首页 > 最新文献

ESMO Gastrointestinal Oncology最新文献

英文 中文
Growth differentiation factor-15 (GDF-15) in localized pancreatic adenocarcinoma treated with multiagent chemotherapy: a biomarker analysis from the NEOLAP trial (AIO-PAK-0113) 生长分化因子-15 (GDF-15)在多药化疗治疗的局部胰腺腺癌中的作用:NEOLAP试验(aio - pak0113)的生物标志物分析
Pub Date : 2026-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-12-15 DOI: 10.1016/j.esmogo.2025.100274
B. Kimmel , S.T. Löhnert , F. Wedekink , M. Günther , S. Ormanns , I. Hartlapp , J. Siveke , G. Siegler , S. Boeck , H. Algül , U. Martens , F. Kullmann , T. Ettrich , S. Held , F. Anger , C.-T. Germer , V. Heinemann , J. Wischhusen , V. Kunzmann

Background

The prognostic and predictive role of growth differentiation factor-15 (GDF-15) in localized, non-metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) has not yet been explored.

Patients and methods

During the prospective randomized phase II NEOLAP-1 (AIO-PAK-0113) trial for patients with therapy-naive locally advanced (borderline or unresectable) PDAC, blood (n = 131) and tumor tissue samples (n = 39) were collected. Using paired baseline and post-induction chemotherapy (ICT) samples, circulating GDF-15 (cGDF-15) levels were quantified by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, and local GDF-15 tumor expression (tGDF-15) was assessed by immunohistochemistry.

Results

Lower baseline cGDF-15 levels (≤0.8 ng/ml) were significantly associated with increased median overall survival [21.92 (95% CI 19.73-24.16) versus 12.68 [95% confidence interval (CI) 10.56-14.81] months, P < 0.001, and significantly higher secondary R0 resection rates (36.5% versus 13.9%, P = 0.0051). In contrast to CA 19-9, cGDF-15 levels significantly increased after ICT [median 1.0 ng/ml [interquartile range (IQR) 0.62-1.5 ng/ml] at baseline versus median 2.37 ng/ml (IQR 1.32-4.43 ng/ml) at week 16], especially after treatment using platinum-based agents. In initial tumor specimens, GDF-15 expression was rare and predominantly confined to tumor cells. tGDF-15 correlated with high cGDF-15 levels at baseline [median 1.8 ng/ml (1.13-2.34 ng/ml) in positive tumor specimens, versus 0.76 ng/ml (0.55-1.17 ng/ml) in negative tumor specimens; P = 0.0087]. Similarly to cGDF-15, tGDF-15 expression increased after ICT (from 10% to 41% positive tumor specimens).

Conclusions

High cGDF-15 levels at baseline are a negative prognostic and predictive biomarker in localized, non-metastatic PDAC. Considering that GDF-15 is further up-regulated by neoadjuvant multiagent chemotherapy, our data, together with recent findings on clinical effects of GDF-15, provide a strong rationale for upfront therapeutic GDF-15 blockade in localized PDAC.
生长分化因子-15 (GDF-15)在局部非转移性胰腺导管腺癌(PDAC)中的预后和预测作用尚未探讨。患者和方法在前瞻性随机II期NEOLAP-1 (AIO-PAK-0113)试验中,收集了未接受治疗的局部晚期(交界性或不可切除)PDAC患者的血液(n = 131)和肿瘤组织样本(n = 39)。使用配对基线和诱导化疗后(ICT)样本,通过酶联免疫吸附法定量循环GDF-15 (cGDF-15)水平,并通过免疫组织化学评估局部GDF-15肿瘤表达(tGDF-15)。结果较低的基线cGDF-15水平(≤0.8 ng/ml)与中位总生存期的增加显著相关[21.92 (95% CI 19.73-24.16)对12.68[95%可信区间(CI) 10.56-14.81]个月,P < 0.001],并与继发R0切除率的增加显著相关(36.5%对13.9%,P = 0.0051)。与CA 19-9相比,ICT后cGDF-15水平显著升高[基线时中位数为1.0 ng/ml[四分位数范围(IQR) 0.62-1.5 ng/ml],而第16周时中位数为2.37 ng/ml (IQR为1.32-4.43 ng/ml)],特别是在使用铂类药物治疗后。在初始肿瘤标本中,GDF-15的表达很少,并且主要局限于肿瘤细胞。tGDF-15与基线时高cGDF-15水平相关[阳性肿瘤标本中位数为1.8 ng/ml (1.13-2.34 ng/ml),阴性肿瘤标本中位数为0.76 ng/ml (0.55-1.17 ng/ml);P = 0.0087]。与cGDF-15类似,ICT后tGDF-15的表达增加(从10%到41%的肿瘤标本阳性)。结论基线时高cGDF-15水平是局部非转移性PDAC的阴性预后和预测性生物标志物。考虑到GDF-15在新辅助多药化疗中进一步上调,我们的数据以及最近关于GDF-15临床效果的研究结果,为局部PDAC的前期治疗性阻断GDF-15提供了强有力的理论依据。
{"title":"Growth differentiation factor-15 (GDF-15) in localized pancreatic adenocarcinoma treated with multiagent chemotherapy: a biomarker analysis from the NEOLAP trial (AIO-PAK-0113)","authors":"B. Kimmel ,&nbsp;S.T. Löhnert ,&nbsp;F. Wedekink ,&nbsp;M. Günther ,&nbsp;S. Ormanns ,&nbsp;I. Hartlapp ,&nbsp;J. Siveke ,&nbsp;G. Siegler ,&nbsp;S. Boeck ,&nbsp;H. Algül ,&nbsp;U. Martens ,&nbsp;F. Kullmann ,&nbsp;T. Ettrich ,&nbsp;S. Held ,&nbsp;F. Anger ,&nbsp;C.-T. Germer ,&nbsp;V. Heinemann ,&nbsp;J. Wischhusen ,&nbsp;V. Kunzmann","doi":"10.1016/j.esmogo.2025.100274","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.esmogo.2025.100274","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The prognostic and predictive role of growth differentiation factor-15 (GDF-15) in localized, non-metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) has not yet been explored.</div></div><div><h3>Patients and methods</h3><div>During the prospective randomized phase II NEOLAP-1 (AIO-PAK-0113) trial for patients with therapy-naive locally advanced (borderline or unresectable) PDAC, blood (<em>n</em> = 131) and tumor tissue samples (<em>n</em> = 39) were collected. Using paired baseline and post-induction chemotherapy (ICT) samples, circulating GDF-15 (cGDF-15) levels were quantified by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, and local GDF-15 tumor expression (tGDF-15) was assessed by immunohistochemistry.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Lower baseline cGDF-15 levels (≤0.8 ng/ml) were significantly associated with increased median overall survival [21.92 (95% CI 19.73-24.16) versus 12.68 [95% confidence interval (CI) 10.56-14.81] months, <em>P</em> &lt; 0.001, and significantly higher secondary R0 resection rates (36.5% versus 13.9%, <em>P</em> = 0.0051). In contrast to CA 19-9, cGDF-15 levels significantly increased after ICT [median 1.0 ng/ml [interquartile range (IQR) 0.62-1.5 ng/ml] at baseline versus median 2.37 ng/ml (IQR 1.32-4.43 ng/ml) at week 16], especially after treatment using platinum-based agents. In initial tumor specimens, GDF-15 expression was rare and predominantly confined to tumor cells. tGDF-15 correlated with high cGDF-15 levels at baseline [median 1.8 ng/ml (1.13-2.34 ng/ml) in positive tumor specimens, versus 0.76 ng/ml (0.55-1.17 ng/ml) in negative tumor specimens; <em>P</em> = 0.0087]. Similarly to cGDF-15, tGDF-15 expression increased after ICT (from 10% to 41% positive tumor specimens).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>High cGDF-15 levels at baseline are a negative prognostic and predictive biomarker in localized, non-metastatic PDAC. Considering that GDF-15 is further up-regulated by neoadjuvant multiagent chemotherapy, our data, together with recent findings on clinical effects of GDF-15, provide a strong rationale for upfront therapeutic GDF-15 blockade in localized PDAC.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100490,"journal":{"name":"ESMO Gastrointestinal Oncology","volume":"11 ","pages":"Article 100274"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145791900","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Impact of diabetes mellitus on treatment efficacy in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer: the Italian, multicenter, observational PANCAKE study 糖尿病对晚期胰腺癌患者治疗疗效的影响:意大利多中心观察性PANCAKE研究
Pub Date : 2026-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-12-15 DOI: 10.1016/j.esmogo.2025.100276
P. Andena , G. Tine , F. Nichetti , A. Pretta , L. Bartalini , S. Ljevar , A. Michelotti , L. Salvatore , M. Prisciandaro , A. Franza , G. Grelli , P. Ziranu , M. Bensi , V. Mazzaferro , J. Coppa , C. Sciortino , G. Zapelloni , C. Pircher , S.K. Garattini , C. Vivaldi , M. Niger

