Which reading comprehension is better? A meta-analysis of the effect of paper versus digital reading in recent 20 years

Yifan Li, Lingling Yan
{"title":"Which reading comprehension is better? A meta-analysis of the effect of paper versus digital reading in recent 20 years","authors":"Yifan Li,&nbsp;Lingling Yan","doi":"10.1016/j.teler.2024.100142","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The development of digital technology has changed the audience's reading behavior and reading habits, and the difference between digital reading and paper reading has become a research hot spot. However, the academic circle has not reached an agreement on the reading effect of digital reading and paper reading. This study included 37 experimental studies for meta-analysis and analyzed the influence of moderating variables such as audience characteristics, text characteristics, and reading conditions. This study deepens the understanding of the reading effect and provides a reference for improving it. The study shows no significant difference in overall reading comprehension between digital reading and paper reading, and there are differences under moderating variables. The study has revealed that digital reading and paper reading have advantages and disadvantages and complement each other. The publishing industry should develop corresponding knowledge service products based on the characteristics of reading effects to promote the healthy development of the reading industry.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101213,"journal":{"name":"Telematics and Informatics Reports","volume":"14 ","pages":"Article 100142"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772503024000288/pdfft?md5=14d43a71c8f7f991a2aff36e34abc938&pid=1-s2.0-S2772503024000288-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Telematics and Informatics Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772503024000288","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The development of digital technology has changed the audience's reading behavior and reading habits, and the difference between digital reading and paper reading has become a research hot spot. However, the academic circle has not reached an agreement on the reading effect of digital reading and paper reading. This study included 37 experimental studies for meta-analysis and analyzed the influence of moderating variables such as audience characteristics, text characteristics, and reading conditions. This study deepens the understanding of the reading effect and provides a reference for improving it. The study shows no significant difference in overall reading comprehension between digital reading and paper reading, and there are differences under moderating variables. The study has revealed that digital reading and paper reading have advantages and disadvantages and complement each other. The publishing industry should develop corresponding knowledge service products based on the characteristics of reading effects to promote the healthy development of the reading industry.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
哪种阅读理解更好?近 20 年纸质阅读与数字阅读效果的荟萃分析
数字技术的发展改变了受众的阅读行为和阅读习惯,数字阅读与纸质阅读的差异成为研究热点。然而,学界对数字阅读与纸质阅读的阅读效果并未达成一致。本研究纳入了 37 项实验研究进行元分析,并分析了受众特征、文本特征和阅读条件等调节变量的影响。本研究加深了对阅读效果的理解,为改善阅读效果提供了参考。研究表明,数字阅读与纸质阅读在总体阅读理解能力上无明显差异,在调节变量下存在差异。研究表明,数字阅读与纸质阅读各有利弊,互为补充。出版业应根据阅读效果的特点开发相应的知识服务产品,促进阅读产业的健康发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
An antenna with second−iteration fractal patch and parallel−plane grounds for UWB/X/Ku/K band applications Mediating role of trust and privacy concerns between web assurance mechanism and purchase intention of online products Enhancing online learning quality: a structural equation modeling analysis of educational technology implementation during the COVID-19 pandemic Advancements in natural language processing: Implications, challenges, and future directions Impact of on-topic and off-topic discussions on member participation and contribution in a common-identity online community
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1