Three-year Clinical Impact of Murray Law-Based Quantitative Flow Ratio and OCT- or FFR-Guidance in Angiographically Intermediate Coronary Lesions.

C. Aurigemma, D. Ding, Shengxian Tu, Chunming Li, Wei Yu, Yingguang Li, Antonio Maria Leone, Enrico Romagnoli, Rocco Vergallo, Alessandro Maino, C. Trani, William Wijns, F. Burzotta
{"title":"Three-year Clinical Impact of Murray Law-Based Quantitative Flow Ratio and OCT- or FFR-Guidance in Angiographically Intermediate Coronary Lesions.","authors":"C. Aurigemma, D. Ding, Shengxian Tu, Chunming Li, Wei Yu, Yingguang Li, Antonio Maria Leone, Enrico Romagnoli, Rocco Vergallo, Alessandro Maino, C. Trani, William Wijns, F. Burzotta","doi":"10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.123.013191","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\nThe FORZA trial (FFR or OCT Guidance to Revascularize Intermediate Coronary Stenosis Using Angioplasty) prospectively compared the use of fractional flow reserve (FFR) or optical coherence tomography (OCT) for treatment decisions and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) optimization in patients with angiographically intermediate coronary lesions. Murray law-based quantitative-flow-ratio (μQFR) is a novel noninvasive method for the computation of FFR. In the present study, we evaluated the clinical impact of μQFR, FFR, or OCT guidance in FORZA trial lesions at 3-year follow-up.\n\n\nMETHODS\nμQFR was assessed at baseline and, in the case of a decision to intervene, after (FFR- or OCT-guided) PCI. The baseline μQFR was considered the final μQFR for deferred lesions, and post-PCI μQFR value was taken as final for stented lesions. The primary end point was target vessel failure ([TVF]; cardiac death, target-vessel-related myocardial infarction, and target-vessel-revascularization) at a 3-year follow-up.\n\n\nRESULTS\nA total of 419 vessels (199 OCT-guided and 220 FFR-guided) were included in the FORZA trial. μQFR was evaluated in 256 deferred lesions and 159 treated lesions (98 OCT-guided PCI and 61 FFR-guided PCI). In treated lesions, post-PCI μQFR was higher in OCT-group compared with FFR-group (median, 0.93 versus 0.91; P=0.023), and the post-PCI μQFR improvement was greater in FFR-group (0.14 versus 0.08; P<0.0001). At 3-year follow-up, OCT- and FFR-guided treatment decisions resulted in comparable TVF rate (6.7% versus 7.9%; P=0.617). Final μQFR was the only predictor of TVF. μQFR ≤0.89 was associated with 3× increase in TVF (11.6% versus 3.7%; P=0.004). PCI was a predictor of higher final μQFR (odds ratio, 0.22 [95% CI, 0.14-0.34]; P<0.001).\n\n\nCONCLUSIONS\nIn vessels with angiographically intermediate coronary lesions, OCT-guided PCI resulted in comparable clinical outcomes as FFR-guided PCI. μQFR estimated at the end of diagnostic or interventional procedure predicted 3-year TVF.\n\n\nREGISTRATION\nURL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT01824030.","PeriodicalId":516631,"journal":{"name":"Circulation. Cardiovascular interventions","volume":"21 13","pages":"e013191"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Circulation. Cardiovascular interventions","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.123.013191","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND The FORZA trial (FFR or OCT Guidance to Revascularize Intermediate Coronary Stenosis Using Angioplasty) prospectively compared the use of fractional flow reserve (FFR) or optical coherence tomography (OCT) for treatment decisions and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) optimization