A safe space in a strange place: A case study of the safety mechanisms of CrossFit culture

IF 3.9 1区 社会学 Q2 MANAGEMENT Gender Work and Organization Pub Date : 2024-04-25 DOI:10.1111/gwao.13134
Thomas Burø, Jannick Friis Christensen, Linea Munk Petersen
{"title":"A safe space in a strange place: A case study of the safety mechanisms of CrossFit culture","authors":"Thomas Burø,&nbsp;Jannick Friis Christensen,&nbsp;Linea Munk Petersen","doi":"10.1111/gwao.13134","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Based on a 1-year ethnographic case study of a Copenhagen-based CrossFit gym we demonstrate how an organized training place is made physically, psychologically, and socially safe. This we show empirically by analyzing how the local multi-sited CrossFit gym ‘CHALK’ maintains its safe space through three organizing mechanisms: (1) coach-led learning progression and practice of the physical craft of CrossFit exercise, intended to prevent injury; (2) a dynamic relation between ‘Rx’ and ’scaling’, that is, setting universal standards for an exercise (Rx) and adjusting to individual levels of competence (scaling), actively preventing the high intensity workout from becoming high risk and from setting idealized norms that only few can live up to, but feel compelled to pursue nonetheless; (3) an egalitarian culture whose practice enables members to participate regardless of age, gender, ethnicity, socio-economic class, sexual orientation, and prior exercise experience. Our ethnomethodological approach further allows us to discuss how certain signifiers of difference are recognized but either do not become salient or do not matter in respect to the functional training. Rather, we find and argue for the possibility to engage in ‘tomboy-ish behavior’ that challenges gender and other identity performances in CHALK. In identifying necessary and sufficient conditions for establishing safe space, the article contributes to extant literature, showing how safe space can emerge as an effect of everyday practice, in contrast to being intentional and declared.</p>","PeriodicalId":48128,"journal":{"name":"Gender Work and Organization","volume":"32 1","pages":"75-99"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/gwao.13134","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gender Work and Organization","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/gwao.13134","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Based on a 1-year ethnographic case study of a Copenhagen-based CrossFit gym we demonstrate how an organized training place is made physically, psychologically, and socially safe. This we show empirically by analyzing how the local multi-sited CrossFit gym ‘CHALK’ maintains its safe space through three organizing mechanisms: (1) coach-led learning progression and practice of the physical craft of CrossFit exercise, intended to prevent injury; (2) a dynamic relation between ‘Rx’ and ’scaling’, that is, setting universal standards for an exercise (Rx) and adjusting to individual levels of competence (scaling), actively preventing the high intensity workout from becoming high risk and from setting idealized norms that only few can live up to, but feel compelled to pursue nonetheless; (3) an egalitarian culture whose practice enables members to participate regardless of age, gender, ethnicity, socio-economic class, sexual orientation, and prior exercise experience. Our ethnomethodological approach further allows us to discuss how certain signifiers of difference are recognized but either do not become salient or do not matter in respect to the functional training. Rather, we find and argue for the possibility to engage in ‘tomboy-ish behavior’ that challenges gender and other identity performances in CHALK. In identifying necessary and sufficient conditions for establishing safe space, the article contributes to extant literature, showing how safe space can emerge as an effect of everyday practice, in contrast to being intentional and declared.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
陌生地方的安全空间:CrossFit 文化安全机制案例研究
基于对哥本哈根一家 CrossFit 健身房为期一年的人种学案例研究,我们展示了一个有组织的训练场所是如何在生理、心理和社会方面确保安全的。我们通过分析当地多地点 CrossFit 健身房 "CHALK "如何通过三种组织机制来维护其安全空间,以实证的方式展示了这一点:(1)由教练指导的 CrossFit 运动的体能学习和练习,目的是防止受伤;(2) "Rx "和 "scaling "之间的动态关系,即为一项运动设定普遍标准(Rx),并根据个人能力水平进行调整(scaling),积极防止高强度锻炼成为高风险运动,并防止设定只有少数人才能达到、但却不得不追求的理想化标准;(3) 平等主义文化,其实践使成员能够不分年龄、性别、种族、社会经济阶层、性取向和以往的锻炼经验都能参与其中。我们的人种学方法使我们能够进一步讨论某些差异符号是如何被认识到的,但在功能训练中,这些差异符号要么并不突出,要么并不重要。相反,我们发现并论证了参与 "假小子行为 "的可能性,这种行为挑战了 CHALK 中的性别和其他身份表现。通过确定建立安全空间的必要条件和充分条件,文章为现有文献做出了贡献,展示了安全空间是如何作为日常实践的一种效果而出现的,而不是有意为之和公开宣布的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.50
自引率
13.80%
发文量
139
期刊介绍: Gender, Work & Organization is a bimonthly peer-reviewed academic journal. The journal was established in 1994 and is published by John Wiley & Sons. It covers research on the role of gender on the workfloor. In addition to the regular issues, the journal publishes several special issues per year and has new section, Feminist Frontiers,dedicated to contemporary conversations and topics in feminism.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Issue Information Issue Information Diversity: A key idea for business and society. By Mustafa F. Özbilgin, Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge. 2024. pp. 156. £35.99 (pbk). ISBN: 9780367423605 Agile work and gender gap in Italy. An empirical sociological study on downsides and future scenarios
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1