Background

Diabetes mellitus (DM) is a known risk factor for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Preclinical evidence suggests higher glucose levels may enhance chemotherapy injury to PDAC cells. Clinical evidence of DM’s impact in patients with PDAC receiving palliative treatment remains conflicting, however.

Materials and methods

PANCAKE, an Italian multicenter observational study, assessed the impact of DM and blood glucose levels on progression-free survival during first-line treatment and overall survival (OS) in patients with advanced PDAC.

Results

Among 663 patients with available baseline and on-treatment glycemic values, DM was confirmed in 193 patients (29.1%). Pre-existing DM was associated with a modest but significant OS benefit [median OS 11.6 versus 10.3 months, adjusted hazard ratio (HR) 0.82, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.67-0.99; P = 0.036]. This benefit was significantly associated with the chemotherapy regimen: it was observed only in patients treated with first-line gemcitabine–nab-paclitaxel, but not with FOLFIRINOX. A longitudinal, Bayesian joint modelling approach accounting for the concomitant use of glucose-lowering medications confirmed a statistically significant, but clinically modest prognostic effect of glycemic trends, as a 10 mg/dl-point increase from baseline blood glucose values resulted associated with a 4% reduction in the risk of death (HR for OS 0.9967, 95% CI 0.9939-0.9995).

Conclusions

DM and higher blood glucose levels show a statistically significant, though clinically modest, impact on the OS of patients affected by advanced PDAC, which may be differential according to the chemotherapy regimen. This evidence lays the foundations to guide future studies on pharmacological and dietary approaches targeting tumor metabolism in this setting.
背景:糖尿病(DM)是胰腺导管腺癌(PDAC)的已知危险因素。临床前证据表明,较高的葡萄糖水平可能会增加化疗对PDAC细胞的损伤。然而,糖尿病对接受姑息治疗的PDAC患者的影响的临床证据仍然存在冲突。意大利一项多中心观察性研究spancake评估了糖尿病和血糖水平对晚期PDAC患者一线治疗期间无进展生存期和总生存期(OS)的影响。结果在663例基线和治疗时血糖值可用的患者中,有193例(29.1%)确诊为糖尿病。既往存在糖尿病与中度但显著的生存获益相关[中位生存期11.6 vs 10.3个月,调整风险比(HR) 0.82, 95%可信区间(CI) 0.67-0.99;P = 0.036]。这一益处与化疗方案显著相关:仅在一线吉西他滨- nab-紫杉醇治疗的患者中观察到,而在FOLFIRINOX治疗的患者中没有观察到。考虑到同时使用降糖药物的纵向贝叶斯联合建模方法证实了血糖趋势具有统计学意义,但临床适度的预后影响,因为从基线血糖值增加10 mg/dl点导致死亡风险降低4%(风险比为0.9967,95% CI为0.9939-0.9995)。结论sdm和高血糖水平对晚期PDAC患者OS的影响具有统计学意义,但临床表现不明显,且可能因化疗方案不同而有所差异。这一证据为指导未来针对这种情况下肿瘤代谢的药理学和饮食方法的研究奠定了基础。
{"title":"Impact of diabetes mellitus on treatment efficacy in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer: the Italian, multicenter, observational PANCAKE study","authors":"P. Andena ,&nbsp;G. Tine ,&nbsp;F. Nichetti ,&nbsp;A. Pretta ,&nbsp;L. Bartalini ,&nbsp;S. Ljevar ,&nbsp;A. Michelotti ,&nbsp;L. Salvatore ,&nbsp;M. Prisciandaro ,&nbsp;A. Franza ,&nbsp;G. Grelli ,&nbsp;P. Ziranu ,&nbsp;M. Bensi ,&nbsp;V. Mazzaferro ,&nbsp;J. Coppa ,&nbsp;C. Sciortino ,&nbsp;G. Zapelloni ,&nbsp;C. Pircher ,&nbsp;S.K. Garattini ,&nbsp;C. Vivaldi ,&nbsp;M. Niger","doi":"10.1016/j.esmogo.2025.100276","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.esmogo.2025.100276","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Diabetes mellitus (DM) is a known risk factor for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Preclinical evidence suggests higher glucose levels may enhance chemotherapy injury to PDAC cells. Clinical evidence of DM’s impact in patients with PDAC receiving palliative treatment remains conflicting, however.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><div>PANCAKE, an Italian multicenter observational study, assessed the impact of DM and blood glucose levels on progression-free survival during first-line treatment and overall survival (OS) in patients with advanced PDAC.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Among 663 patients with available baseline and on-treatment glycemic values, DM was confirmed in 193 patients (29.1%). Pre-existing DM was associated with a modest but significant OS benefit [median OS 11.6 versus 10.3 months, adjusted hazard ratio (HR) 0.82, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.67-0.99; <em>P</em> = 0.036]. This benefit was significantly associated with the chemotherapy regimen: it was observed only in patients treated with first-line gemcitabine–nab-paclitaxel, but not with FOLFIRINOX. A longitudinal, Bayesian joint modelling approach accounting for the concomitant use of glucose-lowering medications confirmed a statistically significant, but clinically modest prognostic effect of glycemic trends, as a 10 mg/dl-point increase from baseline blood glucose values resulted associated with a 4% reduction in the risk of death (HR for OS 0.9967, 95% CI 0.9939-0.9995).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>DM and higher blood glucose levels show a statistically significant, though clinically modest, impact on the OS of patients affected by advanced PDAC, which may be differential according to the chemotherapy regimen. This evidence lays the foundations to guide future studies on pharmacological and dietary approaches targeting tumor metabolism in this setting.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100490,"journal":{"name":"ESMO Gastrointestinal Oncology","volume":"11 ","pages":"Article 100276"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145791901","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
DESTINY-Gastric05 phase III trial of first-line trastuzumab deruxtecan, chemotherapy, and pembrolizumab in HER2-positive gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer DESTINY-Gastric05 III期临床试验,一线曲妥珠单抗、德鲁德替康、化疗和派姆单抗治疗her2阳性胃癌或胃食管结癌
Pub Date : 2026-03-01 Epub Date: 2026-01-20 DOI: 10.1016/j.esmogo.2025.100294
Y.Y. Janjigian , E. Smyth , L. Shen , J. Lee , P.M. Hoff , S. Lonardi , D. Barrios , K. Kobayashi , Y. Okuda , T. Kamio , K. Shitara

Background

Gastric or gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) cancers are usually diagnosed at advanced stages with poor prognoses and 5-year survival rates. Standard-of-care first-line treatment of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive locally advanced or metastatic disease is chemotherapy and trastuzumab, plus pembrolizumab for programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1)-positive [combined positive score (CPS) ≥1] tumors. Trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) 6.4 mg/kg monotherapy is approved as second-line treatment for patients with HER2-positive gastric or GEJ cancer. DESTINY-Gastric03 (NCT04379596) showed that first-line T-DXd 5.4 mg/kg plus chemotherapy with or without pembrolizumab in the advanced setting had manageable safety and promising efficacy in HER2-positive gastric or GEJ cancer.

