Devolution and declaratory judgments: the Counsel General’s legal challenge to the UK Internal Market Act 2020

Gareth Evans
{"title":"Devolution and declaratory judgments: the Counsel General’s legal challenge to the UK Internal Market Act 2020","authors":"Gareth Evans","doi":"10.53386/nilq.v75i1.1082","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This commentary will focus on the Counsel General’s legal challenge to the United Kingdom Internal Market Act 2020 (UKIMA). While the application for an advisory declaration in this case was refused by both the Divisional Court and Court of Appeal, this commentary argues that the substance of the application, and accompanying decision of the court, offer three points of constitutional significance regarding the Welsh devolution settlement: (i) the decision clarifies the position on the use of declaratory judgments in reference to premature questions on legislative competence; (ii) the application sets out the substance of the Welsh Government’s ongoing concern regarding the content and operation of UKIMA, and its potential impact upon the Senedd’s legislative competence; (iii) the application by a devolved government for judicial review of UK Parliamentary legislation marks a significant moment in the relationship between the Welsh and UK Governments.","PeriodicalId":509896,"journal":{"name":"Northern Ireland Legal Quarterly","volume":"10 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Northern Ireland Legal Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53386/nilq.v75i1.1082","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This commentary will focus on the Counsel General’s legal challenge to the United Kingdom Internal Market Act 2020 (UKIMA). While the application for an advisory declaration in this case was refused by both the Divisional Court and Court of Appeal, this commentary argues that the substance of the application, and accompanying decision of the court, offer three points of constitutional significance regarding the Welsh devolution settlement: (i) the decision clarifies the position on the use of declaratory judgments in reference to premature questions on legislative competence; (ii) the application sets out the substance of the Welsh Government’s ongoing concern regarding the content and operation of UKIMA, and its potential impact upon the Senedd’s legislative competence; (iii) the application by a devolved government for judicial review of UK Parliamentary legislation marks a significant moment in the relationship between the Welsh and UK Governments.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
权力下放与宣告性判决:总法律顾问对《2020 年英国内部市场法》的法律挑战
本评论将重点关注总法律顾问对《2020 年英国内部市场法》(UKIMA)提出的法律质疑。虽然此案中的咨询性声明申请被分区法院和上诉法院驳回,但本评论认为,申请的实质内容以及法院的相应裁决对威尔士权力移交解决方案具有三点宪法意义:(i) 该裁决澄清了在涉及立法权限的不成熟问题时使用宣告性判决的立场;(ii) 该申请阐明了威尔士政府对英国国际海事法院的内容和运作的持续关注的实质,以及其对参议院立法权限的潜在影响;(iii) 权力移交政府申请对英国议会立法进行司法审查标志着威尔士政府与英国政府之间关系的一个重要时刻。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Northern Ireland Executive: politics, law and a rethink of judicial intervention Fettering scrutiny on executive discretionary powers? Developments in the judicial reviewability of ministerial non-statutory guidance Inheriting the royals: royal chartered bodies in Ireland after 1922 The Union in court, Part 3: In Re Allister and Peeples’ Applications for Judicial Review [2023] UKSC 5 A continuing nuisance: Jalla v Shell International Trading and Shipping Company Ltd [2023] UKSC 16
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1