Lost in the pandemic: COVID-19's impact on health professions educators

IF 1.2 Q4 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL Clinical Teacher Pub Date : 2024-04-25 DOI:10.1111/tct.13764
Lori R. Newman, Alisa Nagler, Mariah Rudd, Rebecca D. Blanchard, Shari A. Whicker, Ariel S. Winn, Amy P. Cohen, Gareth Parry, Alan M. Leichtner, Jennifer C. Kesselheim
{"title":"Lost in the pandemic: COVID-19's impact on health professions educators","authors":"Lori R. Newman,&nbsp;Alisa Nagler,&nbsp;Mariah Rudd,&nbsp;Rebecca D. Blanchard,&nbsp;Shari A. Whicker,&nbsp;Ariel S. Winn,&nbsp;Amy P. Cohen,&nbsp;Gareth Parry,&nbsp;Alan M. Leichtner,&nbsp;Jennifer C. Kesselheim","doi":"10.1111/tct.13764","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Minimal research has explored the pandemic's impact on health professions educators (HPEs). Given that health professions educator academies provide centralised support and professional development to HPEs through communities of practice and promoting education at their institutions, it is important to examine how academies met HPEs' needs during the pandemic. This study investigates the COVID-19 pandemic's effects on HPEs and examines how academies supported HPEs' educational roles during the pandemic.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Using a mixed-methods approach, the authors surveyed United States educator academy members on changes in HPEs' activities, emphasising clinical and educational tasks and work–life integration. Participants shared their academies' innovations and support responses. Data were analysed using chi-square and content analyses.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Findings</h3>\n \n <p>Twenty percent of 2784 recipients (<i>n</i> = 559) completed the survey. Most respondents indicated the pandemic caused them to spend more time on clinical and education leadership/administration than before the pandemic. HPEs integrated innovative instructional strategies, yet many shifted away from teaching, mentoring and scholarship. Over half were dissatisfied with work–life integration during the pandemic. Females, especially, reported that professional work was compromised by personal caregiving. Academies increased their range of member services; however, they did not fully meet their members' needs, including providing expanded professional development and advocating on HPE's behalf for increased protected time dedicated to educator responsibilities.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Discussion</h3>\n \n <p>HPEs faced unprecedented challenges in their personal and professional lives during the COVID-19 pandemic. Neglecting the needs of HPEs amidst global crises poses a substantial threat to the quality of education for upcoming generations of health care professionals.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":47324,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Teacher","volume":"21 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Teacher","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://asmepublications.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/tct.13764","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Minimal research has explored the pandemic's impact on health professions educators (HPEs). Given that health professions educator academies provide centralised support and professional development to HPEs through communities of practice and promoting education at their institutions, it is important to examine how academies met HPEs' needs during the pandemic. This study investigates the COVID-19 pandemic's effects on HPEs and examines how academies supported HPEs' educational roles during the pandemic.

Methods

Using a mixed-methods approach, the authors surveyed United States educator academy members on changes in HPEs' activities, emphasising clinical and educational tasks and work–life integration. Participants shared their academies' innovations and support responses. Data were analysed using chi-square and content analyses.

Findings

Twenty percent of 2784 recipients (n = 559) completed the survey. Most respondents indicated the pandemic caused them to spend more time on clinical and education leadership/administration than before the pandemic. HPEs integrated innovative instructional strategies, yet many shifted away from teaching, mentoring and scholarship. Over half were dissatisfied with work–life integration during the pandemic. Females, especially, reported that professional work was compromised by personal caregiving. Academies increased their range of member services; however, they did not fully meet their members' needs, including providing expanded professional development and advocating on HPE's behalf for increased protected time dedicated to educator responsibilities.

Discussion

HPEs faced unprecedented challenges in their personal and professional lives during the COVID-19 pandemic. Neglecting the needs of HPEs amidst global crises poses a substantial threat to the quality of education for upcoming generations of health care professionals.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
大流行中的迷失:COVID-19 对卫生专业教育工作者的影响。
背景很少有研究探讨大流行病对卫生专业教育工作者(HPEs)的影响。鉴于卫生专业教育工作者学院通过实践社区和促进其所在机构的教育,为卫生专业教育工作者提供集中支持和专业发展,因此研究该学院在大流行期间如何满足卫生专业教育工作者的需求非常重要。本研究调查了 COVID-19 大流行对 HPEs 的影响,并研究了在大流行期间学院如何支持 HPEs 的教育角色。方法作者采用混合方法,对美国教育家学院成员进行了关于 HPEs 活动变化的调查,强调了临床和教育任务以及工作与生活的结合。参与者分享了各自学院的创新和支持对策。调查结果显示,2784 名受访者(n = 559)中有 20% 完成了调查。大多数受访者表示,与大流行之前相比,大流行使他们在临床和教育领导/管理方面花费了更多时间。高级专业人员整合了创新的教学策略,但许多人不再从事教学、指导和学术研究。超过一半的人对大流行期间工作与生活的融合感到不满。尤其是女性报告说,个人护理工作影响了专业工作。学院增加了会员服务的范围;但是,它们并没有完全满足会员的需求,包括提供更多的专业发展和代表 HPE 倡导增加专门用于履行教育职责的受保护时间。在全球危机中忽视医疗保健专业人员的需求会对下一代医疗保健专业人员的教育质量构成严重威胁。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Teacher
Clinical Teacher MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
5.60%
发文量
113
期刊介绍: The Clinical Teacher has been designed with the active, practising clinician in mind. It aims to provide a digest of current research, practice and thinking in medical education presented in a readable, stimulating and practical style. The journal includes sections for reviews of the literature relating to clinical teaching bringing authoritative views on the latest thinking about modern teaching. There are also sections on specific teaching approaches, a digest of the latest research published in Medical Education and other teaching journals, reports of initiatives and advances in thinking and practical teaching from around the world, and expert community and discussion on challenging and controversial issues in today"s clinical education.
期刊最新文献
Supporting Feedback and Trust in CBME: A Conjoint WBA Workshop for Trainers and Trainees Generative Artificial Intelligence and Risk of Premature Expertise: Why Human Judgement Remains Essential in Medical Education Structure and Utility of e-Portfolios for Reflection and Learning in Healthcare Professional Education: A Narrative Review New Associate Editors, New Article Type, New Voices and New Special Issue Education in the Era of Teleneurology: Development and Evaluation of a Curriculum for Internal Medicine Residents
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1