Healthcare on the Go: A Comparative Analysis Profiling the Travel Nurse Workforce in the United States

IF 4.2 4区 医学 Q1 NURSING Journal of Nursing Regulation Pub Date : 2024-04-01 DOI:10.1016/S2155-8256(24)00032-2
Elizabeth H. Zhong PhD, Richard Smiley MA, MS, Charlie O’Hara PhD, Brendan Martin PhD
{"title":"Healthcare on the Go: A Comparative Analysis Profiling the Travel Nurse Workforce in the United States","authors":"Elizabeth H. Zhong PhD,&nbsp;Richard Smiley MA, MS,&nbsp;Charlie O’Hara PhD,&nbsp;Brendan Martin PhD","doi":"10.1016/S2155-8256(24)00032-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Travel nurses play a pivotal role in filling acute staffing gaps, thereby adding resilience to the country’s healthcare service. Never has the value of travel nurses been clearer than it was during the COVID-19 pandemic. However, a comprehensive national assessment of travel nurses’ demographic and professional profiles has not yet been conducted, nor is there any detailed accounting of the specific challenges these nurses encountered.</p></div><div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>To gain a better understanding of the demographic and practice characteristics of travel nurses.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This is a cross-sectional descriptive analysis of 2,006 travel nurses (1,239 registered nurses [RNs] and 767 licensed practical nurses/licensed vocational nurses [simply referred to as licensed practical nurses, or LPNs, throughout the abstract]) who participated in the 2022 National Nursing Workforce Survey. Information on their demographic characteristics, practice experiences during the pandemic, and future practice plans was collected and evaluated. The comparison group was made up of 41,729 nontravel nurses (22,803 RNs and 18,926 LPNs) who participated in the same survey.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Travel nurses tended to be younger, exhibit greater gender diversity, and report better pay than nontravel nurses. A significantly higher proportion of travel nurses held multistate licenses (64% versus 34% for RNs, and 55% versus 31% for LPNs). The odds of travel nurses using their multistate license in practice were about 5 times greater than they were for nontravel nurses (RNs: <em>OR</em> = 5.93; 95% CI: 5.02–7.00, <em>p</em> &lt; .01; LPNs: <em>OR</em> = 5.09; 95% CI: 4.11–6.29, <em>p</em> &lt; .01). Travel nurses reported higher work stress and burnout than nontravel nurses: 64% versus 47% of RNs and 53% versus 48% of LPNs reported being emotionally drained either a few times per week or every day. A significantly higher proportion of travel nurses younger than 60 years planned to leave nursing in the next 5 years compared to nontravel nurses (33% versus 17% for RNs, <em>OR</em> = 2.27, 95% CI: 2.00–2.59, <em>p</em> &lt; .01, and 21% versus 17% for LPNs, <em>OR</em> = 1.28, 95% CI: 1.05–1.56, <em>p</em> &lt; .05).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Despite comparatively higher pay and younger age, travel nurses experienced elevated work stress and were more likely than nontravel nurses to consider leaving their nursing career early. Healthcare regulators, travel nurse agencies, and nursing employers should be aware of the unique demographics and practice characteristics of travel nurses to develop more effective retention strategies to maintain a healthy and stable nursing workforce.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":46153,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nursing Regulation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nursing Regulation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2155825624000322","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Travel nurses play a pivotal role in filling acute staffing gaps, thereby adding resilience to the country’s healthcare service. Never has the value of travel nurses been clearer than it was during the COVID-19 pandemic. However, a comprehensive national assessment of travel nurses’ demographic and professional profiles has not yet been conducted, nor is there any detailed accounting of the specific challenges these nurses encountered.

Purpose

To gain a better understanding of the demographic and practice characteristics of travel nurses.

Methods

This is a cross-sectional descriptive analysis of 2,006 travel nurses (1,239 registered nurses [RNs] and 767 licensed practical nurses/licensed vocational nurses [simply referred to as licensed practical nurses, or LPNs, throughout the abstract]) who participated in the 2022 National Nursing Workforce Survey. Information on their demographic characteristics, practice experiences during the pandemic, and future practice plans was collected and evaluated. The comparison group was made up of 41,729 nontravel nurses (22,803 RNs and 18,926 LPNs) who participated in the same survey.

