Efficacy of topiramate in treating obsessive compulsive disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Pietro Carmellini, Alessandro Cuomo, Andrea Fagiolini
{"title":"Efficacy of topiramate in treating obsessive compulsive disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"Pietro Carmellini,&nbsp;Alessandro Cuomo,&nbsp;Andrea Fagiolini","doi":"10.1016/j.jadr.2024.100787","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to synthesize the evidence of efficacy and tolerability of adjunctive topiramate treatment for patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A systematic search was conducted on MEDLINE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and OpenGrey to identify randomized controlled trials assigning participants with OCD to pharmacological intervention with topiramate. Study inclusion and data extraction were undertaken by two reviewers independently. The primary outcome was the Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale (Y-BOCS) scale score, as a continuous variable within-subject OCD illness severity before and after treatment. The weighted mean difference (WMD) with 95 % confidence interval was calculated between the topiramate group and the control group.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Five studies were selected for inclusion in the systematic review, 4 of which were also included in the quantitative synthesis of data. The WMD in the Y-BOCS score between topiramate and placebo subjects was -0.49 (-2.28, 1.30) (<em>p</em> = 0.00); The results show a trend towards an effect of topiramate, but the estimate was not significant. Subgroup analysis revealed a significant effect at 12 weeks but not at 16 weeks (<em>p</em> = 0.00).</p></div><div><h3>Limitations</h3><p>Low quality of the studies included and small sample size.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>There is a small positive signal for an anti-obsessive/compulsive effect in OCD patients which should encourage further research with larger, randomized, and placebo-controlled trials to assess topiramate's potential role in OCD treatment comprehensively.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":52768,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Affective Disorders Reports","volume":"17 ","pages":"Article 100787"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666915324000738/pdfft?md5=e8de762d28263aaf508ffadb41977e90&pid=1-s2.0-S2666915324000738-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Affective Disorders Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666915324000738","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Psychology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to synthesize the evidence of efficacy and tolerability of adjunctive topiramate treatment for patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder.

Methods

A systematic search was conducted on MEDLINE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and OpenGrey to identify randomized controlled trials assigning participants with OCD to pharmacological intervention with topiramate. Study inclusion and data extraction were undertaken by two reviewers independently. The primary outcome was the Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale (Y-BOCS) scale score, as a continuous variable within-subject OCD illness severity before and after treatment. The weighted mean difference (WMD) with 95 % confidence interval was calculated between the topiramate group and the control group.

Results

Five studies were selected for inclusion in the systematic review, 4 of which were also included in the quantitative synthesis of data. The WMD in the Y-BOCS score between topiramate and placebo subjects was -0.49 (-2.28, 1.30) (p = 0.00); The results show a trend towards an effect of topiramate, but the estimate was not significant. Subgroup analysis revealed a significant effect at 12 weeks but not at 16 weeks (p = 0.00).

Limitations

Low quality of the studies included and small sample size.

Conclusion

There is a small positive signal for an anti-obsessive/compulsive effect in OCD patients which should encourage further research with larger, randomized, and placebo-controlled trials to assess topiramate's potential role in OCD treatment comprehensively.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
托吡酯治疗强迫症的疗效:系统回顾和荟萃分析
背景本系统综述和荟萃分析旨在总结托吡酯辅助治疗强迫症患者的疗效和耐受性证据。方法在MEDLINE、Cochrane对照试验中央注册中心和OpenGrey上进行了系统检索,以确定将强迫症患者分配给托吡酯药物干预的随机对照试验。研究的纳入和数据提取由两名审稿人独立完成。主要研究结果是耶鲁-布朗强迫症量表(Y-BOCS)评分,作为治疗前后强迫症病情严重程度的连续变量。计算托吡酯组与对照组之间的加权平均差(WMD)及 95% 的置信区间。托吡酯与安慰剂受试者的Y-BOCS评分的WMD为-0.49 (-2.28, 1.30) (p = 0.00);结果显示托吡酯有影响的趋势,但估计值不显著。局限性纳入的研究质量不高,样本量较小。结论在强迫症患者中存在抗强迫症/强迫症效果的小幅阳性信号,这应鼓励进一步开展更大规模的随机安慰剂对照试验研究,以全面评估托吡酯在强迫症治疗中的潜在作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Affective Disorders Reports
Journal of Affective Disorders Reports Psychology-Clinical Psychology
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
137
审稿时长
134 days
期刊最新文献
Mature brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) levels in serum correlate with symptom severity in post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) Disentangling the relationships of health-related quality of life, depressive symptoms, disability and social support after stroke: A network analysis Implementing group therapy for posttraumatic stress disorder within a primary care setting: A pilot study Developing and validating the Sierra Leone perinatal psychological distress scale through an emic-etic approach Examining concurrent and longitudinal associations between quality of interpersonal relations and depressive symptoms among young adults in India
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1