Gender and forest resources in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic literature review

IF 4 2区 农林科学 Q1 ECONOMICS Forest Policy and Economics Pub Date : 2024-04-25 DOI:10.1016/j.forpol.2024.103226
Verena Bitzer , Monika Moździerz , Rob Kuijpers , Greetje Schouten , Denabo Billo Juju
{"title":"Gender and forest resources in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic literature review","authors":"Verena Bitzer ,&nbsp;Monika Moździerz ,&nbsp;Rob Kuijpers ,&nbsp;Greetje Schouten ,&nbsp;Denabo Billo Juju","doi":"10.1016/j.forpol.2024.103226","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Numerous empirical studies have highlighted how women experience gender-based disadvantages in accessing, using, and exercising control over forest resources. This paper consolidates and analyses the increasingly rich empirical literature on gender and forest resources within low- and middle-income countries to unravel the multifaceted factors contributing to gender disparities. A systematic literature review comprising 135 studies was conducted analysing the gendered division of labour, access to and use of resources, decision-making power, and underlying gender norms. From the synthesis of these studies, we identify three key dimensions of gender norms affecting ‘gender and forest resources’. These can be conceptualised in terms of (1) gendered <em>space</em>, (2) gendered <em>hardship</em> of labour, and (3) gendered <em>purpose</em> of collecting and using forest resources. Each of these dimensions is characterized by internal contradictions, leading to a blurriness of what the norms dictate (‘what should be’) and the actual practices or reality (‘what is’). This begs the question: do the observed contradictions hinder the reinforcement of critical gender norms, or do they mark the beginning of a transformative shift in gender norms concerning forest resources?</p></div>","PeriodicalId":12451,"journal":{"name":"Forest Policy and Economics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1389934124000790/pdfft?md5=f08feb75054c9b5d10d3707d4dbd0548&pid=1-s2.0-S1389934124000790-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forest Policy and Economics","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1389934124000790","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Numerous empirical studies have highlighted how women experience gender-based disadvantages in accessing, using, and exercising control over forest resources. This paper consolidates and analyses the increasingly rich empirical literature on gender and forest resources within low- and middle-income countries to unravel the multifaceted factors contributing to gender disparities. A systematic literature review comprising 135 studies was conducted analysing the gendered division of labour, access to and use of resources, decision-making power, and underlying gender norms. From the synthesis of these studies, we identify three key dimensions of gender norms affecting ‘gender and forest resources’. These can be conceptualised in terms of (1) gendered space, (2) gendered hardship of labour, and (3) gendered purpose of collecting and using forest resources. Each of these dimensions is characterized by internal contradictions, leading to a blurriness of what the norms dictate (‘what should be’) and the actual practices or reality (‘what is’). This begs the question: do the observed contradictions hinder the reinforcement of critical gender norms, or do they mark the beginning of a transformative shift in gender norms concerning forest resources?

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
中低收入国家的性别与森林资源:系统文献综述
许多实证研究都强调了妇女在获取、使用和控制森林资源方面如何处于基于性别的不利地位。本文整合并分析了中低收入国家在性别和森林资源方面日益丰富的实证文献,以揭示造成性别差异的多方面因素。我们对 135 项研究进行了系统的文献综述,分析了性别分工、资源的获取和使用、决策权以及潜在的性别规范。综合这些研究,我们确定了影响 "性别与森林资源 "的性别规范的三个主要方面。这三个方面可以从以下角度来理解:(1) 性别空间;(2) 性别劳动艰辛;(3) 收集和使用森林资源的性别目的。其中每个方面都存在内部矛盾,导致规范规定("应该是什么")和实际做法或现实("是什么")之间的模糊不清。这就引出了一个问题:观察到的矛盾是阻碍了关键性别规范的加强,还是标志着有关森林资源的性别规范开始发生转变?
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Forest Policy and Economics
Forest Policy and Economics 农林科学-林学
CiteScore
9.00
自引率
7.50%
发文量
148
审稿时长
21.9 weeks
期刊介绍: Forest Policy and Economics is a leading scientific journal that publishes peer-reviewed policy and economics research relating to forests, forested landscapes, forest-related industries, and other forest-relevant land uses. It also welcomes contributions from other social sciences and humanities perspectives that make clear theoretical, conceptual and methodological contributions to the existing state-of-the-art literature on forests and related land use systems. These disciplines include, but are not limited to, sociology, anthropology, human geography, history, jurisprudence, planning, development studies, and psychology research on forests. Forest Policy and Economics is global in scope and publishes multiple article types of high scientific standard. Acceptance for publication is subject to a double-blind peer-review process.
期刊最新文献
Actors, discourses and relations in the Finnish newspapers' forest discussion: Enabling or constraining the sustainability transition? Leveraging the value chain-landscape governance nexus for non-wood forest products and tropical forest restoration Forest fire causes and prevention strategies in Portugal: Insights from stakeholder focus groups Trends in forest livelihoods research – Taking stock in 2024 The legally binding agreement on forests in Europe – Analyzing the unsuccessful attempts at regional regime creation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1