Cancer patients have a reduced likelihood of dying in hospital with advance care planning in primary health care and a summarizing palliative plan: a prospective controlled non-randomized intervention trial.

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care Pub Date : 2024-04-25 DOI:10.1080/02813432.2024.2346131
B. Driller, Bente Talseth-Palmer, Torstein Hole, Kjell Erik Strømskag, Anne-Tove Brenne
{"title":"Cancer patients have a reduced likelihood of dying in hospital with advance care planning in primary health care and a summarizing palliative plan: a prospective controlled non-randomized intervention trial.","authors":"B. Driller, Bente Talseth-Palmer, Torstein Hole, Kjell Erik Strømskag, Anne-Tove Brenne","doi":"10.1080/02813432.2024.2346131","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\nAdvance care planning (ACP) allows patients to define their goals and preferences. Spending more time at home and less time in the hospital, along with avoiding death in the hospital, are often considered desirable outcomes of palliative care (PC). In 2015, 36% of cancer patients died in the hospital and 13% died at home in Norway.\n\n\nMETHOD\nFrom 2015 to 2022, this prospective controlled non-randomized intervention trial observed 144 cancer patients with or without an organized ACP conversation in primary health care and a summarizing palliative plan (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02170168, 23 June 2014). The patients were identified through contact with the local cancer outpatient clinic or hospital-based PC team.\n\n\nRESULTS\nA total of 128 patients died during the observation period. Of these, 67 patients had an organized ACP conversation and summarizing palliative plan (intervention (I) group) and 61 had not (control (C) group). Dying in the hospital was significantly less common for patients in the I group compared to the C group (17.9% vs. 34.4%; X2 (1, n = 128) = 4.55, p = 0.033). There were no differences between the groups in terms of where they spent their time in the last 90 days of life (home, nursing home, or hospital). Most patients (62%) preferred to die at home. The observed differences between the groups regarding preferred and actual places of death did not reach statistical significance.\n\n\nCONCLUSION\nWith organized ACP conversations in primary health care and a summarizing palliative plan, cancer patients died less often in the hospital in our observational study. A structured ACP approach integrating palliative care for cancer patients into primary health care can support patients´ preferences at the end of life.","PeriodicalId":21521,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02813432.2024.2346131","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND Advance care planning (ACP) allows patients to define their goals and preferences. Spending more time at home and less time in the hospital, along with avoiding death in the hospital, are often considered desirable outcomes of palliative care (PC). In 2015, 36% of cancer patients died in the hospital and 13% died at home in Norway. METHOD From 2015 to 2022, this prospective controlled non-randomized intervention trial observed 144 cancer patients with or without an organized ACP conversation in primary health care and a summarizing palliative plan (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02170168, 23 June 2014). The patients were identified through contact with the local cancer outpatient clinic or hospital-based PC team. RESULTS A total of 128 patients died during the observation period. Of these, 67 patients had an organized ACP conversation and summarizing palliative plan (intervention (I) group) and 61 had not (control (C) group). Dying in the hospital was significantly less common for patients in the I group compared to the C group (17.9% vs. 34.4%; X2 (1, n = 128) = 4.55, p = 0.033). There were no differences between the groups in terms of where they spent their time in the last 90 days of life (home, nursing home, or hospital). Most patients (62%) preferred to die at home. The observed differences between the groups regarding preferred and actual places of death did not reach statistical significance. CONCLUSION With organized ACP conversations in primary health care and a summarizing palliative plan, cancer patients died less often in the hospital in our observational study. A structured ACP approach integrating palliative care for cancer patients into primary health care can support patients´ preferences at the end of life.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在初级医疗保健中制定预先护理计划并总结姑息治疗计划可降低癌症患者在医院死亡的可能性:一项前瞻性非随机对照干预试验。
背景先期护理计划(ACP)允许病人确定自己的目标和偏好。在家中度过更多的时间、在医院度过更少的时间以及避免在医院死亡通常被认为是姑息治疗(PC)的理想结果。2015年,挪威有36%的癌症患者死于医院,13%的患者死于家中。METHODF从2015年至2022年,这项前瞻性对照非随机干预试验观察了144名癌症患者是否在初级医疗保健中进行了有组织的姑息关怀谈话和姑息计划总结(ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:NCT02170168,2014年6月23日)。这些患者是通过与当地癌症门诊或医院姑息治疗小组联系确定的。结果在观察期间,共有 128 名患者死亡。其中,67名患者进行了有组织的ACP谈话并总结了姑息治疗计划(干预(I)组),61名患者未进行干预(对照(C)组)。与 C 组相比,I 组患者在医院死亡的比例明显较低(17.9% 对 34.4%;X2 (1, n = 128) = 4.55, p = 0.033)。两组患者在生命最后 90 天的居住地(家庭、疗养院或医院)没有差异。大多数患者(62%)选择在家中去世。结论在我们的观察性研究中,通过在初级医疗保健中进行有组织的 ACP 对话和总结性姑息治疗计划,癌症患者在医院死亡的频率降低了。将癌症患者姑息治疗纳入初级医疗保健的结构化 ACP 方法可以支持患者在生命末期的偏好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
19.00%
发文量
47
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care is an international online open access journal publishing articles with relevance to general practice and primary health care. Focusing on the continuous professional development in family medicine the journal addresses clinical, epidemiological and humanistic topics in relation to the daily clinical practice. Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care is owned by the members of the National Colleges of General Practice in the five Nordic countries through the Nordic Federation of General Practice (NFGP). The journal includes original research on topics related to general practice and family medicine, and publishes both quantitative and qualitative original research, editorials, discussion and analysis papers and reviews to facilitate continuing professional development in family medicine. The journal''s topics range broadly and include: • Clinical family medicine • Epidemiological research • Qualitative research • Health services research.
期刊最新文献
Healthcare seeking - who, when and why? Diagnostic accuracy of signs and symptoms in acute coronary syndrome and acute myocardial infarction. Is general practitioner involvement in the initiation of opioids for chronic non-cancer pain associated with opioid dose and concurrent drug use? The in- and outpatient health care use of patients with COPD before and after initiation of home care: a registry study from Norway. General practitioners’ knowledge and practice in consultations with (potential) torture victims: a qualitative pilot study from Norway
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1