Randomised controlled trials evaluating artificial intelligence in clinical practice: a scoping review

IF 23.8 1区 医学 Q1 MEDICAL INFORMATICS Lancet Digital Health Pub Date : 2024-04-24 DOI:10.1016/S2589-7500(24)00047-5
Ryan Han MS , Julián N Acosta MD , Zahra Shakeri PhD , Prof John P A Ioannidis MD DSc , Prof Eric J Topol MD , Pranav Rajpurkar PhD
{"title":"Randomised controlled trials evaluating artificial intelligence in clinical practice: a scoping review","authors":"Ryan Han MS ,&nbsp;Julián N Acosta MD ,&nbsp;Zahra Shakeri PhD ,&nbsp;Prof John P A Ioannidis MD DSc ,&nbsp;Prof Eric J Topol MD ,&nbsp;Pranav Rajpurkar PhD","doi":"10.1016/S2589-7500(24)00047-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This scoping review of randomised controlled trials on artificial intelligence (AI) in clinical practice reveals an expanding interest in AI across clinical specialties and locations. The USA and China are leading in the number of trials, with a focus on deep learning systems for medical imaging, particularly in gastroenterology and radiology. A majority of trials (70 [81%] of 86) report positive primary endpoints, primarily related to diagnostic yield or performance; however, the predominance of single-centre trials, little demographic reporting, and varying reports of operational efficiency raise concerns about the generalisability and practicality of these results. Despite the promising outcomes, considering the likelihood of publication bias and the need for more comprehensive research including multicentre trials, diverse outcome measures, and improved reporting standards is crucial. Future AI trials should prioritise patient-relevant outcomes to fully understand AI's true effects and limitations in health care.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48534,"journal":{"name":"Lancet Digital Health","volume":"6 5","pages":"Pages e367-e373"},"PeriodicalIF":23.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589750024000475/pdfft?md5=9d9e22118ce0622e5f971accc65430f7&pid=1-s2.0-S2589750024000475-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lancet Digital Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589750024000475","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICAL INFORMATICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This scoping review of randomised controlled trials on artificial intelligence (AI) in clinical practice reveals an expanding interest in AI across clinical specialties and locations. The USA and China are leading in the number of trials, with a focus on deep learning systems for medical imaging, particularly in gastroenterology and radiology. A majority of trials (70 [81%] of 86) report positive primary endpoints, primarily related to diagnostic yield or performance; however, the predominance of single-centre trials, little demographic reporting, and varying reports of operational efficiency raise concerns about the generalisability and practicality of these results. Despite the promising outcomes, considering the likelihood of publication bias and the need for more comprehensive research including multicentre trials, diverse outcome measures, and improved reporting standards is crucial. Future AI trials should prioritise patient-relevant outcomes to fully understand AI's true effects and limitations in health care.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估临床实践中人工智能的随机对照试验:范围界定综述
这篇关于临床实践中人工智能(AI)随机对照试验的范围综述显示,各临床专科和地区对人工智能的兴趣日益浓厚。美国和中国的试验数量居首位,重点是医学影像的深度学习系统,尤其是在胃肠病学和放射学领域。大多数试验(86 项试验中的 70 项[81%])都报告了积极的主要终点,主要与诊断结果或性能有关;然而,单中心试验居多、人口统计报告较少以及关于运行效率的报告各不相同,这些都令人担忧这些结果的普遍性和实用性。尽管结果很有希望,但考虑到发表偏倚的可能性,以及需要进行更全面的研究,包括多中心试验、多样化的结果测量和改进的报告标准,这些都是至关重要的。未来的人工智能试验应优先考虑与患者相关的结果,以充分了解人工智能在医疗保健中的真正效果和局限性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
41.20
自引率
1.60%
发文量
232
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: The Lancet Digital Health publishes important, innovative, and practice-changing research on any topic connected with digital technology in clinical medicine, public health, and global health. The journal’s open access content crosses subject boundaries, building bridges between health professionals and researchers.By bringing together the most important advances in this multidisciplinary field,The Lancet Digital Health is the most prominent publishing venue in digital health. We publish a range of content types including Articles,Review, Comment, and Correspondence, contributing to promoting digital technologies in health practice worldwide.
期刊最新文献
Attitudes and perceptions of medical researchers towards the use of artificial intelligence chatbots in the scientific process: an international cross-sectional survey. Building robust, proportionate, and timely approaches to regulation and evaluation of digital mental health technologies. Advancing the management of maternal, fetal, and neonatal infection through harnessing digital health innovations. Innovative diagnostic technologies: navigating regulatory frameworks through advances, challenges, and future prospects. Using digital health technologies to optimise antimicrobial use globally.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1