The intrinsic value of decision rights: Field evidence from electricity contract choice automation

IF 2.6 3区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS Resource and Energy Economics Pub Date : 2024-04-04 DOI:10.1016/j.reseneeco.2024.101440
Christoph Feldhaus , Jörg Lingens , Andreas Löschel , Gerald Zunker
{"title":"The intrinsic value of decision rights: Field evidence from electricity contract choice automation","authors":"Christoph Feldhaus ,&nbsp;Jörg Lingens ,&nbsp;Andreas Löschel ,&nbsp;Gerald Zunker","doi":"10.1016/j.reseneeco.2024.101440","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Previous laboratory evidence suggests that people tend to value their decision right beyond its instrumental value. We measure the intrinsic value of decision rights in the context of switching the electricity provider. We focus on customers of an online platform who can either choose a service that reminds them when they are allowed to switch their electricity contract or a service that automatically switches the contract on their behalf whenever possible. Our focus is on the intrinsic value of decision rights as a potential obstacle of this choice automation. Surprisingly, we find that customers who make use of the automation service assign significantly <em>higher</em> intrinsic value to their decision rights, compared to those who opted for the mere reminder. Hence, there appears to be a connection between having a high intrinsic value of decision rights and the level of interest in attributes of the automation service under consideration. The positive correlation suggests that the widespread positive intrinsic value of decision rights and the future adoption of similar automation services and devices do not necessarily contradict each other.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47952,"journal":{"name":"Resource and Energy Economics","volume":"78 ","pages":"Article 101440"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0928765524000162/pdfft?md5=24c7000813a727694d89d25c9147f7eb&pid=1-s2.0-S0928765524000162-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Resource and Energy Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0928765524000162","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Previous laboratory evidence suggests that people tend to value their decision right beyond its instrumental value. We measure the intrinsic value of decision rights in the context of switching the electricity provider. We focus on customers of an online platform who can either choose a service that reminds them when they are allowed to switch their electricity contract or a service that automatically switches the contract on their behalf whenever possible. Our focus is on the intrinsic value of decision rights as a potential obstacle of this choice automation. Surprisingly, we find that customers who make use of the automation service assign significantly higher intrinsic value to their decision rights, compared to those who opted for the mere reminder. Hence, there appears to be a connection between having a high intrinsic value of decision rights and the level of interest in attributes of the automation service under consideration. The positive correlation suggests that the widespread positive intrinsic value of decision rights and the future adoption of similar automation services and devices do not necessarily contradict each other.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
决策权的内在价值:电力合同选择自动化的实地证据
以往的实验室证据表明,人们对决策权的重视往往超出了其工具价值。我们以更换电力供应商为背景来衡量决策权的内在价值。我们的研究对象是一个在线平台的客户,他们可以选择一项服务,提醒他们何时可以转换电力合同,或者选择一项服务,在可能的情况下自动代表他们转换合同。我们关注的重点是决策权的内在价值,它是这种选择自动化的潜在障碍。出乎意料的是,我们发现使用自动化服务的客户对其决策权的内在价值的赋予明显高于仅选择提醒服务的客户。因此,决策权的内在价值高低与对所考虑的自动化服务属性的兴趣程度之间似乎存在联系。这种正相关性表明,决策权的内在价值普遍为正与未来采用类似的自动化服务和设备并不一定相互矛盾。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
41
期刊介绍: Resource and Energy Economics provides a forum for high level economic analysis of utilization and development of the earth natural resources. The subject matter encompasses questions of optimal production and consumption affecting energy, minerals, land, air and water, and includes analysis of firm and industry behavior, environmental issues and public policies. Implications for both developed and developing countries are of concern. The journal publishes high quality papers for an international audience. Innovative energy, resource and environmental analyses, including theoretical models and empirical studies are appropriate for publication in Resource and Energy Economics.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Observability and stakeholder conflict in resources management Accounting for baseline individual and site characteristics when estimating recreational demand for specialized activities Spreading the word! Effects of a randomized normative informational campaign on residential water conservation Delegation of environmental regulation and perceived corruption in South Africa
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1