factors for drug use per group. Association between OX, BB and BBOX and clinical outcomes such as time to discharge alive and 6-month mortality were modeled using adjusted multivariable Cox regressions. Results More than half of all patients in the trial received either OX (n = 138), BB (n = 293) or BBOX (n = 282), as opposed to None (n = 487, 40.6%). Per study site and geographical region, use of OX, BB and BBOX was highly variable. Predisposing factors for the use of OX, BB and BBOX included larger total body surface area (TBSA) burned, higher acute physiology and chronic health evaluation (APACHE) II scores on admission and younger patient age. After adjustment for multiple covariates, the use of OX was associated with a longer time to discharge alive [hazard ratio (HR) 0.62, confidence interval (CI) (0.47–0.82) per 100% increase, p = 0.001]. A higher proportion of days on BB was associated with lower in-hospital-mortality (HR: 0.5, CI 0.28–0.87, p = 0.015) and 6-month mortality (HR: 0.44, CI 0.24–0.82, p = 0.01). Conclusions The use of OX, BB and BBOX is common within the adult burn patient population, with its use varying considerably across sites worldwide. Our findings found mixed associations between outcomes and the use of BB and OX in adult burn patients, with lower acute and 6-month-mortality with BB and longer times to discharge with OX. Further research into these pharmacological modulators of the pathophysiological response to severe burn injury is indicated.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
严重烧伤成人服用β受体阻滞剂和奥昔诺龙的效果:RE-ENERGIZE 试验的事后分析
背景 在严重烧伤儿童中进行的前瞻性随机试验表明,奥昔洛酮(OX)、β受体阻滞剂(BB)以及这两种药物的复方制剂(BBOX)对烧伤后短期和长期的高代谢、分解代谢和高炎症反应有积极的作用。虽然缺乏关于严重烧伤成人的对比数据,但 BB、OX 和 BBOX 似乎是这类患者的常用药物。在本研究中,我们对一个国际前瞻性随机试验数据集进行了二次分析,以提供有关目前使用 OX、BB 和 BBOX 的模式和潜在治疗效果的描述性证据。方法 RE-ENERGIZE(RandomizEd Trial of ENtERal Glutamine to minimIZE Thermal Injury,NCT00985205)试验纳入了 1200 名成年重度烧伤患者。我们根据患者在急性住院期间服用 OX、BB、BBOX 或未服用上述药物(无)的情况对患者进行了分层。描述性统计描述了药物治疗的详细情况,未调整分析确定了各组药物使用的易感因素。使用调整后的多变量 Cox 回归法模拟了 OX、BB 和 BBOX 与临床结果(如出院存活时间和 6 个月死亡率)之间的关系。结果 在所有参加试验的患者中,超过一半的患者接受了 OX(138 人)、BB(293 人)或 BBOX(282 人)治疗,而无患者接受治疗(487 人,40.6%)。每个研究地点和地理区域使用 OX、BB 和 BBOX 的情况差异很大。使用OX、BB和BBOX的诱发因素包括烧伤的总体表面积(TBSA)较大、入院时急性生理学和慢性健康评估(APACHE)II评分较高以及患者年龄较小。在对多个协变量进行调整后,使用 OX 与更长的出院存活时间相关[每增加 100%,危险比 (HR) 为 0.62,置信区间 (CI) 为 (0.47-0.82),p = 0.001]。BB天数比例越高,院内死亡率(HR:0.5,CI 0.28-0.87,p = 0.015)和6个月死亡率(HR:0.44,CI 0.24-0.82,p = 0.01)越低。结论 在成年烧伤患者中,使用 OX、BB 和 BBOX 是很常见的,但全球各地的使用情况差异很大。我们的研究结果发现,成人烧伤患者的预后与使用 BB 和 OX 的关系不一,使用 BB 的急性期死亡率和 6 个月死亡率较低,而使用 OX 的患者出院时间较长。我们建议进一步研究这些药物对严重烧伤病理生理反应的调节作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Burns & Trauma
Burns & Trauma 医学-皮肤病学
CiteScore
8.40
自引率
9.40%
发文量
186
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊介绍: The first open access journal in the field of burns and trauma injury in the Asia-Pacific region, Burns & Trauma publishes the latest developments in basic, clinical and translational research in the field. With a special focus on prevention, clinical treatment and basic research, the journal welcomes submissions in various aspects of biomaterials, tissue engineering, stem cells, critical care, immunobiology, skin transplantation, and the prevention and regeneration of burns and trauma injuries. With an expert Editorial Board and a team of dedicated scientific editors, the journal enjoys a large readership and is supported by Southwest Hospital, which covers authors'' article processing charges.
期刊最新文献
SportSync health: revolutionizing patient care in sports medicine through integrated follow-up technologies. Dexmedetomidine regulates exosomal miR-29b-3p from macrophages and alleviates septic myocardial injury by promoting autophagy in cardiomyocytes via targeting glycogen synthase kinase 3β. Polylactic acid-based dressing with oxygen generation and enzyme-like activity for accelerating both light-driven biofilm elimination and wound healing Single-cell sequencing technology in skin wound healing Consensus on the prevention and repair of titanium mesh exposed wound after cranioplasty (2024 edition).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1