Social inequality in admission chances for prestigious higher education programs in Germany: do application patterns matter?

IF 3.1 1区 社会学 Q1 SOCIOLOGY European Sociological Review Pub Date : 2024-04-25 DOI:10.1093/esr/jcae024
C. Finger, Heike Solga, Benjamin Elbers
{"title":"Social inequality in admission chances for prestigious higher education programs in Germany: do application patterns matter?","authors":"C. Finger, Heike Solga, Benjamin Elbers","doi":"10.1093/esr/jcae024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Research has shown that admission to prestigious higher education programs varies by students' socio-economic status (SES). Access to these programs is characterized by high competition and often rather complex admission procedures. Thus, access may depend not only on students’ performance and decisions to apply but also on their application patterns: Where and how they apply, which may vary by social background due to differences in educational achievement, aspirations, and constraints. Using applications to highly prestigious medical programs in Germany, we examine whether admission chances are socially selective even among the positively selected group of applicants, and whether this is due to SES differences in application patterns or performance. Based on complete application register data, we identify application patterns through cluster analysis. We then used the resulting cluster model to predict cluster membership in the 2018 applicant cohort, for which we collected survey data with information on applicants’ SES, preferences, and motivations. We find that application patterns vary primarily by applicants’ performance (grades and test scores) and SES-specific geographic constraints. However, our multivariate analyses on admission chances show that application patterns do not mediate SES differences in admission chances. Instead, these differences are entirely due to SES differences in applicants’ performance.","PeriodicalId":48237,"journal":{"name":"European Sociological Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Sociological Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcae024","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Research has shown that admission to prestigious higher education programs varies by students' socio-economic status (SES). Access to these programs is characterized by high competition and often rather complex admission procedures. Thus, access may depend not only on students’ performance and decisions to apply but also on their application patterns: Where and how they apply, which may vary by social background due to differences in educational achievement, aspirations, and constraints. Using applications to highly prestigious medical programs in Germany, we examine whether admission chances are socially selective even among the positively selected group of applicants, and whether this is due to SES differences in application patterns or performance. Based on complete application register data, we identify application patterns through cluster analysis. We then used the resulting cluster model to predict cluster membership in the 2018 applicant cohort, for which we collected survey data with information on applicants’ SES, preferences, and motivations. We find that application patterns vary primarily by applicants’ performance (grades and test scores) and SES-specific geographic constraints. However, our multivariate analyses on admission chances show that application patterns do not mediate SES differences in admission chances. Instead, these differences are entirely due to SES differences in applicants’ performance.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
德国高等教育名校录取机会的社会不平等:申请模式是否重要?
研究表明,学生的社会经济地位(SES)不同,高等教育名校的录取情况也不同。这些课程的入学竞争激烈,入学程序往往相当复杂。因此,入学机会可能不仅取决于学生的成绩和申请决定,还取决于他们的申请模式:由于教育成就、抱负和限制因素的不同,他们申请的地点和方式也可能因社会背景而异。我们利用德国高声望医学专业的申请情况,研究了即使在被积极选拔的申请者群体中,录取机会是否也具有社会选择性,以及这是否是由于申请模式或成绩方面的社会经济背景差异造成的。基于完整的申请登记数据,我们通过聚类分析确定了申请模式。然后,我们使用由此产生的聚类模型来预测 2018 年申请者群体中的聚类成员,我们为此收集了包含申请者社会经济地位、偏好和动机信息的调查数据。我们发现,申请模式主要因申请人的表现(成绩和考试分数)和特定社会经济地位的地理限制而异。然而,我们对录取机会的多变量分析表明,申请模式并不能调节社会经济地位对录取机会的影响。相反,这些差异完全是由申请者成绩的社会经济地位差异造成的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
9.40%
发文量
56
期刊介绍: European Sociological Review contains articles in all fields of sociology ranging in length from short research notes up to major reports.
期刊最新文献
School composition and academic decisions Family structure and policy contexts: implications for tertiary education attainment in 25 European countries Stratifying cities: the effect of outdoor recreation areas on children’s well-being Steeper at the top: cognitive ability and earnings in Finland and Norway Social inequality in admission chances for prestigious higher education programs in Germany: do application patterns matter?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1