Improved adenoma detection rate using a novel colonoscopic distal attachment: a multicenter randomized controlled trial.

Rui Guo, Jingzhai Wang, L. Min, Ningning Dong, Li Zhang, Ruyun Song, Yang Zhang, Qian Zhang, Huihong Zhai, Peng Li, Shutian Zhang
{"title":"Improved adenoma detection rate using a novel colonoscopic distal attachment: a multicenter randomized controlled trial.","authors":"Rui Guo, Jingzhai Wang, L. Min, Ningning Dong, Li Zhang, Ruyun Song, Yang Zhang, Qian Zhang, Huihong Zhai, Peng Li, Shutian Zhang","doi":"10.14309/ajg.0000000000002829","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVE\nTo evaluate the effect of Embrella, a novel-designed colonoscopic distal attachment, on adenoma detection rate (ADR) and adenoma per colonoscopy (APC), compared with standard colonoscopy in routine practice.\n\n\nMETHODS\nAll consecutive patients who underwent routine colonoscopic examinations at three endoscopy centers in China were enrolled. Participants were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to the Embrella-assisted colonoscopy (EAC) or standard colonoscopy (SC) groups. ADR, APC, inspection time, pain scores, and adverse events were recorded.\n\n\nRESULTS\nOverall, 1179 patients were randomized into the EAC (n = 593) and SC groups (n = 586). EAC increased the overall ADR from 24.6% to 34.2% (P < .001) and improved APC from 0.44 to 0.64 (P = .002). Subgroup analyses indicated that EAC significantly improved ADR for adenomas < 10 mm (13.8% vs. 8.5%, P = .004 for 5-9 mm and 27.0% vs. 17.2%, P < .001 for < 5 mm), non-pedunculated adenomas (26.6% vs. 18.8%, P < .001), and adenomas in the transverse (10.8% vs. 6.1%, P = .004) and left colon (21.6% vs. 13.7%, P < .001). APC in the subgroup analyses was consistent with ADR. The mean inspection time was shorter with EAC (6.52 min vs. 6.68 min, P = .046), with no significant impact on patients' pain scores (P = .377). Moreover, no EAC-related adverse events occurred.\n\n\nCONCLUSION\nEAC significantly increased ADR and APC compared with SC, particularly for adenomas < 10 mm, non-pedunculated adenomas, and adenomas in the transverse and left colon.","PeriodicalId":507623,"journal":{"name":"The American Journal of Gastroenterology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The American Journal of Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14309/ajg.0000000000002829","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

OBJECTIVE To evaluate the effect of Embrella, a novel-designed colonoscopic distal attachment, on adenoma detection rate (ADR) and adenoma per colonoscopy (APC), compared with standard colonoscopy in routine practice. METHODS All consecutive patients who underwent routine colonoscopic examinations at three endoscopy centers in China were enrolled. Participants were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to the Embrella-assisted colonoscopy (EAC) or standard colonoscopy (SC) groups. ADR, APC, inspection time, pain scores, and adverse events were recorded. RESULTS Overall, 1179 patients were randomized into the EAC (n = 593) and SC groups (n = 586). EAC increased the overall ADR from 24.6% to 34.2% (P < .001) and improved APC from 0.44 to 0.64 (P = .002). Subgroup analyses indicated that EAC significantly improved ADR for adenomas < 10 mm (13.8% vs. 8.5%, P = .004 for 5-9 mm and 27.0% vs. 17.2%, P < .001 for < 5 mm), non-pedunculated adenomas (26.6% vs. 18.8%, P < .001), and adenomas in the transverse (10.8% vs. 6.1%, P = .004) and left colon (21.6% vs. 13.7%, P < .001). APC in the subgroup analyses was consistent with ADR. The mean inspection time was shorter with EAC (6.52 min vs. 6.68 min, P = .046), with no significant impact on patients' pain scores (P = .377). Moreover, no EAC-related adverse events occurred. CONCLUSION EAC significantly increased ADR and APC compared with SC, particularly for adenomas < 10 mm, non-pedunculated adenomas, and adenomas in the transverse and left colon.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用新型结肠镜远端附件提高腺瘤检出率:多中心随机对照试验。
目的与常规标准结肠镜检查相比,评估安布雷拉(一种新型设计的结肠镜远端附件)对腺瘤检出率(ADR)和每次结肠镜检查腺瘤数(APC)的影响。方法所有在中国三家内镜中心接受常规结肠镜检查的连续患者均被纳入研究。参与者按 1:1 的比例随机分配到安布雷拉辅助结肠镜检查(EAC)组或标准结肠镜检查(SC)组。结果共有 1179 名患者被随机分配到 EAC 组(593 人)和 SC 组(586 人)。EAC 将总体 ADR 从 24.6% 提高到 34.2%(P < .001),将 APC 从 0.44 提高到 0.64(P = .002)。亚组分析表明,EAC 显著改善了小于 10 毫米的腺瘤(13.8% 对 8.5%,5-9 毫米 P = .004;27.0% 对 17.2%,小于 5 毫米 P < .001)、非茎状腺瘤(26.6% 对 18.8%,P < .001)、横结肠腺瘤(10.8% 对 6.1%,P = .004)和左侧结肠腺瘤(21.6% 对 13.7%,P < .001)的 ADR。亚组分析中的 APC 与 ADR 一致。EAC 的平均检查时间更短(6.52 分钟 vs. 6.68 分钟,P = .046),对患者的疼痛评分无显著影响(P = .377)。结论与 SC 相比,EAC 明显增加了 ADR 和 APC,尤其是小于 10 mm 的腺瘤、非茎状腺瘤以及横结肠和左侧结肠的腺瘤。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Caution on Interpretation of Noninferiority Trial Results. Duration of Antibiotic in Cholangitis: Better to Have a Tailored Approach. "Reducing Eosinophil Counts in Eosinophilic Esophagitis in Children Is Associated with Reduction in Later Stricture Development". Improved adenoma detection rate using a novel colonoscopic distal attachment: a multicenter randomized controlled trial. Multidisciplinary Collaborative Team for Screening of Autoimmune Gastritis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1