in patients with angiographically intermediate coronary lesions. Murray law-based quantitative-flow-ratio (μQFR) is a novel noninvasive method for the computation of FFR. In the present study, we evaluated the clinical impact of μQFR, FFR, or OCT guidance in FORZA trial lesions at 3-year follow-up. METHODS μQFR was assessed at baseline and, in the case of a decision to intervene, after (FFR- or OCT-guided) PCI. The baseline μQFR was considered the final μQFR for deferred lesions, and post-PCI μQFR value was taken as final for stented lesions. The primary end point was target vessel failure ([TVF]; cardiac death, target-vessel-related myocardial infarction, and target-vessel-revascularization) at a 3-year follow-up. RESULTS A total of 419 vessels (199 OCT-guided and 220 FFR-guided) were included in the FORZA trial. μQFR was evaluated in 256 deferred lesions and 159 treated lesions (98 OCT-guided PCI and 61 FFR-guided PCI). In treated lesions, post-PCI μQFR was higher in OCT-group compared with FFR-group (median, 0.93 versus 0.91; P=0.023), and the post-PCI μQFR improvement was greater in FFR-group (0.14 versus 0.08; P<0.0001). At 3-year follow-up, OCT- and FFR-guided treatment decisions resulted in comparable TVF rate (6.7% versus 7.9%; P=0.617). Final μQFR was the only predictor of TVF. μQFR ≤0.89 was associated with 3× increase in TVF (11.6% versus 3.7%; P=0.004). PCI was a predictor of higher final μQFR (odds ratio, 0.22 [95% CI, 0.14-0.34]; P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS In vessels with angiographically intermediate coronary lesions, OCT-guided PCI resulted in comparable clinical outcomes as FFR-guided PCI. μQFR estimated at the end of diagnostic or interventional procedure predicted 3-year TVF. REGISTRATION URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT01824030.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于默里定律的定量血流比和 OCT 或 FFR 指导对血管造影中段冠状动脉病变的三年临床影响
背景FORZA试验(FFR或OCT指导血管成形术对中度冠状动脉狭窄进行血管再通)前瞻性地比较了分数血流储备(FFR)或光学相干断层扫描(OCT)在血管造影中度冠状动脉病变患者的治疗决策和经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)优化中的应用。基于默里定律的定量血流比(μQFR)是计算 FFR 的一种新型无创方法。在本研究中,我们评估了μQFR、FFR或OCT引导对FORZA试验病变的临床影响(随访3年)。基线μQFR被视为延迟病变的最终μQFR,PCI后μQFR值被视为支架病变的最终μQFR。结果FORZA试验共纳入了419个血管(199个OCT引导血管和220个FFR引导血管),对256个延期病变和159个治疗病变(98个OCT引导PCI和61个FFR引导PCI)的μQFR进行了评估。在接受治疗的病变中,OCT组与FFR组相比,PCI术后μQFR更高(中位数为0.93对0.91;P=0.023),FFR组PCI术后μQFR的改善幅度更大(0.14对0.08;P<0.0001)。在 3 年的随访中,OCT 和 FFR 指导的治疗决策导致的 TVF 率相当(6.7% 对 7.9%;P=0.617)。最终μQFR是TVF的唯一预测因素。μQFR≤0.89与TVF增加3倍相关(11.6%对3.7%;P=0.004)。PCI是较高最终μQFR的预测因素(几率比为0.22 [95% CI, 0.14-0.34];P<0.001)。结论在血管造影为中度冠状动脉病变的血管中,OCT引导的PCI可获得与FFR引导的PCI相当的临床结果。诊断或介入手术结束时估算的μQFR可预测3年的TVF.REGISTRATIONURL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier:NCT01824030。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Percutaneous Balloon-Expandable Stent Implantation to Treat Transverse Aortic Arch Obstruction: Medium- to Long-Term Outcomes of a Retrospective Multicenter Study. Coronary Angiography-Derived Index of Microcirculatory Resistance Predicts Outcome in Patients With ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction. Three-year Clinical Impact of Murray Law-Based Quantitative Flow Ratio and OCT- or FFR-Guidance in Angiographically Intermediate Coronary Lesions. Compunction: The Present Tense of Physiology to Guide Coronary Revascularization in Severe Aortic Stenosis. PCI in Cancer Patients: Adding Another Piece to a Complex and Still Very Incomplete Puzzle.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1