Peter D. Clift , Tara N. Jonell , Yifan Du , Thomas Bornholdt
{"title":"The impact of Himalayan-Tibetan erosion on silicate weathering and organic carbon burial","authors":"Peter D. Clift , Tara N. Jonell , Yifan Du , Thomas Bornholdt","doi":"10.1016/j.chemgeo.2024.122106","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Cenozoic mountain building in Asia has been proposed as an important control over global climate by atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub> drawdown through silicate weathering and burial of organic carbon (OC) offshore. Because Asian submarine fans represent the most complete record of Asian orogenic erosion and weathering over the Cenozoic, evaluation of sediment major element chemistry and OC content can be used to estimate CO<sub>2</sub> sequestration rates driven by silicate chemical weathering and OC burial. From deep-sea fans in the Indian Ocean and South China Sea, weathering rates are calculated by comparison of weathered sediment to initial bedrock source compositions and then integrated with deposited volumes to derive the first regional weathering budget for India-Asia collision over the last ∼25 m.y. Results indicate the Indus is more important than previously recognized before and during the middle Miocene in sequestering CO<sub>2</sub> (∼76% of Asian total at 16–14 Ma). This in part reflects the more reactive mafic and ultramafic bedrock sources compared to the largest and major east Himalayan drainage, the Ganga-Brahmaputra, but also greater erosional flux from the onshore Indus drainage at that time. This regional synthesis further concludes that OC burial only represented a minority (20–25%) of the regional carbon budget but became more important after 17 Ma, peaking at ∼38% after ∼3 Ma. CO<sub>2</sub> sequestration rates increased from 17 to 15 Ma, coinciding with the Miocene Climatic Optimum, and remained mostly steady in Asia from ∼15–5 Ma as the climate cooled. Only one of three possible sediment flux models for the Bengal Fan predicts increased CO<sub>2</sub> consumption rates after 15 Ma and, even then, only predicts steady rates from 11 to 5 Ma. The timing of changes in CO<sub>2</sub> consumption rates are not consistent with Asian orogenic silicate weathering acting as the dominant control over late Cenozoic atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub>.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":9847,"journal":{"name":"Chemical Geology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0009254124001864/pdfft?md5=a24524c9d2a5be4e4cb1e79a2b57fc2f&pid=1-s2.0-S0009254124001864-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chemical Geology","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0009254124001864","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Cenozoic mountain building in Asia has been proposed as an important control over global climate by atmospheric CO2 drawdown through silicate weathering and burial of organic carbon (OC) offshore. Because Asian submarine fans represent the most complete record of Asian orogenic erosion and weathering over the Cenozoic, evaluation of sediment major element chemistry and OC content can be used to estimate CO2 sequestration rates driven by silicate chemical weathering and OC burial. From deep-sea fans in the Indian Ocean and South China Sea, weathering rates are calculated by comparison of weathered sediment to initial bedrock source compositions and then integrated with deposited volumes to derive the first regional weathering budget for India-Asia collision over the last ∼25 m.y. Results indicate the Indus is more important than previously recognized before and during the middle Miocene in sequestering CO2 (∼76% of Asian total at 16–14 Ma). This in part reflects the more reactive mafic and ultramafic bedrock sources compared to the largest and major east Himalayan drainage, the Ganga-Brahmaputra, but also greater erosional flux from the onshore Indus drainage at that time. This regional synthesis further concludes that OC burial only represented a minority (20–25%) of the regional carbon budget but became more important after 17 Ma, peaking at ∼38% after ∼3 Ma. CO2 sequestration rates increased from 17 to 15 Ma, coinciding with the Miocene Climatic Optimum, and remained mostly steady in Asia from ∼15–5 Ma as the climate cooled. Only one of three possible sediment flux models for the Bengal Fan predicts increased CO2 consumption rates after 15 Ma and, even then, only predicts steady rates from 11 to 5 Ma. The timing of changes in CO2 consumption rates are not consistent with Asian orogenic silicate weathering acting as the dominant control over late Cenozoic atmospheric CO2.
亚洲新生代的造山运动被认为是通过硅酸盐风化和有机碳(OC)的近海埋藏来减少大气中 CO 的排放,从而控制全球气候的重要手段。由于亚洲海底扇代表了新生代亚洲造山运动侵蚀和风化的最完整记录,对沉积物主要元素化学性质和 OC 含量的评估可用来估算硅酸盐化学风化和 OC 埋藏所驱动的 CO 封存率。从印度洋和南海的深海扇中,通过比较风化沉积物和初始基岩源成分,计算出风化率,然后与沉积量相结合,得出了过去 ∼ 25 m.y.印度-亚洲碰撞的首个区域风化预算。结果表明,在中新世之前和期间,印度河在封存 CO 方面的重要性超过了之前的认识(16-14 Ma 时占亚洲总量的 76%)。这在一定程度上反映了与喜马拉雅山东部最大的主要水系恒河-布拉马普特拉河相比,印度河的基岩来源具有更高的反应活性,同时也反映了当时来自印度河沿岸水系的侵蚀通量更大。该区域综合报告进一步得出结论,OC 埋藏仅占区域碳预算的少数(20-25%),但在 17 Ma 之后变得更加重要,在 ∼3 Ma 之后达到峰值 ∼38%。CO固碳率在17-15 Ma期间上升,与中新世气候最适宜期相吻合,并在∼15-5 Ma期间随着气候变冷在亚洲基本保持稳定。在孟加拉湾三个可能的沉积通量模型中,只有一个模型预测了 15 Ma 之后 CO 消耗率的增加,即使如此,也只预测了 11 Ma 至 5 Ma 期间的稳定速率。CO消耗率变化的时间与亚洲造山硅酸盐风化对新生代晚期大气CO的主要控制作用不一致。
期刊介绍:
Chemical Geology is an international journal that publishes original research papers on isotopic and elemental geochemistry, geochronology and cosmochemistry.
The Journal focuses on chemical processes in igneous, metamorphic, and sedimentary petrology, low- and high-temperature aqueous solutions, biogeochemistry, the environment and cosmochemistry.
Papers that are field, experimentally, or computationally based are appropriate if they are of broad international interest. The Journal generally does not publish papers that are primarily of regional or local interest, or which are primarily focused on remediation and applied geochemistry.
The Journal also welcomes innovative papers dealing with significant analytical advances that are of wide interest in the community and extend significantly beyond the scope of what would be included in the methods section of a standard research paper.