Second-line FOLFOX chemotherapy for patients with advanced biliary tract cancers pretreated with cisplatin/gemcitabine: a systematic review and meta-analysis

A. Digklia , D. Arnold , I.A. Voutsadakis
{"title":"Second-line FOLFOX chemotherapy for patients with advanced biliary tract cancers pretreated with cisplatin/gemcitabine: a systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"A. Digklia ,&nbsp;D. Arnold ,&nbsp;I.A. Voutsadakis","doi":"10.1016/j.esmogo.2024.100055","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Biliary cancers are aggressive carcinomas frequently diagnosed at an advanced stage. Palliative combination systemic therapy provides survival benefits in the first-line setting of advanced and metastatic disease. FOLFOX chemotherapy is one of the few options in the second-line therapy.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>The medical literature was searched through the Medline/PubMed and Embase databases to acquire clinical reports or trials of FOLFOX treatment for biliary cancers in the second-line metastatic setting after first-line cisplatin/gemcitabine chemotherapy. Eligible prospective and retrospective studies were reviewed and included in a meta-analysis with overall response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) as outcomes of interest.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Six clinical studies were eligible and included in the meta-analysis. The ORR with second-line FOLFOX chemotherapy in this population was 10.42% [95% confidence interval (CI) 4.55% to 16.3%]. Two-fifths of the patients had stable disease for a DCR of 50.65% (95% CI 38.4% to 62.9%). The median PFS was 3.03 months (95% CI 1.38-4.09 months) and the median OS was 6.43 months (95% CI 5.43-7.43 months). The main grade 3/4 adverse effects observed in &gt;10% of patients were neutropenia (21.2%) and asthenia/fatigue (10.3%).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The meta-analysis observed a moderate efficacy of the FOLFOX combination in this setting. These results may be used as a benchmark to compare gains obtained in this setting with novel treatments, including recently introduced targeted therapies in appropriately selected patients.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100490,"journal":{"name":"ESMO Gastrointestinal Oncology","volume":"4 ","pages":"Article 100055"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949819824000165/pdfft?md5=c8d52ffa2793b1b75e9b284b1ac2b435&pid=1-s2.0-S2949819824000165-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ESMO Gastrointestinal Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949819824000165","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Biliary cancers are aggressive carcinomas frequently diagnosed at an advanced stage. Palliative combination systemic therapy provides survival benefits in the first-line setting of advanced and metastatic disease. FOLFOX chemotherapy is one of the few options in the second-line therapy.

Materials and methods

The medical literature was searched through the Medline/PubMed and Embase databases to acquire clinical reports or trials of FOLFOX treatment for biliary cancers in the second-line metastatic setting after first-line cisplatin/gemcitabine chemotherapy. Eligible prospective and retrospective studies were reviewed and included in a meta-analysis with overall response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) as outcomes of interest.

Results

Six clinical studies were eligible and included in the meta-analysis. The ORR with second-line FOLFOX chemotherapy in this population was 10.42% [95% confidence interval (CI) 4.55% to 16.3%]. Two-fifths of the patients had stable disease for a DCR of 50.65% (95% CI 38.4% to 62.9%). The median PFS was 3.03 months (95% CI 1.38-4.09 months) and the median OS was 6.43 months (95% CI 5.43-7.43 months). The main grade 3/4 adverse effects observed in >10% of patients were neutropenia (21.2%) and asthenia/fatigue (10.3%).

Conclusions

The meta-analysis observed a moderate efficacy of the FOLFOX combination in this setting. These results may be used as a benchmark to compare gains obtained in this setting with novel treatments, including recently introduced targeted therapies in appropriately selected patients.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用顺铂/吉西他滨预处理的晚期胆道癌患者的二线FOLFOX化疗:系统综述和荟萃分析
背景胆道癌是一种侵袭性癌症,经常在晚期诊断出来。在晚期和转移性疾病的一线治疗中,姑息性联合系统治疗可提高生存率。材料与方法通过Medline/PubMed和Embase数据库检索医学文献,以获得在一线顺铂/吉西他滨化疗后二线转移性胆道癌FOLFOX治疗的临床报告或试验。对符合条件的前瞻性和回顾性研究进行了审查,并以总反应率(ORR)、疾病控制率(DCR)、无进展生存期(PFS)和总生存期(OS)作为研究结果纳入荟萃分析。在这些人群中,二线FOLFOX化疗的ORR为10.42%[95%置信区间(CI)为4.55%至16.3%]。五分之二的患者病情稳定,DCR 为 50.65%(95% 置信区间为 38.4% 至 62.9%)。中位PFS为3.03个月(95% CI为1.38-4.09个月),中位OS为6.43个月(95% CI为5.43-7.43个月)。在>10%的患者中观察到的3/4级不良反应主要是中性粒细胞减少(21.2%)和气喘/疲劳(10.3%)。荟萃分析观察到 FOLFOX 联合疗法在这种情况下具有中等疗效。这些结果可作为基准,用于比较在这种情况下与新型疗法(包括最近在适当选择的患者中引入的靶向疗法)的疗效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The outcomes of elderly patients with localized squamous-cell carcinoma of the anal canal treated with chemoradiation Clinical outcomes of carbon-ion radiotherapy for residual or recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma after transarterial chemoembolization Clinicopathologic correlates of claudin 18.2 expression in esophagogastric cancer at multiple expression levels Corrigendum to “Feasibility of stereotactic radiotherapy with pembrolizumab in patients with deficient mismatch repair/microsatellite unstable metastatic colorectal cancer” A review of established and new developments in local therapies for liver cancer
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1