Aim

To investigate a first-line T-DXd plus platinum-free chemotherapy with pembrolizumab treatment approach for patients with HER2-positive gastric or GEJ cancer.

Trial design

DESTINY-Gastric05 (NCT06731478) is a global, multicenter, open-label, randomized, phase III trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of first-line T-DXd 5.4 mg/kg plus 5-fluorouracil or capecitabine and pembrolizumab versus platinum-based chemotherapy with trastuzumab and pembrolizumab in patients with unresectable, locally advanced or metastatic, centrally confirmed HER2-positive (immunohistochemistry 3+ or immunohistochemistry 2+/in situ hybridization positive) gastric or GEJ cancer with a PD-L1 CPS ≥1. An exploratory cohort is to evaluate T-DXd plus 5-fluorouracil or capecitabine in patients with PD-L1 CPS <1.
背景:胃或胃食管交界处(GEJ)癌通常在晚期诊断,预后差,5年生存率低。人类表皮生长因子受体2 (HER2)阳性的局部晚期或转移性疾病的标准护理一线治疗是化疗和曲妥珠单抗加派姆单抗治疗程序性死亡配体1 (PD-L1)阳性[联合阳性评分(CPS)≥1]的肿瘤。Trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) 6.4 mg/kg单药疗法被批准作为her2阳性胃癌或GEJ癌患者的二线治疗。DESTINY-Gastric03 (NCT04379596)显示,在晚期治疗中,一线T-DXd 5.4 mg/kg加化疗加或不加派姆单抗治疗her2阳性胃癌或GEJ癌具有可控的安全性和良好的疗效。目的探讨一线T-DXd +无铂化疗联合派姆单抗治疗her2阳性胃癌或GEJ癌的方法。宿命- gastric05 (NCT06731478)是一项全球性、多中心、开放标签、随机III期试验,旨在评估一线T-DXd 5.4 mg/kg加5-氟尿嘧啶或卡培他滨和派姆单抗与曲妥珠单抗和派姆单抗联合铂基化疗在不可切除、局部晚期或转移性、中心证实her2阳性(免疫组织化学3+或免疫组织化学2+/原位杂交阳性)胃癌或胃癌,PD-L1 CPS≥1。一项探索性队列研究旨在评估T-DXd联合5-氟尿嘧啶或卡培他滨对PD-L1 CPS患者的治疗效果。
{"title":"DESTINY-Gastric05 phase III trial of first-line trastuzumab deruxtecan, chemotherapy, and pembrolizumab in HER2-positive gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer","authors":"Y.Y. Janjigian ,&nbsp;E. Smyth ,&nbsp;L. Shen ,&nbsp;J. Lee ,&nbsp;P.M. Hoff ,&nbsp;S. Lonardi ,&nbsp;D. Barrios ,&nbsp;K. Kobayashi ,&nbsp;Y. Okuda ,&nbsp;T. Kamio ,&nbsp;K. Shitara","doi":"10.1016/j.esmogo.2025.100294","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.esmogo.2025.100294","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Gastric or gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) cancers are usually diagnosed at advanced stages with poor prognoses and 5-year survival rates. Standard-of-care first-line treatment of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive locally advanced or metastatic disease is chemotherapy and trastuzumab, plus pembrolizumab for programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1)-positive [combined positive score (CPS) ≥1] tumors. Trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) 6.4 mg/kg monotherapy is approved as second-line treatment for patients with HER2-positive gastric or GEJ cancer. DESTINY-Gastric03 (NCT04379596) showed that first-line T-DXd 5.4 mg/kg plus chemotherapy with or without pembrolizumab in the advanced setting had manageable safety and promising efficacy in HER2-positive gastric or GEJ cancer.</div></div><div><h3>Aim</h3><div>To investigate a first-line T-DXd plus platinum-free chemotherapy with pembrolizumab treatment approach for patients with HER2-positive gastric or GEJ cancer.</div></div><div><h3>Trial design</h3><div>DESTINY-Gastric05 (NCT06731478) is a global, multicenter, open-label, randomized, phase III trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of first-line T-DXd 5.4 mg/kg plus 5-fluorouracil or capecitabine and pembrolizumab versus platinum-based chemotherapy with trastuzumab and pembrolizumab in patients with unresectable, locally advanced or metastatic, centrally confirmed HER2-positive (immunohistochemistry 3+ or immunohistochemistry 2+/<em>in situ</em> hybridization positive) gastric or GEJ cancer with a PD-L1 CPS ≥1. An exploratory cohort is to evaluate T-DXd plus 5-fluorouracil or capecitabine in patients with PD-L1 CPS &lt;1.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100490,"journal":{"name":"ESMO Gastrointestinal Oncology","volume":"11 ","pages":"Article 100294"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146038192","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Regorafenib use in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: analyses of subgroups of special interest in the observational REFINE study 瑞非尼在不可切除肝细胞癌患者中的应用:观察性REFINE研究中特别关注的亚组分析
Pub Date : 2026-03-01 Epub Date: 2026-01-22 DOI: 10.1016/j.esmogo.2025.100292
Y.J. Kim , P. Merle , R.S. Finn , H.-J. Klümpen , H.Y. Lim , M. Ikeda , A. Granito , G. Masi , R. Gerolami , M. Pinter , S. Babajanyan , P. Twumasi-Ankrah , M. Ghadessi , K. Ozgurdal , S. Qin

Background

The findings of the prospective, real-world REFINE trial supported the safety and efficacy of regorafenib reported in the phase III RESORCE study, in a broader population of patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). This post hoc analysis evaluated patient subgroups based on liver function, liver cancer stage, and prior treatment.

Patients and methods

Patients were analyzed by subgroups based on liver function [Child–Pugh (CP)–B/B7], prior treatment [prior orthotopic liver transplant (pOLT), transarterial chemoembolization (TACE)/transarterial radioembolization (TARE)], and Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) stage. The primary objective was to evaluate the safety of regorafenib. Secondary objectives included effectiveness endpoints of overall survival (OS) and duration of treatment. All analyses were descriptive with no adjustment for confounders.

Results

A total of 1005 patients were evaluable (overall population). In patients with CP–B (n = 123) compared with the overall population, the incidence of grade ≥3 (28% versus 27%) and serious drug-related treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) was similar (11% versus 9%), whereas TEAEs leading to permanent discontinuation of regorafenib were more common (28% versus 16%). In patients with prior TACE (n = 584), the incidence of TEAEs was generally similar to patients without prior TACE (n = 421) and the overall population (92%, 91%, and 92%, respectively). Median OS was 12.3-19.3 months across all subgroups except CP–B/B7 (6.4/6.7 months).