Results

Travel nurses tended to be younger, exhibit greater gender diversity, and report better pay than nontravel nurses. A significantly higher proportion of travel nurses held multistate licenses (64% versus 34% for RNs, and 55% versus 31% for LPNs). The odds of travel nurses using their multistate license in practice were about 5 times greater than they were for nontravel nurses (RNs: OR = 5.93; 95% CI: 5.02–7.00, p < .01; LPNs: OR = 5.09; 95% CI: 4.11–6.29, p < .01). Travel nurses reported higher work stress and burnout than nontravel nurses: 64% versus 47% of RNs and 53% versus 48% of LPNs reported being emotionally drained either a few times per week or every day. A significantly higher proportion of travel nurses younger than 60 years planned to leave nursing in the next 5 years compared to nontravel nurses (33% versus 17% for RNs, OR = 2.27, 95% CI: 2.00–2.59, p < .01, and 21% versus 17% for LPNs, OR = 1.28, 95% CI: 1.05–1.56, p < .05).

Conclusion

Despite comparatively higher pay and younger age, travel nurses experienced elevated work stress and were more likely than nontravel nurses to consider leaving their nursing career early. Healthcare regulators, travel nurse agencies, and nursing employers should be aware of the unique demographics and practice characteristics of travel nurses to develop more effective retention strategies to maintain a healthy and stable nursing workforce.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
旅行中的医疗保健:美国旅行护士队伍的比较分析剖析
背景旅行护士在填补急诊人员缺口方面发挥着关键作用,从而增强了国家医疗保健服务的应变能力。在 COVID-19 大流行期间,旅行护士的价值从未像现在这样明显。然而,目前尚未对旅行护士的人口统计学和专业概况进行全面的全国性评估,也没有详细说明这些护士所遇到的具体挑战。方法这是对参加 2022 年全国护理劳动力调查的 2006 名旅行护士(1239 名注册护士和 767 名执业护士/执照职业护士[在摘要中简称为执业护士或 LPN])进行的横断面描述性分析。我们收集并评估了他们的人口统计学特征、大流行期间的实践经验以及未来的实践计划等信息。对比组由 41,729 名参与同一调查的非旅行护士(22,803 名注册护士和 18,926 名 LPN)组成。持有多州执照的旅行护士比例明显更高(护士为 64% 对 34%,LPN 为 55% 对 31%)。旅行护士在执业过程中使用多州执照的几率大约是非旅行护士的 5 倍(RNs:OR = 5.93; 95% CI: 5.02-7.00, p < .01; LPNs:OR = 5.09; 95% CI: 4.11-6.29, p <.01)。旅行护士的工作压力和职业倦怠高于非旅行护士:64%的护士(RNs)和53%的护士(LPNs)报告每周或每天都有几次情绪低落,而非旅行护士的这一比例分别为47%和53%。与非旅行护士相比,60 岁以下的旅行护士计划在未来 5 年内离开护理岗位的比例明显更高(护士为 33%,而非旅行护士为 17%,OR = 2.27,95% CI:2.00-2.59,p <.01;LPN 为 21%,而非旅行护士为 17%,OR = 1.28,95% CI:1.00,p <.01)。28, 95% CI: 1.05-1.56, p <.05)。结论尽管旅行护士的薪酬相对较高,年龄也较小,但他们的工作压力很大,而且比非旅行护士更有可能考虑提前离开护理行业。医疗监管机构、旅行护士机构和护士雇主应了解旅行护士独特的人口统计学和实践特征,以制定更有效的留住人才策略,维持一支健康稳定的护士队伍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
12.50%
发文量
50
审稿时长
54 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Nursing Regulation (JNR), the official journal of the National Council of State Boards of Nursing (NCSBN®), is a quarterly, peer-reviewed, academic and professional journal. It publishes scholarly articles that advance the science of nursing regulation, promote the mission and vision of NCSBN, and enhance communication and collaboration among nurse regulators, educators, practitioners, and the scientific community. The journal supports evidence-based regulation, addresses issues related to patient safety, and highlights current nursing regulatory issues, programs, and projects in both the United States and the international community. In publishing JNR, NCSBN''s goal is to develop and share knowledge related to nursing and other healthcare regulation across continents and to promote a greater awareness of regulatory issues among all nurses.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Table of Contents Enhancing Integration of Internationally Educated Health Professionals in the Healthcare Workforce: Implications for Regulators The Licensed Practical/Vocational Nurse Workforce: Examining Nurses’ Practice Patterns, Workloads, and Burnout by Race and Ethnicity The Under 35 Nursing Workforce in 2022: Overworked, Under Supported, and Burned Out
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1