Examining the linkage between managerial ties and firm performance: The mediating role of marketing capabilities and moderation role of industry - A meta-analytic approach

IF 7.8 1区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS Industrial Marketing Management Pub Date : 2024-04-25 DOI:10.1016/j.indmarman.2024.04.010
Abhishek Shukla , Jyoti Varshney , Alok Raj
{"title":"Examining the linkage between managerial ties and firm performance: The mediating role of marketing capabilities and moderation role of industry - A meta-analytic approach","authors":"Abhishek Shukla ,&nbsp;Jyoti Varshney ,&nbsp;Alok Raj","doi":"10.1016/j.indmarman.2024.04.010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This paper investigates the relationship between managerial ties (business and political ties) and firm performance (operational performance and innovation). We consider marketing capabilities as a mediating variable to analyze how it mediates the relationship between managerial ties and firm performance. Previous studies have often taken a piecemeal approach to examining the ties-performance linkage and have been limited by sample size. We use a meta-analytic structural equation modeling (meta-SEM) approach to analyze the proposed relationship. We consider 281 studies assessing 943,331 effect sizes to analyze the results. To investigate the relationship, we consider social exchange and resource-based theory. The results suggest that business (political) ties are positively (negatively) associated with operational performance, while both business and political ties are positively associated with innovation. Further, our result suggests that (a) approximately 14.2% of the effect of business ties on innovation is mediated by marketing capabilities and (b) industry type moderates the relationship between ties and performance. This study helps managers leverage managerial ties to improve firm performance and further suggests a proper mechanism through which firms can improve performance.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51345,"journal":{"name":"Industrial Marketing Management","volume":"119 ","pages":"Pages 122-134"},"PeriodicalIF":7.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Industrial Marketing Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S001985012400066X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper investigates the relationship between managerial ties (business and political ties) and firm performance (operational performance and innovation). We consider marketing capabilities as a mediating variable to analyze how it mediates the relationship between managerial ties and firm performance. Previous studies have often taken a piecemeal approach to examining the ties-performance linkage and have been limited by sample size. We use a meta-analytic structural equation modeling (meta-SEM) approach to analyze the proposed relationship. We consider 281 studies assessing 943,331 effect sizes to analyze the results. To investigate the relationship, we consider social exchange and resource-based theory. The results suggest that business (political) ties are positively (negatively) associated with operational performance, while both business and political ties are positively associated with innovation. Further, our result suggests that (a) approximately 14.2% of the effect of business ties on innovation is mediated by marketing capabilities and (b) industry type moderates the relationship between ties and performance. This study helps managers leverage managerial ties to improve firm performance and further suggests a proper mechanism through which firms can improve performance.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
研究管理关系与公司业绩之间的联系:营销能力的中介作用和行业的调节作用--一种元分析方法
本文研究了管理关系(商业关系和政治关系)与企业绩效(运营绩效和创新)之间的关系。我们将营销能力视为中介变量,分析营销能力如何中介管理关系与企业绩效之间的关系。以往的研究通常采用零敲碎打的方法来研究纽带与绩效之间的联系,并且受到样本量的限制。我们采用元分析结构方程模型(meta-SEM)方法来分析这种关系。我们考虑了 281 项研究,评估了 943,331 个效应大小来分析结果。为了研究这种关系,我们考虑了社会交换和基于资源的理论。结果表明,商业(政治)关系与运营绩效正(负)相关,而商业和政治关系均与创新正相关。此外,我们的研究结果表明:(a) 商业联系对创新的影响约有 14.2% 是由营销能力中介的;(b) 行业类型调节了联系与绩效之间的关系。这项研究有助于管理者利用管理关系提高企业绩效,并进一步提出了企业提高绩效的适当机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
17.30
自引率
20.40%
发文量
255
期刊介绍: Industrial Marketing Management delivers theoretical, empirical, and case-based research tailored to the requirements of marketing scholars and practitioners engaged in industrial and business-to-business markets. With an editorial review board comprising prominent international scholars and practitioners, the journal ensures a harmonious blend of theory and practical applications in all articles. Scholars from North America, Europe, Australia/New Zealand, Asia, and various global regions contribute the latest findings to enhance the effectiveness and efficiency of industrial markets. This holistic approach keeps readers informed with the most timely data and contemporary insights essential for informed marketing decisions and strategies in global industrial and business-to-business markets.
期刊最新文献
Sustainable entrepreneurship: How do contextual factors play a role? How marketing and sales use digital tools for innovation ideation The value of congruence in social exchanges: A dyadic trust perspective on servitization The role of innovation capabilities upgradation and digitalization in value co-creation and PSS innovation performance Collaborative problemistic search capability and digital innovation: The moderating effects of IT capability and legal development
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1