Conclusions

This subgroup analysis of REFINE provides further evidence on the safety and effectiveness of regorafenib demonstrated in RESORCE, in underrepresented subgroups (CP–B, BCLC stage B/C, pOLT) and in those previously treated with TACE/TARE.
前瞻性、现实世界的REFINE试验结果支持reorafenib在更广泛的不可切除肝细胞癌(HCC)患者人群中的安全性和有效性。这项事后分析评估了基于肝功能、肝癌分期和既往治疗的患者亚组。患者和方法根据肝功能[Child-Pugh (CP) -B /B7]、既往治疗[既往原位肝移植(pOLT)、经动脉化疗栓塞(TACE)/经动脉放射栓塞(TARE)]和巴塞罗那临床肝癌(BCLC)分期进行亚组分析。主要目的是评估瑞非尼的安全性。次要目标包括总生存期(OS)和治疗时间的有效性终点。所有的分析都是描述性的,没有对混杂因素进行调整。结果1005例患者(总体)可评估。在CP-B患者(n = 123)中,与总体人群相比,≥3级(28%对27%)和严重药物相关治疗不良事件(teae)的发生率相似(11%对9%),而导致瑞非尼永久停药的teae更为常见(28%对16%)。在有TACE病史的患者(n = 584)中,teae的发生率与没有TACE病史的患者(n = 421)和总体人群(分别为92%、91%和92%)大致相似。除CP-B /B7(6.4/6.7个月)外,所有亚组的中位OS为12.3-19.3个月。REFINE的亚组分析进一步证明了reorafenib在resource、代表性不足的亚组(CP-B、BCLC B/C期、pOLT)和先前接受过TACE/TARE治疗的患者中的安全性和有效性。
{"title":"Regorafenib use in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: analyses of subgroups of special interest in the observational REFINE study","authors":"Y.J. Kim ,&nbsp;P. Merle ,&nbsp;R.S. Finn ,&nbsp;H.-J. Klümpen ,&nbsp;H.Y. Lim ,&nbsp;M. Ikeda ,&nbsp;A. Granito ,&nbsp;G. Masi ,&nbsp;R. Gerolami ,&nbsp;M. Pinter ,&nbsp;S. Babajanyan ,&nbsp;P. Twumasi-Ankrah ,&nbsp;M. Ghadessi ,&nbsp;K. Ozgurdal ,&nbsp;S. Qin","doi":"10.1016/j.esmogo.2025.100292","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.esmogo.2025.100292","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The findings of the prospective, real-world REFINE trial supported the safety and efficacy of regorafenib reported in the phase III RESORCE study, in a broader population of patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). This <em>post hoc</em> analysis evaluated patient subgroups based on liver function, liver cancer stage, and prior treatment.</div></div><div><h3>Patients and methods</h3><div>Patients were analyzed by subgroups based on liver function [Child–Pugh (CP)–B/B7], prior treatment [prior orthotopic liver transplant (pOLT), transarterial chemoembolization (TACE)/transarterial radioembolization (TARE)], and Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) stage. The primary objective was to evaluate the safety of regorafenib. Secondary objectives included effectiveness endpoints of overall survival (OS) and duration of treatment. All analyses were descriptive with no adjustment for confounders.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 1005 patients were evaluable (overall population). In patients with CP–B (<em>n</em> = 123) compared with the overall population, the incidence of grade ≥3 (28% versus 27%) and serious drug-related treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) was similar (11% versus 9%), whereas TEAEs leading to permanent discontinuation of regorafenib were more common (28% versus 16%). In patients with prior TACE (<em>n</em> = 584), the incidence of TEAEs was generally similar to patients without prior TACE (<em>n</em> = 421) and the overall population (92%, 91%, and 92%, respectively). Median OS was 12.3-19.3 months across all subgroups except CP–B/B7 (6.4/6.7 months).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>This subgroup analysis of REFINE provides further evidence on the safety and effectiveness of regorafenib demonstrated in RESORCE, in underrepresented subgroups (CP–B, BCLC stage B/C, pOLT) and in those previously treated with TACE/TARE.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100490,"journal":{"name":"ESMO Gastrointestinal Oncology","volume":"11 ","pages":"Article 100292"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146038191","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Comparative outcomes with low-dose and standard-dose immune checkpoint inhibitors in microsatellite stable advanced gastric/gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma☆ 低剂量和标准剂量免疫检查点抑制剂治疗微卫星稳定的晚期胃/胃食管腺癌的比较结果
Pub Date : 2026-03-01 Epub Date: 2026-02-09 DOI: 10.1016/j.esmogo.2026.100302
A. Ramaswamy , V. Shenoy , A. Bahl , A. Rauthan , V.M. Krishna , V. Talwar , V. Agarwala , A. Kapoor , R. Pinninti , M. Sharma , S.J. Rajappa , N. Rohatgi , A. Khan , A. Jain , U. Batra , R.K. Kaushal , M.V. Chandrakanth , B. Sansar , A. Gupta , P. Bhargava , V. Ostwal

Background

The combination of chemotherapy and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) is usually considered standard in advanced gastric/gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma (GC) with combined positive score (CPS) 6≥5.

Methods

Data of patients with microsatellite stable advanced GCs receiving chemotherapy combined with ICIs between August 2021 and February 2024 were collated from eight institutions in India. The primary endpoint was to compare median overall survival between patients receiving standard-dose ICIs (SD-ICIs) and low-dose ICIs (LD-ICIs) as first-line treatment when CPS ≥5.

Results

Data of 288 patients were collated, of whom 256 patients had adequate data for analysis. A CPS ≥5 was seen in 161 patients (63%). Nivolumab was used in a majority of patients (75%). After propensity matching for age, 124 patients (62 patients receiving LD-ICIs and SD-ICIs, each) were available for analysis. With a median follow-up of 9.8 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 7.6-12.1 months], there was no difference in median overall survival between patients receiving LD-ICIs and SD-ICIs (16.8 months, 95% CI 7.59-25.97 months versus 16.1 months, 95% CI 10.3 months-not reached, P = 0.95). There was also no difference in median time to treatment failure between patients receiving LD-ICIs and SD-ICIs (6.83 months, 95% CI 4.65-9.01 months versus 7.78 months, 95% CI 6.04-9.56 months, P = 0.31).

