Psychological wellbeing in parents of children with Down syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis

IF 13.7 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Clinical Psychology Review Pub Date : 2024-04-06 DOI:10.1016/j.cpr.2024.102426
T.L. Rutter , R.P. Hastings , C.A. Murray , N. Enoch , S. Johnson , C. Stinton
{"title":"Psychological wellbeing in parents of children with Down syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"T.L. Rutter ,&nbsp;R.P. Hastings ,&nbsp;C.A. Murray ,&nbsp;N. Enoch ,&nbsp;S. Johnson ,&nbsp;C. Stinton","doi":"10.1016/j.cpr.2024.102426","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>We report a review examining the psychological wellbeing of parents of children with Down syndrome (DS) relative to that of parents of typically developing (TD) children. A systematic search identified 57 relevant studies, which were synthesised meta-analytically. Relative to their counterparts with TD children, mothers and fathers of children with DS reported higher levels of parenting stress (mothers: <em>g</em> <em>=</em> 0.57, 95% CI [0.33, 0.81]; fathers: <em>g</em> <em>=</em> 0.40, [0.24, 0.56]), depressive symptoms (mothers: <em>g</em> <em>=</em> 0.42, [0.23, 0.61]; fathers: <em>g</em> <em>=</em> 0.25, [0.02, 0.48]) and psychological distress (mothers: <em>g</em> <em>=</em> 0.45, [0.30, 0.60]; fathers: <em>g</em> <em>=</em> 0.63, [0.26, 0.99]). Small effects were found for anxiety for mothers (<em>g</em> <em>=</em> 0.16, [0.03, 0.29]), with no differences for fathers (<em>g</em> <em>=</em> 0.03, [−0.25, 0.32]). No group differences were found for positive impact of parenting (mothers: <em>g</em> <em>=</em> −0.09, [−0.25, 0.07]; fathers: <em>g</em> <em>=</em> −0.04, [−0.30, 0.22]), while evidence concerning other positive wellbeing outcomes was limited. No significant moderating effects of child age range, country income level, or group differences in parental education level were identified, but limited subgroup analyses were possible. Raising a child with DS may be associated with elevated stress, depressive symptoms, and psychological distress for mothers and fathers. However, levels of parenting reward appear equivalent to those experienced by parents raising TD children.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48458,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Psychology Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":13.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0272735824000473/pdfft?md5=ece56f372b7d8f3c858fe66774e8ca7d&pid=1-s2.0-S0272735824000473-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Psychology Review","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0272735824000473","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We report a review examining the psychological wellbeing of parents of children with Down syndrome (DS) relative to that of parents of typically developing (TD) children. A systematic search identified 57 relevant studies, which were synthesised meta-analytically. Relative to their counterparts with TD children, mothers and fathers of children with DS reported higher levels of parenting stress (mothers: g = 0.57, 95% CI [0.33, 0.81]; fathers: g = 0.40, [0.24, 0.56]), depressive symptoms (mothers: g = 0.42, [0.23, 0.61]; fathers: g = 0.25, [0.02, 0.48]) and psychological distress (mothers: g = 0.45, [0.30, 0.60]; fathers: g = 0.63, [0.26, 0.99]). Small effects were found for anxiety for mothers (g = 0.16, [0.03, 0.29]), with no differences for fathers (g = 0.03, [−0.25, 0.32]). No group differences were found for positive impact of parenting (mothers: g = −0.09, [−0.25, 0.07]; fathers: g = −0.04, [−0.30, 0.22]), while evidence concerning other positive wellbeing outcomes was limited. No significant moderating effects of child age range, country income level, or group differences in parental education level were identified, but limited subgroup analyses were possible. Raising a child with DS may be associated with elevated stress, depressive symptoms, and psychological distress for mothers and fathers. However, levels of parenting reward appear equivalent to those experienced by parents raising TD children.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
唐氏综合征患儿父母的心理健康:系统回顾和荟萃分析
我们对唐氏综合症(DS)患儿父母的心理健康与发育正常(TD)患儿父母的心理健康进行了回顾性研究。通过系统检索,我们发现了 57 项相关研究,并对这些研究进行了元分析综合。与 TD 儿童的父母相比,唐氏综合症儿童的母亲和父亲报告的养育压力水平更高(母亲:g = 0.57,95% CI [0.33,0.81];父亲:g = 0.40,[0.24,0.56])、抑郁症状(母亲:g = 0.42,[0.23,0.61];父亲:g = 0.25,[0.02,0.48])和心理困扰(母亲:g = 0.45,[0.30,0.60];父亲:g = 0.63,[0.26,0.99])。焦虑对母亲的影响较小(g = 0.16,[0.03,0.29]),对父亲则无差异(g = 0.03,[-0.25,0.32])。在养育子女的积极影响方面没有发现群体差异(母亲:g = -0.09,[-0.25,0.07];父亲:g = -0.04,[-0.30,0.22]),而有关其他积极幸福结果的证据有限。没有发现儿童年龄范围、国家收入水平或父母教育水平的群体差异有明显的调节作用,但可以进行有限的亚组分析。抚养 DS 患儿可能会给母亲和父亲带来更大的压力、抑郁症状和心理困扰。然而,养育子女的回报水平似乎与养育TD儿童的父母的回报水平相当。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Psychology Review
Clinical Psychology Review PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
23.10
自引率
1.60%
发文量
65
期刊介绍: Clinical Psychology Review serves as a platform for substantial reviews addressing pertinent topics in clinical psychology. Encompassing a spectrum of issues, from psychopathology to behavior therapy, cognition to cognitive therapies, behavioral medicine to community mental health, assessment, and child development, the journal seeks cutting-edge papers that significantly contribute to advancing the science and/or practice of clinical psychology. While maintaining a primary focus on topics directly related to clinical psychology, the journal occasionally features reviews on psychophysiology, learning therapy, experimental psychopathology, and social psychology, provided they demonstrate a clear connection to research or practice in clinical psychology. Integrative literature reviews and summaries of innovative ongoing clinical research programs find a place within its pages. However, reports on individual research studies and theoretical treatises or clinical guides lacking an empirical base are deemed inappropriate for publication.
期刊最新文献
Factors related to help-seeking and service utilization for professional mental healthcare among young people: An umbrella review Positive health outcomes of mindfulness-based interventions for cancer patients and survivors: A systematic review and meta-analysis Sleep and paranoia: A systematic review and meta-analysis Avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder: Systematic review and meta-analysis demonstrating the impact of study quality on prevalence rates Gender nonconformity and common mental health problems: A meta-analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1