Notes from the Underground: Seeking the top personality correlates of self‐referencing

IF 5 1区 心理学 Q1 Psychology Journal of Personality Pub Date : 2024-04-23 DOI:10.1111/jopy.12936
Nicholas S. Holtzman, Jeffrey J. Klibert, A. Brianna Dixon, Hannah L. Dorough, M. Brent Donnellan
{"title":"Notes from the Underground: Seeking the top personality correlates of self‐referencing","authors":"Nicholas S. Holtzman, Jeffrey J. Klibert, A. Brianna Dixon, Hannah L. Dorough, M. Brent Donnellan","doi":"10.1111/jopy.12936","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ObjectiveSelf‐focused language use has been frequently assumed to reflect narcissism; however, research indicates that the association between first‐person singular pronouns (i.e., “I‐talk”) and grandiose narcissism is negligible.MethodTo extend this literature, we progressively identify vulnerable narcissism and rumination as positive correlates of I‐talk in five studies (valid <jats:italic>N</jats:italic>s = 211, 475, 1253, 289, 1113).ResultsThe first study revealed positive correlates of I‐talk suggestive of vulnerable narcissism. The second study showed more directly that vulnerable narcissism was a positive correlate but that this association was attributable to shared variance with neuroticism. The third study, a preregistered effort, replicated and extended the results of the second study. The fourth and fifth studies focused on rumination in a preregistered manner.ConclusionsAll the studies point to a clear distinction: While grandiose narcissism is negligibly related to I‐talk, vulnerable narcissism is positively related to I‐talk; moreover, rumination is a robust predictor of I‐talk. A research synthesis revealed the following constructs significantly capture I‐talk: depression (<jats:italic>r</jats:italic> = 0.10), neuroticism (<jats:italic>r</jats:italic> = 0.15), rumination (<jats:italic>r</jats:italic> = 0.14), and vulnerable narcissism (<jats:italic>r</jats:italic> = 0.12). The association between I‐talk and neuroticism was partially mediated by rumination, providing a testable candidate mechanism for neuroticism interventions.","PeriodicalId":48421,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Personality","volume":"25 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Personality","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12936","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Psychology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ObjectiveSelf‐focused language use has been frequently assumed to reflect narcissism; however, research indicates that the association between first‐person singular pronouns (i.e., “I‐talk”) and grandiose narcissism is negligible.MethodTo extend this literature, we progressively identify vulnerable narcissism and rumination as positive correlates of I‐talk in five studies (valid Ns = 211, 475, 1253, 289, 1113).ResultsThe first study revealed positive correlates of I‐talk suggestive of vulnerable narcissism. The second study showed more directly that vulnerable narcissism was a positive correlate but that this association was attributable to shared variance with neuroticism. The third study, a preregistered effort, replicated and extended the results of the second study. The fourth and fifth studies focused on rumination in a preregistered manner.ConclusionsAll the studies point to a clear distinction: While grandiose narcissism is negligibly related to I‐talk, vulnerable narcissism is positively related to I‐talk; moreover, rumination is a robust predictor of I‐talk. A research synthesis revealed the following constructs significantly capture I‐talk: depression (r = 0.10), neuroticism (r = 0.15), rumination (r = 0.14), and vulnerable narcissism (r = 0.12). The association between I‐talk and neuroticism was partially mediated by rumination, providing a testable candidate mechanism for neuroticism interventions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
地下笔记寻找自我参照的顶级人格相关因素
目标以自我为中心的语言使用经常被认为反映了自恋;然而,研究表明,第一人称单数代词(即 "我说")与自恋之间的关联微乎其微、方法为了扩展这些文献,我们在五项研究(有效样本数 = 211、475、1253、289、1113)中逐步将脆弱自恋和反刍确定为 "我说 "的正相关因素。结果第一项研究显示,"我说 "的正相关因素暗示了脆弱自恋。第二项研究更直接地表明,脆弱自恋是一种正相关,但这种关联可归因于神经质的共同变异。第三项研究是一项预先登记的工作,它重复并扩展了第二项研究的结果。第四项和第五项研究以预先登记的方式关注反刍:所有研究都指出了一个明显的区别:傲慢自恋与 "我说 "的关系微乎其微,而脆弱自恋与 "我说 "呈正相关;此外,反刍是 "我说 "的一个强有力的预测因素。研究综述显示,以下结构显著捕捉了我谈现象:抑郁(r = 0.10)、神经质(r = 0.15)、反刍(r = 0.14)和脆弱自恋(r = 0.12)。I-talk与神经质之间的关联部分是由反刍中介的,这为神经质干预提供了一个可测试的候选机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Personality
Journal of Personality PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL-
CiteScore
9.60
自引率
6.00%
发文量
100
期刊介绍: Journal of Personality publishes scientific investigations in the field of personality. It focuses particularly on personality and behavior dynamics, personality development, and individual differences in the cognitive, affective, and interpersonal domains. The journal reflects and stimulates interest in the growth of new theoretical and methodological approaches in personality psychology.
期刊最新文献
The (Un)Attractiveness of Dark Triad Personalities: Assessing Fictitious Characters for Short- and Long-Term Relationships. Understanding Parenting Stress in Adoptive Parents: A Longitudinal Multilevel Study of Parents' Self-Criticism, Child Negative Emotionality, and Child Age at Placement. Personality and Meat Consumption Among Romantic Partners in Daily Life Development of Self‐Reported Reward Responsiveness and Inhibitory Control and the Role of Clinical and Neural Predictors Negative Emotion (dys)regulation Predicts Distorted Time Perception: Preliminary Experimental Evidence and Implications for Psychopathology
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1