Conclusions

LD-ICIs can be evaluated in combination with chemotherapy in patients with advanced GC and CPS ≥5 where standard dosing is not feasible, pending evidence from prospective trials.
化疗联合免疫检查点抑制剂(ici)通常被认为是联合阳性评分(CPS) 6≥5的晚期胃/胃食管腺癌(GC)的标准治疗方案。方法整理印度8家机构2021年8月至2024年2月期间接受化疗联合ICIs的微卫星稳定晚期GCs患者数据。主要终点是比较当CPS≥5时接受标准剂量ICIs (SD-ICIs)和低剂量ICIs (LD-ICIs)作为一线治疗的患者的中位总生存期。结果整理288例患者资料,其中256例有充分资料可供分析。161例(63%)患者CPS≥5。大多数患者(75%)使用Nivolumab。年龄倾向匹配后,124例患者(分别接受LD-ICIs和SD-ICIs的患者各62例)可用于分析。中位随访时间为9.8个月[95%可信区间(CI) 7.6-12.1个月],接受ld - ici和sd - ici的患者的中位总生存期无差异(16.8个月,95% CI 7.59-25.97个月vs 16.1个月,95% CI 10.3个月,未达到,P = 0.95)。接受LD-ICIs和SD-ICIs的患者到治疗失败的中位时间也无差异(6.83个月,95% CI 4.65-9.01个月对7.78个月,95% CI 6.04-9.56个月,P = 0.31)。结论在标准剂量不可行的晚期GC和CPS≥5的患者中,sd - icis可与化疗联合评估,有待于前瞻性试验的证据。
{"title":"Comparative outcomes with low-dose and standard-dose immune checkpoint inhibitors in microsatellite stable advanced gastric/gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma☆","authors":"A. Ramaswamy ,&nbsp;V. Shenoy ,&nbsp;A. Bahl ,&nbsp;A. Rauthan ,&nbsp;V.M. Krishna ,&nbsp;V. Talwar ,&nbsp;V. Agarwala ,&nbsp;A. Kapoor ,&nbsp;R. Pinninti ,&nbsp;M. Sharma ,&nbsp;S.J. Rajappa ,&nbsp;N. Rohatgi ,&nbsp;A. Khan ,&nbsp;A. Jain ,&nbsp;U. Batra ,&nbsp;R.K. Kaushal ,&nbsp;M.V. Chandrakanth ,&nbsp;B. Sansar ,&nbsp;A. Gupta ,&nbsp;P. Bhargava ,&nbsp;V. Ostwal","doi":"10.1016/j.esmogo.2026.100302","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.esmogo.2026.100302","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The combination of chemotherapy and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) is usually considered standard in advanced gastric/gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma (GC) with combined positive score (CPS) 6≥5.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Data of patients with microsatellite stable advanced GCs receiving chemotherapy combined with ICIs between August 2021 and February 2024 were collated from eight institutions in India. The primary endpoint was to compare median overall survival between patients receiving standard-dose ICIs (SD-ICIs) and low-dose ICIs (LD-ICIs) as first-line treatment when CPS ≥5.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Data of 288 patients were collated, of whom 256 patients had adequate data for analysis. A CPS ≥5 was seen in 161 patients (63%). Nivolumab was used in a majority of patients (75%). After propensity matching for age, 124 patients (62 patients receiving LD-ICIs and SD-ICIs, each) were available for analysis. With a median follow-up of 9.8 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 7.6-12.1 months], there was no difference in median overall survival between patients receiving LD-ICIs and SD-ICIs (16.8 months, 95% CI 7.59-25.97 months versus 16.1 months, 95% CI 10.3 months-not reached, <em>P</em> = 0.95). There was also no difference in median time to treatment failure between patients receiving LD-ICIs and SD-ICIs (6.83 months, 95% CI 4.65-9.01 months versus 7.78 months, 95% CI 6.04-9.56 months, <em>P</em> = 0.31).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>LD-ICIs can be evaluated in combination with chemotherapy in patients with advanced GC and CPS ≥5 where standard dosing is not feasible, pending evidence from prospective trials.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100490,"journal":{"name":"ESMO Gastrointestinal Oncology","volume":"11 ","pages":"Article 100302"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146188602","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Impact of nutritional risk screening on outcomes of first-line treatment in metastatic esophagogastric adenocarcinoma: a secondary analysis of the AIO-MATEO trial 营养风险筛查对转移性食管胃腺癌一线治疗结果的影响:AIO-MATEO试验的二次分析
Pub Date : 2026-03-01 Epub Date: 2026-01-27 DOI: 10.1016/j.esmogo.2025.100297
R. Stelmach , S. Lorenzen , T.J. Ettrich , F.R. Longo , B. Chibaudel , R. Greil , M. Perwög , J. Larcher-Steiner , D. Jäger , F. Lordick , G. Stocker , G.M. Haag

Background

Malnutrition is common in patients with metastatic esophagogastric adenocarcinoma (EGA). However, the prognostic impact of nutritional risk screening (NRS) in advanced EGA remains underexplored. This preplanned analysis of the phase II AIO-MATEO trial evaluated the impact of NRS on clinical outcomes for patients with advanced EGA.

Patients and methods

Patients enrolled in the MATEO trial (exploring S-1 maintenance therapy) with an available baseline NRS before induction chemotherapy were included. Patients were stratified by their baseline NRS score (<3 versus ≥3). Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed using the Kaplan–Meier and Cox regression methods.

Results

Of the 136 patients, 86 had an NRS score <3 and 50 had an NRS score ≥3 at baseline. Baseline median European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ C30) global health score was lower for the NRS ≥3 group (37.5 versus 58.3). Nutritional interventions were more frequent in the NRS ≥3 group (45.8% versus 10.6%; P < 0.001). Patients with NRS ≥3 had inferior median PFS (4.9 months versus 6.9 months; P = 0.025) and OS (8.2 months versus 13.2 months; P = 0.003). Patients whose NRS score improved during induction chemotherapy showed superior median PFS (7.4 months versus 4.1 months; P = 0.085) and OS (20.1 months versus 8.0 months; P = 0.054) compared with those without improvement. No significant differences in overall toxicity were observed.

