The quality of dying and death of patients with cancer from Shanghai in China from the perspective of healthcare providers: A cross-sectional study

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING International Journal of Nursing Sciences Pub Date : 2024-04-01 DOI:10.1016/j.ijnss.2024.03.010
Jiawei Min , Peihao Liu , Kaifeng Xiao , Zhe Huang , Xiaobin Lai
{"title":"The quality of dying and death of patients with cancer from Shanghai in China from the perspective of healthcare providers: A cross-sectional study","authors":"Jiawei Min ,&nbsp;Peihao Liu ,&nbsp;Kaifeng Xiao ,&nbsp;Zhe Huang ,&nbsp;Xiaobin Lai","doi":"10.1016/j.ijnss.2024.03.010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To evaluate the quality of dying and death among deceased patients with cancer in Shanghai from the perspective of healthcare providers.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This cross-sectional study was conducted in Shanghai from April to July 2023. A convenience sample of 261 healthcare providers working at eight healthcare institutions participated. Each participant was asked to evaluate the quality of dying and death of one deceased patient who had been cared for recently using the Good Death Scale for patients in China (GDS-PCN). The scale included family companionship (eight items), dying with peace (six items), professional care (six items), preparation &amp; no regrets (five items), maintaining dignity (four items), keeping autonomy (four items), and physical wellbeing (three items) seven dimensions, 36 items.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The total GDS-PCN score was 144.11 ± 17.86. The professional care dimension scored the highest (4.21 ± 0.58), whereas the preparation and no regret dimension scored the lowest (3.75 ± 0.70). Significant differences in the GDS-PCN scores were based on the healthcare institution grade, ward type, hospitalization duration, communication about the condition, treatment, and death-related topics with the healthcare provider, and decision-making style (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.05). The quality of dying and death of the deceased patients was higher among those who received care in community health service centers and hospice wards, those who had been hospitalized for more than 15 days, those who had discussed their personal conditions, treatment, and death-related topics with healthcare providers to a greater extent; and those who were involved in decision-making (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.05).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The overall quality of dying and death among cancer patients in Shanghai is moderate to high, but the quality of dying and death in the preparation and no regret dimension and the keeping autonomy dimension still have room for improvement. Increased utilization of hospice care and better communication between patients and healthcare providers may enhance decedents’ quality of dying and death. Future research on this topic is required from different perspectives and on a broader scale in the mainland of China.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":37848,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Nursing Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352013224000279/pdfft?md5=d3e100d212697b29bcd4d77395bd354b&pid=1-s2.0-S2352013224000279-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Nursing Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352013224000279","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To evaluate the quality of dying and death among deceased patients with cancer in Shanghai from the perspective of healthcare providers.

Methods

This cross-sectional study was conducted in Shanghai from April to July 2023. A convenience sample of 261 healthcare providers working at eight healthcare institutions participated. Each participant was asked to evaluate the quality of dying and death of one deceased patient who had been cared for recently using the Good Death Scale for patients in China (GDS-PCN). The scale included family companionship (eight items), dying with peace (six items), professional care (six items), preparation & no regrets (five items), maintaining dignity (four items), keeping autonomy (four items), and physical wellbeing (three items) seven dimensions, 36 items.

Results

The total GDS-PCN score was 144.11 ± 17.86. The professional care dimension scored the highest (4.21 ± 0.58), whereas the preparation and no regret dimension scored the lowest (3.75 ± 0.70). Significant differences in the GDS-PCN scores were based on the healthcare institution grade, ward type, hospitalization duration, communication about the condition, treatment, and death-related topics with the healthcare provider, and decision-making style (P < 0.05). The quality of dying and death of the deceased patients was higher among those who received care in community health service centers and hospice wards, those who had been hospitalized for more than 15 days, those who had discussed their personal conditions, treatment, and death-related topics with healthcare providers to a greater extent; and those who were involved in decision-making (P < 0.05).

Conclusion

The overall quality of dying and death among cancer patients in Shanghai is moderate to high, but the quality of dying and death in the preparation and no regret dimension and the keeping autonomy dimension still have room for improvement. Increased utilization of hospice care and better communication between patients and healthcare providers may enhance decedents’ quality of dying and death. Future research on this topic is required from different perspectives and on a broader scale in the mainland of China.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从医疗服务提供者的角度看中国上海癌症患者的死亡质量:横断面研究
方法 本横断面研究于 2023 年 4 月至 7 月在上海进行。共有 261 名在 8 家医疗机构工作的医疗服务提供者参加了此次研究。每位参与者都被要求使用中国患者良好死亡量表(GDS-PCN)对最近护理过的一名死亡患者的临终和死亡质量进行评估。该量表包括家人陪伴(8个项目)、安详离世(6个项目)、专业护理(6个项目)、准备与无悔(5个项目)、维护尊严(4个项目)、保持自主(4个项目)和身体健康(3个项目)七个维度,共36个项目。专业护理维度得分最高(4.21 ± 0.58),而准备和无悔维度得分最低(3.75 ± 0.70)。医疗机构级别、病房类型、住院时间、与医疗服务提供者就病情、治疗和死亡相关话题的沟通以及决策方式在 GDS-PCN 评分上存在显著差异(P < 0.05)。在社区卫生服务中心和临终关怀病房接受治疗者、住院时间超过 15 天者、与医疗服务提供者就个人病情、治疗和死亡相关话题进行过更多讨论者以及参与决策者的死亡质量更高(P < 0.05)。提高临终关怀的使用率以及改善患者与医疗服务提供者之间的沟通,可以提高死者的临终质量。未来需要在中国大陆从不同角度和更大范围对这一主题进行研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
2.60%
发文量
408
审稿时长
25 days
期刊介绍: This journal aims to promote excellence in nursing and health care through the dissemination of the latest, evidence-based, peer-reviewed clinical information and original research, providing an international platform for exchanging knowledge, research findings and nursing practice experience. This journal covers a wide range of nursing topics such as advanced nursing practice, bio-psychosocial issues related to health, cultural perspectives, lifestyle change as a component of health promotion, chronic disease, including end-of-life care, family care giving. IJNSS publishes four issues per year in Jan/Apr/Jul/Oct. IJNSS intended readership includes practicing nurses in all spheres and at all levels who are committed to advancing practice and professional development on the basis of new knowledge and evidence; managers and senior members of the nursing; nurse educators and nursing students etc. IJNSS seeks to enrich insight into clinical need and the implications for nursing intervention and models of service delivery. Contributions are welcomed from other health professions on issues that have a direct impact on nursing practice.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Contents Scanning resources to build an international nursing knowledge network Effectiveness of nurse-led heart failure clinic: A systematic review Reliability and validity of the Italian Version of the Chase Nurse Manager Competencies Scale
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1