Views of health care professionals on the implementation of preoperative advance care planning in older patients with head and neck cancer: Q methodology

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING International Journal of Nursing Sciences Pub Date : 2024-04-01 DOI:10.1016/j.ijnss.2024.03.011
Huixian Yang, Ruirui Duan, Yongxia Ding, Jing Xu, Yanzhi Tian
{"title":"Views of health care professionals on the implementation of preoperative advance care planning in older patients with head and neck cancer: Q methodology","authors":"Huixian Yang,&nbsp;Ruirui Duan,&nbsp;Yongxia Ding,&nbsp;Jing Xu,&nbsp;Yanzhi Tian","doi":"10.1016/j.ijnss.2024.03.011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To investigate the views of health care professionals in a head and neck surgical department toward the implementation of advance care planning prior to surgery for older patients with head and neck cancer.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>Q methodology was used to explore and analyze participants’ views by combining quantitative and qualitative methods. Participants were asked to rank 35 Q statements generated via semi-structured interviews and a literature review and to explain the reasons for their ranking in subsequent interviews. The data was then analyzed and used to develop a factor series to illustrate participants’ views.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>This study surveyed 15 health care professionals, including eight doctors and seven nurses. The views of health care professionals toward preoperative implementation of advance care planning discussions were varied and could be categorized into three types: defending the autonomy of patients, patients’ knowledge and the Chinese traditional cultural context hinder the implementation of preoperative advance care planning, and lack of confidence in performing preoperative advance care planning.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Although the health care professionals in the head and neck surgical department in this study recognized the benefits of preoperative discussions regarding advance care planning, patients’ knowledge level, traditional Chinese values, inadequate capacity among health care professionals, and unsound legal policies have caused these professionals to have misgivings about preoperative counseling and discussing advance care planning with patients. Further studies should be conducted, and strategies to overcome barriers to discussions of preoperative advance care planning should be developed.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":37848,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Nursing Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352013224000280/pdfft?md5=c3133ae869e4f20e4454ba374e8386f2&pid=1-s2.0-S2352013224000280-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Nursing Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352013224000280","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To investigate the views of health care professionals in a head and neck surgical department toward the implementation of advance care planning prior to surgery for older patients with head and neck cancer.

Method

Q methodology was used to explore and analyze participants’ views by combining quantitative and qualitative methods. Participants were asked to rank 35 Q statements generated via semi-structured interviews and a literature review and to explain the reasons for their ranking in subsequent interviews. The data was then analyzed and used to develop a factor series to illustrate participants’ views.

Results

This study surveyed 15 health care professionals, including eight doctors and seven nurses. The views of health care professionals toward preoperative implementation of advance care planning discussions were varied and could be categorized into three types: defending the autonomy of patients, patients’ knowledge and the Chinese traditional cultural context hinder the implementation of preoperative advance care planning, and lack of confidence in performing preoperative advance care planning.

Conclusions

Although the health care professionals in the head and neck surgical department in this study recognized the benefits of preoperative discussions regarding advance care planning, patients’ knowledge level, traditional Chinese values, inadequate capacity among health care professionals, and unsound legal policies have caused these professionals to have misgivings about preoperative counseling and discussing advance care planning with patients. Further studies should be conducted, and strategies to overcome barriers to discussions of preoperative advance care planning should be developed.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
医护人员对老年头颈癌患者实施术前预先护理计划的看法:Q 方法
目的调查头颈外科专业医护人员对老年头颈癌患者手术前实施预先护理计划的看法。方法采用Q法,通过定量和定性相结合的方法探索和分析参与者的看法。要求参与者对通过半结构式访谈和文献综述得出的 35 个 Q 语句进行排序,并在随后的访谈中解释排序的原因。然后对数据进行分析,并利用这些数据建立一个因素系列来说明参与者的观点。医护人员对术前实施预先护理计划讨论的看法各不相同,可分为三种类型:捍卫患者的自主权、患者的知识和中国传统文化背景阻碍了术前预先护理计划的实施,以及对实施术前预先护理计划缺乏信心。结论虽然本研究中头颈外科的医护人员认识到术前讨论预先护理计划的益处,但患者的知识水平、中国传统价值观、医护人员能力不足以及不健全的法律政策等因素导致这些医护人员对术前咨询和与患者讨论预先护理计划存在疑虑。应开展进一步的研究,并制定克服术前预先护理计划讨论障碍的策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
2.60%
发文量
408
审稿时长
25 days
期刊介绍: This journal aims to promote excellence in nursing and health care through the dissemination of the latest, evidence-based, peer-reviewed clinical information and original research, providing an international platform for exchanging knowledge, research findings and nursing practice experience. This journal covers a wide range of nursing topics such as advanced nursing practice, bio-psychosocial issues related to health, cultural perspectives, lifestyle change as a component of health promotion, chronic disease, including end-of-life care, family care giving. IJNSS publishes four issues per year in Jan/Apr/Jul/Oct. IJNSS intended readership includes practicing nurses in all spheres and at all levels who are committed to advancing practice and professional development on the basis of new knowledge and evidence; managers and senior members of the nursing; nurse educators and nursing students etc. IJNSS seeks to enrich insight into clinical need and the implications for nursing intervention and models of service delivery. Contributions are welcomed from other health professions on issues that have a direct impact on nursing practice.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Contents Web-based cognitive interventions on subjective cognitive impairment in cancer survivors: A systemic review A concept analysis of vicarious resilience in mental health nursing Evaluating the feasibility and preliminary effects of an online compassion training program for nursing students: A pilot randomized controlled trial
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1