Conclusions

Baseline NRS is a significant predictor of outcome in patients with metastatic EGA. Our findings underscore the importance of routinely assessing the nutritional status of patients with metastatic EGA and intervening early.
背景:营养不良在转移性食管胃腺癌(EGA)患者中很常见。然而,营养风险筛查(NRS)对晚期EGA的预后影响仍未得到充分探讨。这项预先计划的II期AIO-MATEO试验分析了NRS对晚期EGA患者临床结果的影响。患者和方法纳入在诱导化疗前具有可用基线NRS的MATEO试验(探索S-1维持治疗)的患者。根据基线NRS评分(<;3和≥3)对患者进行分层。采用Kaplan-Meier和Cox回归分析无进展生存期(PFS)和总生存期(OS)。结果136例患者中,86例基线时NRS评分为<;3, 50例基线时NRS评分≥3。欧洲癌症研究和治疗组织生活质量问卷核心30 (EORTC QLQ C30)总体健康评分基线中位数在NRS≥3组较低(37.5比58.3)。营养干预在NRS≥3组更为频繁(45.8% vs 10.6%; P < 0.001)。NRS≥3的患者中位PFS(4.9个月对6.9个月,P = 0.025)和OS(8.2个月对13.2个月,P = 0.003)较差。诱导化疗期间NRS评分改善的患者的中位PFS(7.4个月对4.1个月,P = 0.085)和OS(20.1个月对8.0个月,P = 0.054)优于未改善的患者。总体毒性没有观察到显著差异。结论基线NRS是转移性EGA患者预后的重要预测指标。我们的研究结果强调了常规评估转移性EGA患者营养状况和早期干预的重要性。
{"title":"Impact of nutritional risk screening on outcomes of first-line treatment in metastatic esophagogastric adenocarcinoma: a secondary analysis of the AIO-MATEO trial","authors":"R. Stelmach ,&nbsp;S. Lorenzen ,&nbsp;T.J. Ettrich ,&nbsp;F.R. Longo ,&nbsp;B. Chibaudel ,&nbsp;R. Greil ,&nbsp;M. Perwög ,&nbsp;J. Larcher-Steiner ,&nbsp;D. Jäger ,&nbsp;F. Lordick ,&nbsp;G. Stocker ,&nbsp;G.M. Haag","doi":"10.1016/j.esmogo.2025.100297","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.esmogo.2025.100297","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Malnutrition is common in patients with metastatic esophagogastric adenocarcinoma (EGA). However, the prognostic impact of nutritional risk screening (NRS) in advanced EGA remains underexplored. This preplanned analysis of the phase II AIO-MATEO trial evaluated the impact of NRS on clinical outcomes for patients with advanced EGA.</div></div><div><h3>Patients and methods</h3><div>Patients enrolled in the MATEO trial (exploring S-1 maintenance therapy) with an available baseline NRS before induction chemotherapy were included. Patients were stratified by their baseline NRS score (&lt;3 versus ≥3). Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed using the Kaplan–Meier and Cox regression methods.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of the 136 patients, 86 had an NRS score &lt;3 and 50 had an NRS score ≥3 at baseline. Baseline median European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ C30) global health score was lower for the NRS ≥3 group (37.5 versus 58.3). Nutritional interventions were more frequent in the NRS ≥3 group (45.8% versus 10.6%; <em>P</em> &lt; 0.001). Patients with NRS ≥3 had inferior median PFS (4.9 months versus 6.9 months; <em>P</em> = 0.025) and OS (8.2 months versus 13.2 months; <em>P</em> = 0.003). Patients whose NRS score improved during induction chemotherapy showed superior median PFS (7.4 months versus 4.1 months; <em>P</em> = 0.085) and OS (20.1 months versus 8.0 months; <em>P</em> = 0.054) compared with those without improvement. No significant differences in overall toxicity were observed.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Baseline NRS is a significant predictor of outcome in patients with metastatic EGA. Our findings underscore the importance of routinely assessing the nutritional status of patients with metastatic EGA and intervening early.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100490,"journal":{"name":"ESMO Gastrointestinal Oncology","volume":"11 ","pages":"Article 100297"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146078108","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Highlights in oesophagogastric cancers from ESMO congress 2025 2025年ESMO大会上的食道胃癌亮点
Pub Date : 2026-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-12-15 DOI: 10.1016/j.esmogo.2025.100275
A. Petrillo , F. Pietrantonio , T. Fleitas-Kanonnikoff
{"title":"Highlights in oesophagogastric cancers from ESMO congress 2025","authors":"A. Petrillo ,&nbsp;F. Pietrantonio ,&nbsp;T. Fleitas-Kanonnikoff","doi":"10.1016/j.esmogo.2025.100275","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.esmogo.2025.100275","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":100490,"journal":{"name":"ESMO Gastrointestinal Oncology","volume":"11 ","pages":"Article 100275"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145791902","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Real-world treatment outcomes for pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours: a single tertiary referral institute experience 胰腺神经内分泌肿瘤的真实世界治疗结果:单一三级转诊机构经验
Pub Date : 2026-03-01 Epub Date: 2026-01-27 DOI: 10.1016/j.esmogo.2025.100293
L.L. Chan , A.C.Y. Lam , H.H.W. Leung , S.H. Chok , S.Y.W. Liu , J.W.C. Kung , R. Ozaki , A.P.S. Kong , R.C.W. Ma , S.L. Chan

Background

Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours (PNETs) are rare neoplasms of the pancreas. Real-world treatment outcomes in Asia are seldom reported. The aim of this study was to provide the real-world treatment outcomes of PNETs at a single tertiary cancer centre in Hong Kong over an 18-year period.

Materials and methods

This was a retrospective cohort study that recruits patients with local or metastatic PNETs treated at Prince of Wales Hospital, Hong Kong between 2005 and 2023. Five-year overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), recurrence-free survival (RFS) of the surgical cohort, and survival outcomes in patients with metastatic disease were summarized.

Results

A total of 98 patients were recruited (median age: 59 years, 51% male). Among them, 18 patients (18.4%) had functioning tumours, of which majority were insulinoma (72.2%). Most tumours (64.8%) were classified as grade 1 disease. More than 80% of patients had early-stage disease on presentation, with only 14 patients presented with stage IV disease. Five-year OS for the entire cohort was 88.4% and the 5-year PFS was 73.7%. Older age [hazard ratio (HR) 1.06, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.00-1.13, P = 0.04] and larger tumour size (HR 1.20, 95% CI 1.00-1.44, P = 0.05) were associated with worse OS, whereas patients with metastatic disease had a shorter PFS (HR 7.95, 95% CI 2.55-24.8, P < 0.001). In the cohort treated with curative surgery, metastatic disease (HR 7.49, 95% CI 1.40-40.0, P = 0.018) and tumour grade (HR 8.03, 95% CI 1.58-40.8, P = 0.012) were associated with worse RFS. Microscopic margin involvement did not influence RFS in patients treated with curative surgery. In the 20 patients who received systemic therapy, everolimus showed a trend towards improved PFS compared with chemotherapy (5-year PFS: 46.9% versus 16.7%).

Conclusion

Patients with PNETs in Hong Kong have early presentation and excellent prognosis with most patients being eligible for curative surgery reaching 90% of 5-year OS.
胰腺神经内分泌肿瘤(PNETs)是一种罕见的胰腺肿瘤。亚洲的实际治疗结果很少被报道。本研究的目的是提供PNETs在香港单一三级癌症中心18年期间的实际治疗结果。材料和方法本研究是一项回顾性队列研究,招募2005年至2023年间在香港威尔斯亲王医院接受治疗的局部或转移性PNETs患者。总结了手术队列的5年总生存期(OS)、无进展生存期(PFS)、无复发生存期(RFS)以及转移性疾病患者的生存结局。结果共纳入98例患者(中位年龄59岁,男性占51%)。其中功能性肿瘤18例(18.4%),以胰岛素瘤居多(72.2%)。大多数肿瘤(64.8%)被归类为1级疾病。超过80%的患者在就诊时为早期疾病,只有14例患者表现为IV期疾病。整个队列的5年OS为88.4%,5年PFS为73.7%。年龄较大[危险比(HR) 1.06, 95%可信区间(CI) 1.00-1.13, P = 0.04]和肿瘤大小较大(HR 1.20, 95% CI 1.00-1.44, P = 0.05)与较差的OS相关,而转移性疾病患者的PFS较短(HR 7.95, 95% CI 2.55-24.8, P < 0.001)。在接受根治性手术治疗的队列中,转移性疾病(HR 7.49, 95% CI 1.40-40.0, P = 0.018)和肿瘤分级(HR 8.03, 95% CI 1.58-40.8, P = 0.012)与较差的RFS相关。显微切缘受累不影响根治性手术患者的RFS。在接受全身治疗的20例患者中,与化疗相比,依维莫司显示出改善PFS的趋势(5年PFS: 46.9%对16.7%)。结论香港PNETs患者临床表现较早,预后较好,大多数患者的5年总生存率达到90%。
{"title":"Real-world treatment outcomes for pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours: a single tertiary referral institute experience","authors":"L.L. Chan ,&nbsp;A.C.Y. Lam ,&nbsp;H.H.W. Leung ,&nbsp;S.H. Chok ,&nbsp;S.Y.W. Liu ,&nbsp;J.W.C. Kung ,&nbsp;R. Ozaki ,&nbsp;A.P.S. Kong ,&nbsp;R.C.W. Ma ,&nbsp;S.L. Chan","doi":"10.1016/j.esmogo.2025.100293","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.esmogo.2025.100293","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours (PNETs) are rare neoplasms of the pancreas. Real-world treatment outcomes in Asia are seldom reported. The aim of this study was to provide the real-world treatment outcomes of PNETs at a single tertiary cancer centre in Hong Kong over an 18-year period.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><div>This was a retrospective cohort study that recruits patients with local or metastatic PNETs treated at Prince of Wales Hospital, Hong Kong between 2005 and 2023. Five-year overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), recurrence-free survival (RFS) of the surgical cohort, and survival outcomes in patients with metastatic disease were summarized.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 98 patients were recruited (median age: 59 years, 51% male). Among them, 18 patients (18.4%) had functioning tumours, of which majority were insulinoma (72.2%). Most tumours (64.8%) were classified as grade 1 disease. More than 80% of patients had early-stage disease on presentation, with only 14 patients presented with stage IV disease. Five-year OS for the entire cohort was 88.4% and the 5-year PFS was 73.7%. Older age [hazard ratio (HR) 1.06, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.00-1.13, <em>P</em> = 0.04] and larger tumour size (HR 1.20, 95% CI 1.00-1.44, <em>P</em> = 0.05) were associated with worse OS, whereas patients with metastatic disease had a shorter PFS (HR 7.95, 95% CI 2.55-24.8, <em>P</em> &lt; 0.001). In the cohort treated with curative surgery, metastatic disease (HR 7.49, 95% CI 1.40-40.0, <em>P</em> = 0.018) and tumour grade (HR 8.03, 95% CI 1.58-40.8, <em>P</em> = 0.012) were associated with worse RFS. Microscopic margin involvement did not influence RFS in patients treated with curative surgery. In the 20 patients who received systemic therapy, everolimus showed a trend towards improved PFS compared with chemotherapy (5-year PFS: 46.9% versus 16.7%).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Patients with PNETs in Hong Kong have early presentation and excellent prognosis with most patients being eligible for curative surgery reaching 90% of 5-year OS.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100490,"journal":{"name":"ESMO Gastrointestinal Oncology","volume":"11 ","pages":"Article 100293"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146078110","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Impact of claudin 18.2 expression on the efficacy of trastuzumab deruxtecan in patients with HER2-positive gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer claudin 18.2表达对曲妥珠单抗德鲁西替康治疗her2阳性胃癌或胃食管结癌疗效的影响
Pub Date : 2026-03-01 Epub Date: 2026-01-27 DOI: 10.1016/j.esmogo.2025.100300
D. Okemoto , I. Nakayama , A. Jubashi , N. Sakamoto , M. Okunaka , Y. Matsubara , Y. Miyashita , A. Kobayashi , U. Okazaki , K. Yamamoto , K. Seguchi , T. Hosokai , T. Ogura , S. Mishima , D. Kotani , A. Kawazoe , T. Hashimoto , Y. Kuboki , H. Bando , T. Kojima , K. Shitara

