Sepsis death risk factor score based on systemic inflammatory response syndrome, quick sequential organ failure assessment, and comorbidities

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q2 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Medicina Intensiva Pub Date : 2024-04-26 DOI:10.1016/j.medin.2024.02.010
Vinicius Nakad Orsatti, Victoria Stadler Tasca Ribeiro, Carolina de Oliveira Montenegro, Clarice Juski Costa, Eduardo Albanske Raboni, Eduardo Ramos Sampaio, Fernando Michielin, Juliano Gasparetto, João Paulo Telles, Felipe Francisco Tuon
{"title":"Sepsis death risk factor score based on systemic inflammatory response syndrome, quick sequential organ failure assessment, and comorbidities","authors":"Vinicius Nakad Orsatti,&nbsp;Victoria Stadler Tasca Ribeiro,&nbsp;Carolina de Oliveira Montenegro,&nbsp;Clarice Juski Costa,&nbsp;Eduardo Albanske Raboni,&nbsp;Eduardo Ramos Sampaio,&nbsp;Fernando Michielin,&nbsp;Juliano Gasparetto,&nbsp;João Paulo Telles,&nbsp;Felipe Francisco Tuon","doi":"10.1016/j.medin.2024.02.010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>In this study, we aimed to evaluate the death risk factors of patients included in the sepsis protocol bundle, using clinical data from qSOFA, SIRS, and comorbidities, as well as development of a mortality risk score.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>This retrospective cohort study was conducted between 2016 and 2021.</p></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><p>Two university hospitals in Brazil.</p></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><p>Patients with sepsis.</p></div><div><h3>Interventions</h3><p>Several clinical and laboratory data were collected focused on SIRS, qSOFA, and comorbidities.</p></div><div><h3>Main variable of interest</h3><p>In-hospital mortality was the primary outcome variable. A mortality risk score was developed after logistic regression analysis.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 1,808 patients were included with a death rate of 36%. Ten variables remained independent factors related to death in multivariate analysis: temperature ≥38 °C (odds ratio [OR] = 0.65), previous sepsis (OR = 1.42), qSOFA ≥ 2 (OR = 1.43), leukocytes &gt;12,000 or &lt;4,000 cells/mm<sup>3</sup> (OR = 1.61), encephalic vascular accident (OR = 1.88), age &gt;60 years (OR = 1.93), cancer (OR = 2.2), length of hospital stay before sepsis &gt;7 days (OR = 2.22,), dialysis (OR = 2.51), and cirrhosis (OR = 3.97). Considering the equation of the binary regression logistic analysis, the score presented an area under curve of 0.668, is not a potential model for death prediction.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Several risk factors are independently associated with mortality, allowing the development of a prediction score based on qSOFA, SIRS, and comorbidities data, however, the performance of this score is low.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49268,"journal":{"name":"Medicina Intensiva","volume":"48 5","pages":"Pages 263-271"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicina Intensiva","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0210569124000731","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

In this study, we aimed to evaluate the death risk factors of patients included in the sepsis protocol bundle, using clinical data from qSOFA, SIRS, and comorbidities, as well as development of a mortality risk score.

Design

This retrospective cohort study was conducted between 2016 and 2021.

Setting

Two university hospitals in Brazil.

Participants

Patients with sepsis.

Interventions

Several clinical and laboratory data were collected focused on SIRS, qSOFA, and comorbidities.

Main variable of interest

In-hospital mortality was the primary outcome variable. A mortality risk score was developed after logistic regression analysis.

Results

A total of 1,808 patients were included with a death rate of 36%. Ten variables remained independent factors related to death in multivariate analysis: temperature ≥38 °C (odds ratio [OR] = 0.65), previous sepsis (OR = 1.42), qSOFA ≥ 2 (OR = 1.43), leukocytes >12,000 or <4,000 cells/mm3 (OR = 1.61), encephalic vascular accident (OR = 1.88), age >60 years (OR = 1.93), cancer (OR = 2.2), length of hospital stay before sepsis >7 days (OR = 2.22,), dialysis (OR = 2.51), and cirrhosis (OR = 3.97). Considering the equation of the binary regression logistic analysis, the score presented an area under curve of 0.668, is not a potential model for death prediction.

Conclusions

Several risk factors are independently associated with mortality, allowing the development of a prediction score based on qSOFA, SIRS, and comorbidities data, however, the performance of this score is low.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于全身炎症反应综合征、快速序贯器官衰竭评估和合并症的脓毒症死亡风险因素评分
目标在这项研究中,我们旨在利用 qSOFA、SIRS 和合并症的临床数据,评估脓毒症方案捆绑包中患者的死亡风险因素,并制定死亡风险评分。主要关注变量院内死亡率是主要结局变量。结果共纳入 1,808 名患者,死亡率为 36%。在多变量分析中,有十个变量仍然是与死亡相关的独立因素:体温≥38 °C(比值比 [OR] = 0.65)、既往败血症(OR = 1.42)、qSOFA ≥ 2(OR = 1.43)、白细胞>12,000 或 <4,000个/mm3(OR = 1.61)、脑血管意外(OR=1.88)、年龄>60岁(OR=1.93)、癌症(OR=2.2)、败血症前住院时间>7天(OR=2.22)、透析(OR=2.51)和肝硬化(OR=3.97)。考虑到二元回归逻辑分析的方程,该评分的曲线下面积为 0.668,不是一个潜在的死亡预测模型。结论多个风险因素与死亡率独立相关,因此可以根据 qSOFA、SIRS 和合并症数据制定预测评分,但该评分的性能较低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Medicina Intensiva
Medicina Intensiva CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE-
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
20.00%
发文量
146
审稿时长
33 days
期刊介绍: Medicina Intensiva is the journal of the Spanish Society of Intensive Care Medicine and Coronary Units (SEMICYUC) and of Pan American and Iberian Federation of Societies of Intensive and Critical Care Medicine. Medicina Intensiva has become the reference publication in Spanish in its field. The journal mainly publishes Original Articles, Reviews, Clinical Notes, Consensus Documents, Images, and other information relevant to the specialty. All works go through a rigorous selection process. The journal accepts submissions of articles in English and in Spanish languages. The journal follows the publication requirements of the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) and the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
期刊最新文献
Perforación esofágica secundaria a una acalasia Aneurisma de aorta abdominal complicado con fístula aortocava Fragilidad, prevalencia en nuestras unidades de cuidados intensivos y características diferenciales de los pacientes frágiles Seguridad del paciente, ¿qué aportan la simulación clínica y la innovación docente? Análisis de los errores de medicación en Cuidados Intensivos Neonatales: una revisión sistemática
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1