Validity and reliability of the modified four square step test in total HIP arthroplasty

IF 1.2 Q3 REHABILITATION JOURNAL OF BODYWORK AND MOVEMENT THERAPIES Pub Date : 2024-04-16 DOI:10.1016/j.jbmt.2024.04.028
Emel Tasvuran Horata , Fatma Eken , Murat Yesil , Ozal Ozcan
{"title":"Validity and reliability of the modified four square step test in total HIP arthroplasty","authors":"Emel Tasvuran Horata ,&nbsp;Fatma Eken ,&nbsp;Murat Yesil ,&nbsp;Ozal Ozcan","doi":"10.1016/j.jbmt.2024.04.028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>The Modified Four Square Step Test (mFSST) evaluates dynamic stabilization by using tape instead of canes to prevent people from tripping over obstacles and losing their balance. There was no study investigating reliability and validity in primary total hip arthroplasty (THA). This study aimed to evaluate the test-retest reliability, concurrent validity, and minimum detectable change in the mFSST for individuals with primary THA.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>This study was cross-sectional in design. A total of 29 individuals aged 56.86 ± 10.14 years participated. The study used the test-retest method to determine the reliability of the mFSST and concurrent validity. The Timed Up and Go Test (TUGT) and Berg Balance Scale (BBS) were applied for concurrent validity. The minimum detectable change (MDC95) and the standard error measurement (SEM) were calculated.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The mFSST showed excellent intra-rater reliability (ICC = 0.925). The SEM and MDC95 of the mFSST were 1.56 and 4.32. The test had a strong correlation with TUGT (r = 0.881) and BBS (r = −0.718) (p &lt; 0.001).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The mFSST is a valid and reliable assessment tool that can be used for individuals with primary THA.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51431,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF BODYWORK AND MOVEMENT THERAPIES","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF BODYWORK AND MOVEMENT THERAPIES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S136085922400216X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

The Modified Four Square Step Test (mFSST) evaluates dynamic stabilization by using tape instead of canes to prevent people from tripping over obstacles and losing their balance. There was no study investigating reliability and validity in primary total hip arthroplasty (THA). This study aimed to evaluate the test-retest reliability, concurrent validity, and minimum detectable change in the mFSST for individuals with primary THA.

Method

This study was cross-sectional in design. A total of 29 individuals aged 56.86 ± 10.14 years participated. The study used the test-retest method to determine the reliability of the mFSST and concurrent validity. The Timed Up and Go Test (TUGT) and Berg Balance Scale (BBS) were applied for concurrent validity. The minimum detectable change (MDC95) and the standard error measurement (SEM) were calculated.

Results

The mFSST showed excellent intra-rater reliability (ICC = 0.925). The SEM and MDC95 of the mFSST were 1.56 and 4.32. The test had a strong correlation with TUGT (r = 0.881) and BBS (r = −0.718) (p < 0.001).

Conclusion

The mFSST is a valid and reliable assessment tool that can be used for individuals with primary THA.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
全髋关节置换术中改良四方格台阶试验的有效性和可靠性
导言改良四方步测试(mFSST)通过使用胶带代替手杖来评估动态稳定性,以防止人们被障碍物绊倒而失去平衡。目前还没有针对全髋关节置换术(THA)的信度和效度的研究。本研究旨在评估原发性全髋关节置换术患者的 mFSST 的重复测试可靠性、并发有效性和最小可检测到的变化。共有 29 名年龄为(56.86 ± 10.14)岁的患者参与了研究。研究采用重复测试法来确定 mFSST 的可靠性和并发有效性。同时效度采用了定时起立行走测试(TUGT)和伯格平衡量表(BBS)。结果 mFSST 的评分者内部信度极佳(ICC = 0.925)。mFSST 的 SEM 和 MDC95 分别为 1.56 和 4.32。该测试与 TUGT(r = 0.881)和 BBS(r = -0.718)有很强的相关性(p < 0.001)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
133
审稿时长
321 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Bodywork and Movement Therapies brings you the latest therapeutic techniques and current professional debate. Publishing highly illustrated articles on a wide range of subjects this journal is immediately relevant to everyday clinical practice in private, community and primary health care settings. Techiques featured include: • Physical Therapy • Osteopathy • Chiropractic • Massage Therapy • Structural Integration • Feldenkrais • Yoga Therapy • Dance • Physiotherapy • Pilates • Alexander Technique • Shiatsu and Tuina
期刊最新文献
Evaluation of craniocervical posture after myofascial pain treatment in adults with bruxism: A randomized clinical trial How effective is proprioception exercise on pain, grip force, dexterity and proprioception of elbow joint in patients with tennis elbow? A randomized controlled trial Effectiveness of a cervical treatment in wind-instrument musicians with temporomandibular dysfunction: A randomized clinical trial Preventive effect of foam rolling on muscle soreness after exercise: A systematic review and meta-analysis Effectiveness of the scapula mobilization technique on the neural mechanosensitivity of the upper limb neural test 1 in individuals with mechanical cervicalgia. A randomized controlled trial
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1