Background

Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) and claudin 18.2 (CLDN18.2) are key therapeutic targets in metastatic gastric and gastroesophageal junction cancer (mGC/GEJC). Trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) is standard care for previously treated HER2-positive mGC/GEJC, but the prognostic impact of CLDN18.2 remains unclear.

Patients and methods

We retrospectively reviewed patients with HER2-positive mGC/GEJC treated with T-DXd at National Cancer Center Hospital East until February 2025. T-DXd outcomes were compared between CLDN18.2-positive (≥2+ in ≥75% of tumor cells) and -negative patients in two cohorts: those with HER2 positivity before first-line therapy (overall cohort) and those maintaining HER2 positivity immediately before T-DXd (remaining HER2 cohort). CLDN18.2 expression was evaluated at any time before T-DXd administration.

Results

Eighty-seven patients were included in the overall cohort and 30 in the remaining HER2 cohort. In the overall cohort, progression-free survival (PFS) was shorter in CLDN18.2-positive patients [3.9 versus 5.3 months; hazard ratio (HR) 1.87, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.04-3.34, P = 0.036], with an adjusted HR of 1.82 (95% CI 1.02-3.28, P = 0.047). Overall survival (OS) showed a shorter trend (8.6 versus 11.2 months, HR 1.36, 95% CI 0.76-2.45, P = 0.30). In the remaining HER2 cohort, CLDN18.2-positive patients had shorter PFS (3.2 versus 8.0 months, HR 3.40, 95% CI 1.38-8.40, P = 0.008) and OS (7.1 versus 12.9 months, HR 2.44, 95% CI 1.04-5.74, P = 0.041).

Conclusions

CLDN18.2 positivity may attenuate the efficacy of T-DXd in HER2-positive mGC/GEJC, supporting the rationale for dual blockade of CLDN18.2 and HER2.
人表皮生长因子受体2 (HER2)和claudin 18.2 (CLDN18.2)是转移性胃癌和胃食管结癌(mGC/GEJC)的关键治疗靶点。曲妥珠单抗德鲁西替康(T-DXd)是先前治疗过的her2阳性mGC/GEJC的标准治疗,但CLDN18.2的预后影响尚不清楚。患者和方法我们回顾性地回顾了到2025年2月在国立癌症中心东医院接受T-DXd治疗的her2阳性mGC/GEJC患者。比较cldn18.2阳性(≥75%的肿瘤细胞≥2+)和阴性患者的T-DXd结果,分为两个队列:一线治疗前HER2阳性患者(总队列)和T-DXd前立即保持HER2阳性的患者(剩余HER2队列)。在给药前的任何时间检测CLDN18.2的表达。结果87例患者被纳入总队列,30例患者被纳入剩余HER2队列。在整个队列中,cldn18.2阳性患者的无进展生存期(PFS)较短[3.9个月对5.3个月;风险比(HR) 1.87, 95%可信区间(CI) 1.04 ~ 3.34, P = 0.036],调整后的风险比为1.82 (95% CI 1.02 ~ 3.28, P = 0.047)。总生存期(OS)呈短趋势(8.6个月vs 11.2个月,HR 1.36, 95% CI 0.76-2.45, P = 0.30)。在其余的HER2队列中,CLDN18.2阳性患者的PFS(3.2个月vs 8.0个月,HR 3.40, 95% CI 1.38-8.40, P = 0.008)和OS(7.1个月vs 12.9个月,HR 2.44, 95% CI 1.04-5.74, P = 0.041)较短。结论CLDN18.2阳性可能会减弱T-DXd在HER2阳性mGC/GEJC中的疗效,支持CLDN18.2和HER2双重阻断的理论基础。
{"title":"Impact of claudin 18.2 expression on the efficacy of trastuzumab deruxtecan in patients with HER2-positive gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer","authors":"D. Okemoto ,&nbsp;I. Nakayama ,&nbsp;A. Jubashi ,&nbsp;N. Sakamoto ,&nbsp;M. Okunaka ,&nbsp;Y. Matsubara ,&nbsp;Y. Miyashita ,&nbsp;A. Kobayashi ,&nbsp;U. Okazaki ,&nbsp;K. Yamamoto ,&nbsp;K. Seguchi ,&nbsp;T. Hosokai ,&nbsp;T. Ogura ,&nbsp;S. Mishima ,&nbsp;D. Kotani ,&nbsp;A. Kawazoe ,&nbsp;T. Hashimoto ,&nbsp;Y. Kuboki ,&nbsp;H. Bando ,&nbsp;T. Kojima ,&nbsp;K. Shitara","doi":"10.1016/j.esmogo.2025.100300","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.esmogo.2025.100300","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) and claudin 18.2 (CLDN18.2) are key therapeutic targets in metastatic gastric and gastroesophageal junction cancer (mGC/GEJC). Trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) is standard care for previously treated HER2-positive mGC/GEJC, but the prognostic impact of CLDN18.2 remains unclear.</div></div><div><h3>Patients and methods</h3><div>We retrospectively reviewed patients with HER2-positive mGC/GEJC treated with T-DXd at National Cancer Center Hospital East until February 2025. T-DXd outcomes were compared between CLDN18.2-positive (≥2+ in ≥75% of tumor cells) and -negative patients in two cohorts: those with HER2 positivity before first-line therapy (overall cohort) and those maintaining HER2 positivity immediately before T-DXd (remaining HER2 cohort). CLDN18.2 expression was evaluated at any time before T-DXd administration.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Eighty-seven patients were included in the overall cohort and 30 in the remaining HER2 cohort. In the overall cohort, progression-free survival (PFS) was shorter in CLDN18.2-positive patients [3.9 versus 5.3 months; hazard ratio (HR) 1.87, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.04-3.34, <em>P</em> = 0.036], with an adjusted HR of 1.82 (95% CI 1.02-3.28, <em>P</em> = 0.047). Overall survival (OS) showed a shorter trend (8.6 versus 11.2 months, HR 1.36, 95% CI 0.76-2.45, <em>P</em> = 0.30). In the remaining HER2 cohort, CLDN18.2-positive patients had shorter PFS (3.2 versus 8.0 months, HR 3.40, 95% CI 1.38-8.40, <em>P</em> = 0.008) and OS (7.1 versus 12.9 months, HR 2.44, 95% CI 1.04-5.74, <em>P</em> = 0.041).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>CLDN18.2 positivity may attenuate the efficacy of T-DXd in HER2-positive mGC/GEJC, supporting the rationale for dual blockade of CLDN18.2 and HER2.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100490,"journal":{"name":"ESMO Gastrointestinal Oncology","volume":"11 ","pages":"Article 100300"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146078107","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
BevRam-GC01 study protocol: a phase I trial of bevacizumab plus ramucirumab and paclitaxel in advanced gastric cancer BevRam-GC01研究方案:贝伐单抗联合ramucirumab和紫杉醇治疗晚期胃癌的I期试验
Pub Date : 2026-03-01 Epub Date: 2026-02-10 DOI: 10.1016/j.esmogo.2025.100299
T. Wakatsuki , T. Mashima , N. Miyazaki , H. Osumi , S. Fukuoka , A. Ooki , K. Shimozaki , M. Ogura , K. Yoshino , S. Udagawa , E. Shinozaki , K. Chin , N. Ishida , H. Seimiya , K. Yamaguchi

