Lexical indicators for Chinese language ecological discourse analysis: Design and testing of a novel framework

IF 1.7 2区 文学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Language Sciences Pub Date : 2024-04-25 DOI:10.1016/j.langsci.2024.101634
Daniele Brombal , Sergio Conti , Pui Yiu Szeto
{"title":"Lexical indicators for Chinese language ecological discourse analysis: Design and testing of a novel framework","authors":"Daniele Brombal ,&nbsp;Sergio Conti ,&nbsp;Pui Yiu Szeto","doi":"10.1016/j.langsci.2024.101634","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This paper introduces the results of an exploratory study, aimed at designing and testing an ecological discourse analysis framework, applicable to texts in Chinese language. Focusing on vocabulary, the study followed an iterative deductive-inductive process. First, a preliminary framework of lexical indicators was identified through literature review, adapted to Chinese language by means of a pilot analysis, and validated based on experts’ judgement. The framework was then tested on a sample of documents relevant to an environmental justice case in China. Results indicate that our Chinese Language Ecological Discourse Analysis (C-LEDA) framework can assist a coherent ecolinguistic characterization of Chinese texts by highlighting lexical patterns that reflect diverse social-ecological values and worldviews. Our work is a meaningful contribution to developing reliable tools for ecolinguistic analysis and lays the ground for further advancements in the field. More specifically, it constitutes a first step to support the development of: (a) multi-criteria annotation schemes for quantitative, corpus-assisted ecological discourse analysis; (b) qualitative and quantitative comparative studies, broadening the scope of analysis to the wider Sinophone context; and (c) co-creative protocols to <em>re-story</em> documents used in environmental planning to address the extractivist bias inherent in such processes.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51592,"journal":{"name":"Language Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Language Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0388000124000238","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper introduces the results of an exploratory study, aimed at designing and testing an ecological discourse analysis framework, applicable to texts in Chinese language. Focusing on vocabulary, the study followed an iterative deductive-inductive process. First, a preliminary framework of lexical indicators was identified through literature review, adapted to Chinese language by means of a pilot analysis, and validated based on experts’ judgement. The framework was then tested on a sample of documents relevant to an environmental justice case in China. Results indicate that our Chinese Language Ecological Discourse Analysis (C-LEDA) framework can assist a coherent ecolinguistic characterization of Chinese texts by highlighting lexical patterns that reflect diverse social-ecological values and worldviews. Our work is a meaningful contribution to developing reliable tools for ecolinguistic analysis and lays the ground for further advancements in the field. More specifically, it constitutes a first step to support the development of: (a) multi-criteria annotation schemes for quantitative, corpus-assisted ecological discourse analysis; (b) qualitative and quantitative comparative studies, broadening the scope of analysis to the wider Sinophone context; and (c) co-creative protocols to re-story documents used in environmental planning to address the extractivist bias inherent in such processes.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
汉语生态话语分析的词汇指标:新框架的设计与测试
本文介绍了一项探索性研究的结果,该研究旨在设计和测试适用于中文文本的生态话语分析框架。该研究以词汇为重点,遵循演绎-归纳的迭代过程。首先,通过文献综述确定了一个初步的词汇指标框架,通过试点分析使其适应中文,并根据专家的判断进行验证。然后,在与中国环境正义案例相关的文件样本中对该框架进行了测试。结果表明,我们的中文生态话语分析(C-LEDA)框架可以通过突出反映不同社会生态价值观和世界观的词汇模式,帮助对中文文本进行连贯的生态语言描述。我们的工作为开发可靠的生态语言学分析工具做出了有意义的贡献,并为该领域的进一步发展奠定了基础。更具体地说,它为支持以下方面的发展迈出了第一步:(a) 用于定量、语料库辅助生态话语分析的多标准注释方案;(b) 定性和定量比较研究,将分析范围扩大到更广泛的中文语境;(c) 共同创作协议,重新讲述环境规划中使用的文件,以解决此类过程中固有的采掘主义偏见。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Language Sciences
Language Sciences Multiple-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
38
期刊介绍: Language Sciences is a forum for debate, conducted so as to be of interest to the widest possible audience, on conceptual and theoretical issues in the various branches of general linguistics. The journal is also concerned with bringing to linguists attention current thinking about language within disciplines other than linguistics itself; relevant contributions from anthropologists, philosophers, psychologists and sociologists, among others, will be warmly received. In addition, the Editor is particularly keen to encourage the submission of essays on topics in the history and philosophy of language studies, and review articles discussing the import of significant recent works on language and linguistics.
期刊最新文献
A study of visual path expressions in Mandarin Chinese from the perspective of motion event typology The etymology of opaque place names based on a cognitive and interdisciplinary method Third-way linguistics: generative and usage-based theories are both right Further semantic change of the derogatory sociomorpheme tái in Chinese gender-related Internet neologisms Science mapping the literature in Applied Linguistics secondary research: navigating knowledge evolution from an epistemic perspective (1970–2022)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1