Background

Plasma vascular endothelial growth factor-A (VEGF-A) concentrations markedly increased immediately after ramucirumab administration, and the high VEGF-A concentrations were significantly associated with worse outcomes in advanced gastric cancer. In a preclinical study, combination therapy with anti-VEGF-A and anti-vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 (VEGFR2) antibodies showed superior tumor suppression compared with monotherapy, suggesting dual VEGF-A/VEGFR2 blockade may be a promising therapeutic strategy.

Design

The BevRam-GC01 trial is a phase I trial evaluating the tolerability and safety of bevacizumab biosimilar (5 or 10 mg/kg) plus ramucirumab (8 mg/kg) and paclitaxel (80 mg/m2) in patients with advanced gastric cancer refractory to first-line fluoropyrimidine–platinum chemotherapy. The study includes a safety part and an expansion part, in which, after confirming tolerability, patients will be randomized into three arms, including a control group, to obtain proof of concept and determine the optimal BEV-BS dose. Primary endpoints are dose-limiting toxicities in the safety part and adverse events in the expansion part. Key secondary endpoints include objective response rate and day 8 free VEGF-A suppression rate. Biomarker analysis will clarify the synergistic and complementary effects of anti-VEGFR2 and anti-VEGF-A antibodies on tumor biology, including angiogenesis, proliferation, and antitumor immunity, through multi-omics analysis and immune monitoring.
背景:ramucirumab给药后血浆血管内皮生长因子- a (VEGF-A)浓度立即显著升高,且高VEGF-A浓度与晚期胃癌预后不良显著相关。在一项临床前研究中,与单药治疗相比,抗VEGF-A和抗血管内皮生长因子受体2 (VEGFR2)抗体联合治疗显示出更好的肿瘤抑制效果,这表明双重VEGF-A/VEGFR2阻断可能是一种很有前景的治疗策略。bevramm - gc01试验是一项I期试验,评估贝伐单抗生物类似药(5或10 mg/kg)加ramucirumab (8 mg/kg)和紫杉醇(80 mg/m2)对一线氟嘧啶-铂化疗难治的晚期胃癌患者的耐受性和安全性。该研究包括安全部分和扩展部分,在确定耐受性后,将患者随机分为三组,包括对照组,以获得概念证明并确定最佳BEV-BS剂量。主要终点是安全部分的剂量限制性毒性和扩展部分的不良事件。关键次要终点包括客观缓解率和第8天游离VEGF-A抑制率。生物标志物分析将通过多组学分析和免疫监测,阐明抗vegfr2和抗vegf - a抗体对肿瘤生物学的协同和互补作用,包括血管生成、增殖和抗肿瘤免疫。
{"title":"BevRam-GC01 study protocol: a phase I trial of bevacizumab plus ramucirumab and paclitaxel in advanced gastric cancer","authors":"T. Wakatsuki ,&nbsp;T. Mashima ,&nbsp;N. Miyazaki ,&nbsp;H. Osumi ,&nbsp;S. Fukuoka ,&nbsp;A. Ooki ,&nbsp;K. Shimozaki ,&nbsp;M. Ogura ,&nbsp;K. Yoshino ,&nbsp;S. Udagawa ,&nbsp;E. Shinozaki ,&nbsp;K. Chin ,&nbsp;N. Ishida ,&nbsp;H. Seimiya ,&nbsp;K. Yamaguchi","doi":"10.1016/j.esmogo.2025.100299","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.esmogo.2025.100299","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Plasma vascular endothelial growth factor-A (VEGF-A) concentrations markedly increased immediately after ramucirumab administration, and the high VEGF-A concentrations were significantly associated with worse outcomes in advanced gastric cancer. In a preclinical study, combination therapy with anti-VEGF-A and anti-vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 (VEGFR2) antibodies showed superior tumor suppression compared with monotherapy, suggesting dual VEGF-A/VEGFR2 blockade may be a promising therapeutic strategy.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>The BevRam-GC01 trial is a phase I trial evaluating the tolerability and safety of bevacizumab biosimilar (5 or 10 mg/kg) plus ramucirumab (8 mg/kg) and paclitaxel (80 mg/m<sup>2</sup>) in patients with advanced gastric cancer refractory to first-line fluoropyrimidine–platinum chemotherapy. The study includes a safety part and an expansion part, in which, after confirming tolerability, patients will be randomized into three arms, including a control group, to obtain proof of concept and determine the optimal BEV-BS dose. Primary endpoints are dose-limiting toxicities in the safety part and adverse events in the expansion part. Key secondary endpoints include objective response rate and day 8 free VEGF-A suppression rate. Biomarker analysis will clarify the synergistic and complementary effects of anti-VEGFR2 and anti-VEGF-A antibodies on tumor biology, including angiogenesis, proliferation, and antitumor immunity, through multi-omics analysis and immune monitoring.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100490,"journal":{"name":"ESMO Gastrointestinal Oncology","volume":"11 ","pages":"Article 100299"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146188607","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
ESMO Gastrointestinal Oncology
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1